doggie said...Woodo said...
Worship or Believe in whatever you like. It's your life. Do what you want.
Just don't push your****** religion on anyone else! Simple really.
(.Y.)
Jeez mate you could have said that on the first page
![](https://www.seabreeze.com.au/images/forums/icon_smile_wink.gif)
(.).)
![](https://www.seabreeze.com.au/images/forums/icon_smile_cool.gif)
edit> dam it, three pages now!!
Would there be 2 billion Muslims if it wasn't pushed onto other people?
No, people who aren't raised into Islam rarely join it under their own motivation!
"No Bacon or Sex? Prayer 5 times a day? In Arabic? No thanks.. "
If people didn't push it upon gullible adolescents then there would be nobody knocking on Busters door on Sundays.. Simple really..
But thats not the case, so it must be held accountable, and the best way to do that is with laughter! The most powerful weapon available..
superlizard said...
even using terms such as "Rainbow Serpent" to me demonstrates one sidedness and not approaching ideas with open mind but just using opportunity to mock something. Just because most religions sheepishly claim about white bearded god creating planet with a magic wand, doesn't mean that there isn't a valid intellectual argument about intelligence behind complexities of life as opposed to random chance.
First there is nothing random about evolution, mutations are random, but the selection process is anything but.
Can you explain to me the valid intellectual argument for this intelligence? Or point me in the direction of an intelligent argument for this?
for example, i've seen some very plausible in-depth scientific analysis to support evolution. But i've also seen some equally very plausible in-depth scientific analysis to point towards case of intelligent designer. I'm not claiming which one is more valid than the other, but i fully recognise that both sides of the argument have very valid claims backed up by science/logic etc.
Can you provide a source?
If you propose an Intelligent Designer to explain Complexity then you must explain this Intelligent Designer.
Anything capable of creating the universe would have to be far more complicated than the universe it created.. < This is the fundamental flaw with ID, it postulates something infinitely more complex to answer the problem of complexity.. It's Bunk..