Building 7?

Apart from the real tragedy of human lives lost, which can't be undone now - I don't particularly CARE how the buildings came down...it doesn't affect me in my little world that revolves around day-to-day living with my head in the sand! And nothing I could ever have done would've stopped it from happening.

I wasn't there, so I can't prove it either way, and I don't trust any of the media (including the interweb conspiracists), so basically, no vote either way from me, because...

I DON'T CARE how or why, or why not, or what reason, or who!

Its got nothing to do with oil.

..baaa-ing like a petermac...

It seems that way because you are looking at it from the wrong perpsective ie, the US government and taxpayer are worse off but the christian mercenaries and contractors like balckwater and haliburton got very rich. Don't forget the Bush's family wealth is tied up in the oil business, they made a killing just from the rise in the price of oil.

At least Donald Trump had the guts to be honest about lybia, "if we get the oil we go in".

I need better bait.

I was waiting for Isaac Newton to respond to the above use of his formula but he hasn't.
Then I remembered that he died a few years ago so I guess he can be excused.
Just before he died I think he said;
S = ut + 1/2 at^2
which means t = (2S/a) ^1/2 given that u=0, s=416, a=9.81

sooooo, t = (2 x 416 /9.81 ) to the power of 1/2
= (84.814) ^1/2
= approx 9.2 seconds.

This is still far short of the fall time shown in the Uchoob vid, but I spose the authorities could have got to the U choob server and slowed it down a tad.
Dang... there's another thousand people in on the deception. It's awfully good of them to all keep mum about it. I'm sure wikileaks will crack this open really soon and all will be revealed

DOH! OK, obviously it's been too long since I studied my physics...

Actually, I saw somewhere in the wikipedia stuff that it was 25 seconds before the lower floors hit the ground. I was pretty sure that freefall was a bit quicker than that which made me whip out the trusty calculator and dodgy memory...

I think it's pretty obvious that engineers put explosive charges throughout two of the most used office towers in the world without anybody noticing.

As for plane wreckage. Planes are built light for a reason.

Here's a 747 from last year:



Here's what a small plane looks like after hitting a building:



Le Concorde:



So you can imagine what is left of an aircraft, built as light as possible, after it crashes full speed into the side of the heavily re-enforced Pentagon building. It kinda disintegrates. Obviously. There'd be pieces. Everywhere. Very small ones.

There's probably no footage of the actual plane, or it's very blurry, because they didn't use high speed cameras. I'd guess security camera at 15 frames/second. Maybe less. don't know how much ground that covers, nor what speed aircrat was travelling at. Somebody can do the maths.

In the end it seems far, far more likely that a fanatical terrorist organisation trained some pilots who then hijacked some planes and crashed them into buildings that weren't designed for something like that. Seriously what is so hard to understand about that?

An aside: Bin Laden's goal was to bankrupt America, they spent a truck load on these unnecessary wars. Same way the Afghanis beat the Russians.

if a plane disintegrates when contacting a building,then why no disintegration when the two planes contacted the towers?

not even the slightest deceleration actually?

you can't have it both ways.



funniest thing i've heard recently regarding this topic, was ex Yorkshire head of intelligence,Tony Farrell sacked for believing 911,among others was an inside job.


''Tony Farrell, 51, handed in an annual "threat assessment" report after falling for a conspiracy theory he stumbled across on the internet.''

yeah,and the mindless masses have fallen for the conspiracy theory that fire melts steel!

that fire can bring building 7 down into it's own footprint in near perfect symmetry!



www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/3699907/77-was-a-plot-by-the-Government.html

Look to see who benefits.

I was pretty sceptical myself. From 2000 through to 2007 I isolated myself from current affairs, and tv. Only when sharing a house with someone did I get exposed to the theories.

I am 56 and have seen a lot of stink over the years and had a pathological dislike of the American way. Vietmnam anyone? But this escalation in the middle east started to fascinate me as I saw dollars pour into increasing aggression. So I started to read and if you do so you uncover some very dark material which is kept out of commercial media. Sure there is a huge amount of crap out there and I had to weather an awful lot but in the process I came to read alternate current affairs journalists who had no political bent or agenda other than to tell it the way they see it.

In this process, whilst losing complete faith in commericial media, I have managed to uncover a number of folk whose insight I find quite refreshing because their writing and speaking caries that ozone scent of the truth as opposed to the stench of Murdoch and his cronies breath.

Check this out for a funny take on the CNN/Fox propaganda machine attemtping to bury Ron Paul.

So lets go through the basic flow chart of the conspiracy with WTC 7.

We'll nut the whole process out and get the complete picture.

Feel free to correct or elaborate on the following points:


1) A group of people installed and wired up tonnes of high powered explosives in the WTC 7 during a certain time frame before 11/9/2001. It's very likely this was done in the months proceeding the planned explosion date.


2) The people that noticed/suspected suspicious activity at WTC 7 before September 11 were (insert names of individuals here).


3) WTC 1 and 2 fell down on 11/9/2001 and collapsed into rubble (officially because 2 planes crashed into them. Others say they fell down because of missile strike or bombs. Bottom line is: "they fell down")


4) The people who had control of the detonation button waited until both WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed.


5) The people who had control of the detonation button waited for several more hours to pass


6) Late in the day the explosives were detonated by (insert possible groups or machines responsible) using a computer controlled sequence.


7) WTC 7 fell down


8) No person was killed or injured due to WTC 7 collapsing


Is this a correct summary of the "True" events?

sorry saltiest, you have been had again.

all giant superstructures have central support columns,why because if they had none the horizontal beams would bend/sag. the distance from each end of the exterior horizontal columns would be too great.

Why was $40,000,000 spent on investigating Monica's head job on Bill??

Because he was a progressive and showing signs of emulating J.F.K. and the plan was to destroy the institution of the American Presidency.

Why was only $600,000 spent on investigating the 9/11 WTC catastrophe??

Because it was an inside job and the plan was to irrevocably alter the American legal structure so as to deny human rights, eg the Patriot Act.

Wake up people!! It is a con job!!

If you want to learn a little about the American Constitution, how good it is and why the elites are throwing everything they can at it to tear it down watch the whole 51 minutes of this.

The yanks really are our best friends.

As he says, we need to get rid of this two party partisanship, get back to the principals of right and wrong and eliminate the power of the privately owned central banking system.

We're seeing a society that not only has a lot more people of lower IQ, but a lot fewer people of higher IQ. In other words: a dumbing down, a chemical dumbing down of society.

So everyone is sort of mediocre. That leaves them dependent on government, because they can't excel.

We have these people of lower IQ who are totally dependent. Then we have this mass of people who are going to believe anything they are told because they can't really think clearly—and very few people of a very high IQ have good cognitive function who can figure this all out.

And that's what they want.

So you can kind of piece it together as to why they are so insistent in spending so many hundreds of millions of dollars of propaganda money to dumb down society.”

- Dr. Russell Blaylock