Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Poll - Car Styling: Old School or New School?

Reply
Created by ikw777 > 9 months ago, 6 Apr 2013
cisco
QLD, 12345 posts
7 Apr 2013 11:24PM
Thumbs Up

MavericK040 said...


I really cant be bothered with an internet argument about engine technology, but you couldn't be more wrong. hardly a "best advancement" all it was is a rudimentary form of electronic spark retard and advance, to call that the best advancement in automotive engine control technology is madness!




I can't be bothered with an arguement either.
I am 62 and you are 22. I'll concede. You obviously know more than I.

MavericK040
WA, 583 posts
7 Apr 2013 9:45PM
Thumbs Up

Ive been a Mechanic and car nut for 7 years oh gracious one.
I'm 24 now , 22 is a distant memory.
But I will agree that reciprocating internal combustion engines are largely inefficient at an automotive level, and if we must use fossil fuels for motive power I suggest turbines driving electric generators and electric wheel motors. Not as crazy as it first seems.

Anyway this is a thread about car styling

Carantoc
WA, 6741 posts
7 Apr 2013 10:03PM
Thumbs Up

Old School or New School ?

With the greatest vehicle ever built you can admire both at the same time



FLYING ANT
WA, 75 posts
7 Apr 2013 10:13PM
Thumbs Up

EFI in the GT40-

FormulaNova
WA, 14811 posts
8 Apr 2013 6:56AM
Thumbs Up

Mark _australia said...
As much as I disagreed with Cisco he has a point. Reminiscing with a mate today, reminded of him running a 253 with no cooling system for about 5hrs in the garage, block was glowing dull red but it kept going. Shut it off and no way would it crank, it was seized. But when running it was running. Try that with modern motors with fine tolerances.



Funnily enough Mark, you can try that with a new Falcon six cylinder, and see how it goes. Try yours, not mine though.

They are designed with a system where they can keep going with no coolant, by alternating cylinders with no fuel or ignition, and keeping the engine cool. Sure, it won't glow red, and it will run fine afterwards, so you can't quite replicate the 253 experience It will also handle running with no coolant, under load, unlike the 253.

That's pretty good technology.


Or the newer Commodore motors. Overheating, so wanna rip out the thermostat? Nup. In every front engined car ever it has been top front (at the end of the top radiator hose). Noooo, now it is buried near the firewall and is a 4hr job, not a 15min job. Bad move for a hot country where a sticky thermostat could make you motionless halfway cross the nullabor. Cos a $10 part is inaccessable


Yeah, I think this comes from sourcing motors from FWD cars in the states. The VN commodore was the same.


Auto gearboxes? All computer controlled now and a nightmare for home rebuild. (Impossible)



Its not that bad. The gearboxes are similar, its just the control is done using solenoids using the ECU. You can still rebuild them.


Computer controlled interiors and dash (all linked in) is a nightmare - can't remove a globe without buggering the speedo, or a horn fuse without turning off brake lights and all that jazz. I have see a factory trained mechanic spend 6hrs tracing why a light would not work and had no idea. Days gone by, 10mins for a auto sparky with 100% success rate.


I think like always, this comes down to the particular mechanic and how good they are.



Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
8 Apr 2013 6:16PM
Thumbs Up

Don't know much about cars, but nearly bought one of these for my first car when I was 18...



Problem was - at 6'3", my legs didn't fit!

So ended up owning one of these instead...



One day - when I have time to 'tinker' again, I reckon one of these will do me...

dinsdale
WA, 1227 posts
8 Apr 2013 5:17PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...
if you're going to do internal combustion you can't beat pistons and crankshafts turbines.

Modern kero burners leave pistons coughing in the dust. Price is their problem.

Stubbies
WA, 1126 posts
8 Apr 2013 5:31PM
Thumbs Up

Sailhack said...
Don't know much about cars, but nearly bought one of these for my first car when I was 18...



Problem was - at 6'3", my legs didn't fit!




Piker, bought and learned to drive in a mustard yellow Triumph Stag. I was 6'4" at 18. But due to the leg room issue traded it with a mate for a Bedford Van...

Ian K
WA, 4055 posts
8 Apr 2013 5:50PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...
Ian K said...
if you're going to do internal combustion you can't beat pistons and crankshafts turbines.

Modern kero burners leave pistons coughing in the dust. Price is their problem.



Are turbines classed as internal combustion engines? Pretty noisy too I suppose.

Turns out they are but also called "continuous combustion" engines. Internal combustion normally refers to 2 strokes and 4 strokes.

Interesting point, so I went off and googled it. Looks like modern direct injection petrol engines can get up to 35% efficient, direct injection diesels up to 40%. Industrial gas turbines in combination with further power extraction devices on the hot exhaust up to 60%. Hard to get a straight answer on the figure in applications such as helicopters. The internet did say that because the efficiency dropped off sharply with revs, part-power applications weren't good. They tried them in buses, they ran very smoothly but the oil crisis stopped the project, in favour of more the efficient ( for stop/start auto applications ) 4 stroke engines.

Maybe mini turbines running flat out at 500,000 rpm would be the most efficient way to use kerosene to charge the batteries in the new hybrids?

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
8 Apr 2013 8:41PM
Thumbs Up

Sailhack said...
Don't know much about cars, but nearly bought one of these for my first car when I was 18...

Problem was - at 6'3", my legs didn't fit!

So ended up owning one of these instead...



One day - when I have time to 'tinker' again, I reckon one of these will do me...




Valiants!

MavericK040
WA, 583 posts
8 Apr 2013 7:45PM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...
dinsdale said...
Ian K said...
if you're going to do internal combustion you can't beat pistons and crankshafts turbines.

Modern kero burners leave pistons coughing in the dust. Price is their problem.



Are turbines classed as internal combustion engines? Pretty noisy too I suppose.

Turns out they are but also called "continuous combustion" engines. Internal combustion normally refers to 2 strokes and 4 strokes.

Interesting point, so I went off and googled it. Looks like modern direct injection petrol engines can get up to 35% efficient, direct injection diesels up to 40%. Industrial gas turbines in combination with further power extraction devices on the hot exhaust up to 60%. Hard to get a straight answer on the figure in applications such as helicopters. The internet did say that because the efficiency dropped off sharply with revs, part-power applications weren't good. They tried them in buses, they ran very smoothly but the oil crisis stopped the project, in favour of more the efficient ( for stop/start auto applications ) 4 stroke engines.

Maybe mini turbines running flat out at 500,000 rpm would be the most efficient way to use kerosene to charge the batteries in the new hybrids?


They are classed as internal combustion because combustion process takes place within the engine not externally ala steam engine.

Yeah they are inefficient at mid and low rpm which is why I suggested coupling it to a generator or something. Generators only need to be spun at one constant rpm which is a turbines most efficient state. yeah they are noisy, but I'm sure some efficient muffler system could sort that out.

Adoy
NSW, 238 posts
8 Apr 2013 9:49PM
Thumbs Up

93 model doesnt get much more aero dynamic and made rear spoiler to act as handy roof rack





MDSXR6T
WA, 1019 posts
8 Apr 2013 10:57PM
Thumbs Up

Remove the horrible rear spoiler and change the rim's and they are an unbelievable car with classic looks. Certainly ahead of its time.

Bulletproof drivetrain, an engine that has to be a top 5 production engine (not hypercar stuff) and maybe the last of the toyo's to have some passion behind it.

Nissan creates a new GTR that is mind boggling yet Toyo creates the '86. WUT

At least FPV have got the drivetrains and FI engines right.

superlizard
VIC, 702 posts
9 Apr 2013 8:16AM
Thumbs Up





kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
9 Apr 2013 10:12AM
Thumbs Up

MDSXR6T said...
Nissan creates a new GTR that is mind boggling yet Toyo creates the '86. WUT


One is $195,000 and the other is $35,000 with all the extras included. Not really comparable.

The 86 is a great thing. Not as wonderful as the car mags would have you believe, but still amazing value for money. To my mind they finally de-hairdressered the celica and made it for men instead of women, made it RWD and enough power to be fun (with plenty more if you want to throw another 10k at it).


doggie
WA, 15849 posts
9 Apr 2013 8:29AM
Thumbs Up

kiteboy dave said...
MDSXR6T said...
Nissan creates a new GTR that is mind boggling yet Toyo creates the '86. WUT


One is $195,000 and the other is $35,000 with all the extras included. Not really comparable.

The 86 is a great thing. Not as wonderful as the car mags would have you believe, but still amazing value for money. To my mind they finally de-hairdressered the celica and made it for men instead of women, made it RWD and enough power to be fun (with plenty more if you want to throw another 10k at it).





+1 the 86 is a performance car for the masses, it was long overdue tbh.

Hamsta
505 posts
9 Apr 2013 11:36AM
Thumbs Up

I am not fussed when it comes to cars, but I wouldn't mind a test drive in one of these......


ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
9 Apr 2013 4:08PM
Thumbs Up

A better looking Bugatti:


Stubbies
WA, 1126 posts
9 Apr 2013 8:39PM
Thumbs Up

New economies on an old concept...



dinsdale
WA, 1227 posts
9 Apr 2013 9:43PM
Thumbs Up

MavericK040 said...
Yeah they are inefficient at mid and low rpm which is why I suggested coupling it to a generator or something. Generators only need to be spun at one constant rpm which is a turbines most efficient state. yeah they are noisy, but I'm sure some efficient muffler system could sort that out.

That's why turbo props run at a constant 100%. Although some do have a ground idle setting, but even that's usually around the the 96% to 98% mark.

BenKirk
NSW, 600 posts
10 Apr 2013 10:27AM
Thumbs Up

These were some of the amazing cars at the final of the Louis Vuitton Classic Car competition outside of Monte Carlo. All were stunning. I like my black iLoad with alloys but not quite the same!





This was the winning car:

BenKirk
NSW, 600 posts
10 Apr 2013 10:29AM
Thumbs Up

This car barely got a look in and had to park around the corner!

Snowbum
NSW, 41 posts
11 Apr 2013 1:27PM
Thumbs Up

This is my actual car the first day I registered it.


It's currently in the mechanics yard getting a new gearbox to handle the power of the 8K engine I had built. Over the years it's evolved. The most recent photo.


I prefer old school.
Safety regulations from the the 70's on, determined a lot of the styling manufacturers did. There are some new cars I find very sexy, like the Veyron. Though someone on the net drew up what a 50's version might look like.

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
11 Apr 2013 4:24PM
Thumbs Up

Snowbum said...

I prefer old school.
Safety regulations from the the 70's on, determined a lot of the styling manufacturers did. There are some new cars I find very sexy, like the Veyron. Though someone on the net drew up what a 50's version might look like.



This is all kinds of awesome! (Love the VWs too)

Snowbum
NSW, 41 posts
12 Apr 2013 11:38AM
Thumbs Up

Yeah, now just waiting for someone to build it.
It took me a while to notice it's based on a VW beetle so it's totally doable!

TurtleHunter
WA, 1675 posts
12 Apr 2013 11:23AM
Thumbs Up

Ian K said...
cisco said...
I think you both missed my point, that being we are about 99.99% of us still driving around in piston/crank engined motor cars which is 100 year old technology.

EFI only goes so far. The mechanical losses in this type of engine are huge.



It's the thermodynamic losses that are huge, if you're going to do internal combustion you can't beat pistons and crankshafts. Rotaries have advantages but also disadvantages. The Sarich orbital just looked too complicated to ever compete.




Sarich created an injector using compressed air that sprayed the fuel molecules at a similar size to todays injectors but with fuel qualities from the 80's, Nothing complicated about it. Look at the omc injection and it is a lot more complicated yet they bought the licence.

CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
12 Apr 2013 1:54PM
Thumbs Up

Can't believe the HT Monaro is yet to make an appearance here yet. My dream car without a doubt.



thePup
13831 posts
12 Apr 2013 11:58AM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...
Can't believe the HT Monaro is yet to make an appearance here yet. My dream car without a doubt.






^^^^
Simply magnificent CM - love that

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
12 Apr 2013 2:26PM
Thumbs Up

^^^^ but not with those inappropriate wheels surely? Classics need to be on period correct wheels and tyres to look good. Needs sidewall.

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
12 Apr 2013 2:30PM
Thumbs Up

Snowbum said...
Yeah, now just waiting for someone to build it.
It took me a while to notice it's based on a VW beetle so it's totally doable!



Imagine it done on a beetle floorpan with a mid-mounted air-cooled flat four or six, painted steel dash with a minimum of gauges and a cream or tan leather interior.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Poll - Car Styling: Old School or New School?" started by ikw777