Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Home Truths on Socialist Welfare.

Reply
Created by cisco > 9 months ago, 22 Aug 2011
FormulaNova
WA, 14645 posts
22 Aug 2011 9:05PM
Thumbs Up

Just on this topic, I just have to say, right at this moment I feel pretty happy knowing that I live in a country that is doing pretty well, and if for some reason I started to do it tough, that I would still have food, shelter, and free access to health care.


busterwa
3777 posts
22 Aug 2011 10:04PM
Thumbs Up

remember the good old days....

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
23 Aug 2011 11:09AM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...

Mobydisc said...

That article is not totally true. There are many homeless people in Australia. Absolute poverty exists in Australia. I live in a fairly prosperous part of Sydney, on the upper north shore. In this area there is a large number of homeless people who surviving in surrounding bushland. A local church runs a mobile kitchen for homeless people every Friday night and they get large numbers of people around for a decent meal. Volunteers say the numbers they feed are increasing dramatically. A large number of the homeless are there because of a lack of money.

Despite the tens of billions of dollars that are redistributed, many Australians suffer from absolute poverty. Governments has largely given up on looking after these people, many of whom suffer from mental illness. Despite giving up, the workers and entrepreneurs keep getting taxed.

Because these people are marginal and don't have a voice, they are looked over, feared and despised all the time.

The article should also ask whether some Australians have become more prosperous and have more gadgets to keep them entertained despite the state, not because of it.

Sure you can't legislate everyone into prosperity but there are many examples of legislating industries and people into poverty. There are also examples of freeing up people to do the deal and work into prosperity.




MobyD, I strongly believe that the homeless people you are talking about have mental health problems first, not financial problems, other than those caused by their condition. Their situation is not caused by lack of money.

If you don't believe me, go have a chat with one. I suspect you would find out its not about money.

Having said that, I do not know this first hand, but I cannot see how a person in Australian society would not be able to find housing if they have access to social security.

Who really lives in absolute poverty in Australia?



Another factor would be that there is no rental (public or private) available (in WA anyway)! We are lucky (not) to have scored CHOGM 2011 for the glory of little king Barnett (he will meet queen Lizzi wow) We have a lot of homeless peeps living around the convention centre and they will be rounded and sent somewhere??? During the big circus, can't show the world that we are not the lucky country for all! But in another hand we are spending $ 2500.00 a day to accommodate a few illegal migrants in holiday chalets just around the corner in Jandakot ??? WTF???? Are we crazy??? Apparently the chalets have been booked for one year in advance that is $900,000.00 for the year! That money would go a long way to help a few OZ's mentally disturbed (maybe?) homeless!
Charity well organized starts at home!

evlPanda
NSW, 9202 posts
23 Aug 2011 4:17PM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...
The guy that sold the plasma TVs, then decides to add an extra storey to his house, or to buy a new car, or to spend the extra cash at his local. This in turn stimulates someone else's business. Generally people will spend more and this in turn keeps more people employed, and more people spending.

If someone took the stimulus cheque and banked it, and didn't spend an extra cent, then you are right, there is no direct nett benefit to the economy. Then again, it might have resulted in a more positive feeling of security, and those people that saved it eventually spent more than they otherwise would.


Are you saying when I'm overpowered I should not sheet out? But that defies common sense!

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
23 Aug 2011 2:29PM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

FormulaNova said...
The guy that sold the plasma TVs, then decides to add an extra storey to his house, or to buy a new car, or to spend the extra cash at his local. This in turn stimulates someone else's business. Generally people will spend more and this in turn keeps more people employed, and more people spending.

If someone took the stimulus cheque and banked it, and didn't spend an extra cent, then you are right, there is no direct nett benefit to the economy. Then again, it might have resulted in a more positive feeling of security, and those people that saved it eventually spent more than they otherwise would.


Are you saying when I'm overpowered I should not sheet out? But that defies common sense!




(.).)

tmurray
WA, 485 posts
23 Aug 2011 6:43PM
Thumbs Up

doggie said...

cisco said...

FormulaNova said...
It is a sad state of affairs that a successful program that kept the economy humming along is not understood by most people.


If it was a success, I for one certainly do not understand how it was.




They said buy Australian, most didnt. So how does that work? I like most people dont understand why junkies got $900 to blow on drugs! If i never got that $900 I would not be worse off


It was a tax rebate - you only got it if you paid at least $900 in tax, I suspect most junkies didn't

tmurray
WA, 485 posts
23 Aug 2011 6:48PM
Thumbs Up

Back to the original question - I think the seldom stated but real reason we have welfare is to stop poor people pinching our tvs.

FormulaNova
WA, 14645 posts
23 Aug 2011 8:37PM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

FormulaNova said...
The guy that sold the plasma TVs, then decides to add an extra storey to his house, or to buy a new car, or to spend the extra cash at his local. This in turn stimulates someone else's business. Generally people will spend more and this in turn keeps more people employed, and more people spending.

If someone took the stimulus cheque and banked it, and didn't spend an extra cent, then you are right, there is no direct nett benefit to the economy. Then again, it might have resulted in a more positive feeling of security, and those people that saved it eventually spent more than they otherwise would.


Are you saying when I'm overpowered I should not sheet out? But that defies common sense!




No I am not.

Maybe something more like, if there is not quite enough wind to plane, you should pump onto a plane, and that might be enough to keep you going.

I don't see how your analogy to windsurfing is valid. Who is overpowered? (Besides everyone knows that when you are overpowered you just sheet in even more and go harder!)

cisco
QLD, 12325 posts
23 Aug 2011 11:37PM
Thumbs Up

SomeOtherGuy said...
cisco said...

If it was a success, I for one certainly do not understand how it was.


Maybe if you spent less time reading that right wing baptist crap and more time actually educating yourself you would.



Shoot you get prickly when someone dares to suggest that Socialism may not be the ideal cradle for human growth and development.

So what is your take on Thomas Jefferson?? Just another right wing fanatic I suppose.


THOMAS JEFFERSON

At 5, began studying under his cousin's tutor.

At 9, studied Latin, Greek and French.

At 14, studied classical literature and additional languages.

At 16, entered the College of William and Mary.

At 19, studied Law for 5 years starting under George Wythe.

At 23, started his own law practice.

At 25, was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses.

At 31, wrote the widely circulated "Summary View of the
Rights of British America" and retired from his law practice.

At 32, was a Delegate to the Second Continental Congress.

At 33, wrote the Declaration of Independence ..

At 33, took three years to revise Virginia 's legal code
and wrote a Public Education bill and a statute for Religious Freedom.

At 36, was elected the second Governor of Virginia
succeeding Patrick Henry.

At 40, served in Congress for two years.

At 41, was the American minister to France and negotiated
commercial treaties with European nations along with Ben
Franklin and John Adams.

At 46, served as the first Secretary of State under
George Washington.

At 53, served as Vice President and was elected president
of the American Philosophical Society.

At 55, drafted the Kentucky Resolutions and became the
active head of Republican Party.

At 57, was elected the third president of the United States ..

At 60, obtained the Louisiana Purchase doubling the nation's
size.

At 61, was elected to a second term as President.

At 65, retired to Monticello ..

At 80, helped President Monroe shape the Monroe Doctrine.

At 81, almost single-handedly created the University of
Virginia and served as its first president.

At 83, died on the 50th anniversary of the Signing of the
Declaration of Independence .

John F. Kennedy held a dinner in the white House for a group of
the brightest minds in the nation at that time. He made this
statement: "This is perhaps the assembly of the most intelligence ever
to gather at one time in the White House with the exception of when
Thomas Jefferson dined alone."

When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe,
we shall become as corrupt as Europe .
Thomas Jefferson

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson


It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it
goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of
the world.
Thomas Jefferson


I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labours of the people under the pretence
of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government
results from too much government.
Thomas Jefferson


No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep
and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against
tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson


The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the
blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of
ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson


Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our
liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow
private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will
grow up around the banks will deprive
the people of all property - until their children wake-up homeless on
the continent their fathers conquered.


..........................................................................................................


The last one is where we are at.

You suggest that handing out money, willy nilly, and running up the National Debt is a good idea.

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.

You are certainly not worried about it as by your own admission you do not PLAN to be around that long.

One might assume you do not have children, or if you do, you do not give a rat's arse about them or their future.

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
24 Aug 2011 12:46AM
Thumbs Up

tmurray said...

Back to the original question - I think the seldom stated but real reason we have welfare is to stop poor people pinching our tvs.


Give this man a cracker. The unfortunate truth is that if you want to live in a safe low crime community, then you have to carry those who are unable or unwilling to work. Even then there will be some who prefer crime, but you will be minimising the seeds of it.

I *loved* living in South Africa. Amongst other things I loved how the government didn't interfere with your life. It certainly wasn't a nanny state. There isn't much welfare given out. But although I was tempted to settle there I ultimately came home because I didn't want to worry that my (future) wife and daughters were getting raped every time they were 5 minutes late home.

There is sooo much good about Australia that's taken for granted. It's like when you were a kid and your parents said 'you don't realise how good you have it' and you thought 'yeah right, whatever'. Then you moved out, got a full time job, washed your own clothes, cleaned your own house, cooked for yourself, basically opened your eyes to what the real world was like. As an adult you have to go live in less fortunate countries before you can understand how good we have it here.


SomeOtherGuy
NSW, 807 posts
24 Aug 2011 12:13PM
Thumbs Up

cisco said...

...(lots of irrelevant stuff) ...

One might assume you do not have children, or if you do, you do not give a rat's arse about them or their future.


HAH!

Given that I talked about my son in that same post you're quoting, I can see you don't pay much attention to what I say. In which case, there's not much point going on about Jefferson living off other people or the causes of the Great Depression.

If you've got this far... try Wiki! You could learn that your issue with debt was a major cause of that event. Which is why governments around the world decided to SPEND during the gfc.

Of course, you may well be prepared to have the Libs in control regardless of the cost to the country. Maybe it's you that don't give a rats?

poor relative
WA, 9089 posts
24 Aug 2011 11:12AM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...

Just on this topic, I just have to say, right at this moment I feel pretty happy knowing that I live in a country that is doing pretty well, and if for some reason I started to do it tough, that I would still have food, shelter, and free access to health care.





This ^^

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
24 Aug 2011 1:03PM
Thumbs Up

Spot on Formula and Relly.

We, our friends or rellos have ALL benefited from Oz's (usually) healthy attitude to social welfare (Medicare anyone?) and the philosophy of a 'safety net' at some time in the past and are likely to in the future..

Remember the recession in late 80's? Most CUBs probably don't but likely their folks benefitted in some way from Oz's welfare system and Medicare that followed soon after. Go on Mr jet ski polisher - ask ya folks about it sometime..

Unfortunately (IMO) the more afluent our country becomes the more the 'have's' want to distance themselves from the 'have not's and make sure the 'have not's' damn well stay there never to rise above the lower classes.

Keep on with this very US style attitude and try to treat the term/philosophy of 'social welfare' as an evil akin to kiddy fiddling and watch our 'fair go' society go to hell in a hand basket. [}:)]

And just wait for the 'have's' to go on and on about the rise in crime, violence and barricade themselves behind high estate walls.

cisco
QLD, 12325 posts
24 Aug 2011 5:07PM
Thumbs Up

SomeOtherGuy said...
If you've got this far... try Wiki! You could learn that your issue with debt was a major cause of that event. Which is why governments around the world decided to SPEND during the gfc.


That may all be well and good but I would still like to know:-

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


SomeOtherGuy
NSW, 807 posts
24 Aug 2011 5:47PM
Thumbs Up

cisco said...

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


Taxpayers cisco, taxpayers repay it.

Which by definition means they have a job and are earning income.

Does nobody any bloomin' good whatsoever if the government has got a squillion truckloads of cash in the bank and half of everyone is out of a job. The cash wouldn't last long either if it was dribbled out in dole payments and we're all still out of a job would it?

Choose your evil, cisco.

EDIT: Now how about you name me one direct benefit you were getting from that money the government had in the bank. One. Don't forget, it was your money (and mine). I wanna know what I was getting for it. Eventually, I got $900 of my money back... which to me means they shouldn'a took it in the first place!

Mark _australia
WA, 22362 posts
24 Aug 2011 4:28PM
Thumbs Up

SomeOtherGuy said...

cisco said...

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


Taxpayers cisco, taxpayers repay it.

Which by definition means they have a job and are earning income.

Does nobody any bloomin' good whatsoever if the government has got a squillion truckloads of cash in the bank and half of everyone is out of a job. The cash wouldn't last long either if it was dribbled out in dole payments and we're all still out of a job would it?

Choose your evil, cisco.

EDIT: Now how about you name me one direct benefit you were getting from that money the government had in the bank. One. Don't forget, it was your money (and mine). I wanna know what I was getting for it. Eventually, I got $900 of my money back... which to me means they shouldn'a took it in the first place!


How about being able to pay for major projects without borrowing and paying interest?

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
24 Aug 2011 4:38PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

SomeOtherGuy said...

cisco said...

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


Taxpayers cisco, taxpayers repay it.

Which by definition means they have a job and are earning income.

Does nobody any bloomin' good whatsoever if the government has got a squillion truckloads of cash in the bank and half of everyone is out of a job. The cash wouldn't last long either if it was dribbled out in dole payments and we're all still out of a job would it?

Choose your evil, cisco.

EDIT: Now how about you name me one direct benefit you were getting from that money the government had in the bank. One. Don't forget, it was your money (and mine). I wanna know what I was getting for it. Eventually, I got $900 of my money back... which to me means they shouldn'a took it in the first place!


How about being able to pay for major projects without borrowing and paying interest?



Yes.... and all the pigs are lined up the runway ready to fly!

japie
NSW, 6852 posts
24 Aug 2011 6:41PM
Thumbs Up

There is a tight clasp on humanity that throttles it's very existence and that is the concept of debt. Unfortunately the Concept is a reality that is our global economy. It is more effective a hold than the chains that bound slaves together as they boarded the galley's.

This constant bickering that ensues through the CAUSE OF THE NATIONAL DEBT is quite banal when you consider the implications and the opportunites that exist to remove entirely the uncertainty and misery that results from it.

There are a lot of towel head bashers on here. I have said it before and will say it again, open up your eyes to what has happened over the last 20 years to a rapidly expanding religion that preached and practised the evil of usury.

For those of you that do not know the term, it is what caused Jesus of Nazareth to commit his only violent act, whipping the money lenders from the temple. It is also now the first tenet of our ECONOMY ( bow down and make religious signs!)

And whilst waxing eloquent Carantoc, you posted somewhere that we are as we are because of the survival of the fittest. Wrong, we are group primates and cannot survive as individuals. If the group collapses so do we. Furthemore we also rely on the wellbeing of our neighbours because their ills become ours.

Funnily enough this same theme applies to our home, Earth.

japie
NSW, 6852 posts
24 Aug 2011 6:47PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

SomeOtherGuy said...

cisco said...

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


Taxpayers cisco, taxpayers repay it.

Which by definition means they have a job and are earning income.

Does nobody any bloomin' good whatsoever if the government has got a squillion truckloads of cash in the bank and half of everyone is out of a job. The cash wouldn't last long either if it was dribbled out in dole payments and we're all still out of a job would it?

Choose your evil, cisco.

EDIT: Now how about you name me one direct benefit you were getting from that money the government had in the bank. One. Don't forget, it was your money (and mine). I wanna know what I was getting for it. Eventually, I got $900 of my money back... which to me means they shouldn'a took it in the first place!


How about being able to pay for major projects without borrowing and paying interest?




How about us waking up to ourselves, showing some balls and supporting a government that stands on issuing our own currency

Oops, the John Kennedy lesson stuck pretty good!

SomeOtherGuy
NSW, 807 posts
24 Aug 2011 6:48PM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...

SomeOtherGuy said...

cisco said...

Debt by definition is something that has to be repaid, so who do you think is going to have to repay this huge debt.


Taxpayers cisco, taxpayers repay it.

Which by definition means they have a job and are earning income.

Does nobody any bloomin' good whatsoever if the government has got a squillion truckloads of cash in the bank and half of everyone is out of a job. The cash wouldn't last long either if it was dribbled out in dole payments and we're all still out of a job would it?

Choose your evil, cisco.

EDIT: Now how about you name me one direct benefit you were getting from that money the government had in the bank. One. Don't forget, it was your money (and mine). I wanna know what I was getting for it. Eventually, I got $900 of my money back... which to me means they shouldn'a took it in the first place!


How about being able to pay for major projects without borrowing and paying interest?




Yeah, that'd get my vote as well, Mark. Just wish the Libs had done a major project in all those years they were in. Or even helped to pay for stuff that we did have. Instead of just stashing cash in a sock and telling us how good they were!

Mark _australia
WA, 22362 posts
24 Aug 2011 5:01PM
Thumbs Up

^^^ too right

DrJ
ACT, 481 posts
24 Aug 2011 9:58PM
Thumbs Up

I still have my $900.... In fact it's now worth about $1200 thanks to a term deposit.

FormulaNova
WA, 14645 posts
24 Aug 2011 8:46PM
Thumbs Up

DrJ said...

I still have my $900.... In fact it's now worth about $1200 thanks to a term deposit.


Can I have that interest rate? When was the $900 paid out?

cisco
QLD, 12325 posts
25 Aug 2011 11:35AM
Thumbs Up

SomeOtherGuy said...

Mark _australia said...
How about being able to pay for major projects without borrowing and paying interest?


Yeah, that'd get my vote as well, Mark. Just wish the Libs had done a major project in all those years they were in. Or even helped to pay for stuff that we did have. Instead of just stashing cash in a sock and telling us how good they were!


That gets my vote too. The way to get major projects going is as Japie says:-

How about us waking up to ourselves, showing some balls and supporting a government that stands on issuing our own currency

A Nationally owned Bank of Credit Issue.

It would nice to just have a government with balls. Balls enough to sort the banks and the multinationals and the oil companies.

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
25 Aug 2011 10:42AM
Thumbs Up

SomeOtherGuy said...Just wish the Libs had done a major project in all those years they were in. Or even helped to pay for stuff that we did have. Instead of just stashing cash in a sock and telling us how good they were!


+1

Saving the pennies while the house falls down around you - not the best long term solution.. but who thinks beyond 3yrs anyway? Certainly not many in Lab/Lib that's for sure.

Dumb it down, sell it to the masses in small (inaccurate) byte sized chunks.. If it gets sticky fall back on the fear of invasion or crime.. sit back and enjoy the ride all the way to the gold card retirement priviledges.. Ahh the life of the polli.


Sure would be nice to have a govt with balls.. Then again the Ruddster stood up to be counted and went his own way.. then got knee-capped by his own party.

Ditto for Turnbull.


The biggest thing holding the short and curlies of those with some gumption is the dodgy internal dynamics of both major parties.


What a kn joke the 2 party system is.

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
25 Aug 2011 10:53AM
Thumbs Up

Here's a thought, who would go for a break-away party headed by Turnbull and cherry picking the (few) talented and progressive members of the majors?

Add a couple of moderate Greens etc and I think that a serious 3rd option would be the biggest step forward for this country since federation.

I reckon Labor would be out of business almost overnight and Libs would have to smarten up - BIG TIME!

Just my 2c.

Gaawwnn Malcolm - please!



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Home Truths on Socialist Welfare." started by cisco