While I was falling asleep last night I was thinking of quantum entanglement... and I got to thinking about how we could take advantage of the phenomena.
We all know of the practical applications like instant communication, computing, teleportation, lag free gaming, etc...
But can we leverage the phenomena, to say, change particle properties in a zero G environment while affecting the entangled particle on Earth?
We wouldn't need to affect the whole of the object just a number of the atoms embed in the object.
Eg: Joe has a hoverboard on Earth with x number of atoms with off Earth entangled particles.
The a force is applied to the off Earth atoms and instantly the same happens to Joe's hoverboard.
I know the phenomena is 4D (space/time) independent, so is this theoretically possible?
I came up with this idea from watching UFO videos... I thought maybe the light discs that seems so prevalent are in reality only the energy signatures of entangled particles.
What y'all reckon?
Can't find it on the choob but now I'm really curious to know what Herman Cain said.
Love the fact that he managed to keep a straight face while delivering the roasting.
^^hahaha, epic response to an epic question.. For those that don't know, it's from Billy Madison, during the Academic Decathlon..
Anyway, I think Feynman said it best,
They are entangled, so by definition - yes.
This video explains what Flysurfer is talking about, for those who have drifted off asleep.
I'm only guessing here, but I bet, the entanglement just applies the same force, not the same movement.
**Ring ring**..
Flysurfer - Hello, Military?
Military - Yes?
Flysurfer - I have an idea..now imagine that we have a spacecraft infused with entangled particles would it be possible to reverse the wave collapse and thus turn the particles in the spacecraft back in to a wave (but still trapped within the craft) and send the entangled particles down a stream of photons... thus achieving light speed?
Because of 0 drag in space, we wouldn't even need that many particles.
CERN claim faster than light speed neutrinos.
The distance from the detector in Italy to the source in Geneva is about 730 km. The travel time at the speed of light is about 2.43 milliseconds, and the neutrinos appear to have outraced that speed by 60 nanoseconds. If true, that means they were traveling just a scosh faster than light, by about 1 part in 40,000. The neutrinos from SN1987A traveled so far that had they been moving that much faster than light, they would've arrived here almost four years before the light did. However, we saw the light from the supernova at roughly the same time as the neutrinos (actually the light did get here later, but it takes a little while for the explosion to eat its way out of the star's core to its surface, and that delay completely accounts for the lag seen).
But I wouldn't use that argument too strongly; perhaps this experiment creates neutrinos in a different way, or the neutrinos from this new experiment have different energies than ones created in the cores of supernovae (a good bet). Still, it's enough to make me even more skeptical of this FTL claim.
www.google.com.au/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8&ion=1&nord=1&gws_rd=ssl
I smashed my face on a door frame once not concentrating where i was going.
Do i win?
