Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

The Gillard File

Reply
Created by Simondo > 9 months ago, 8 Jul 2011
kk
WA, 947 posts
8 Jul 2011 11:40PM
Thumbs Up

Fantastic win by the Eagles!!!!!

Pugwash
WA, 7671 posts
8 Jul 2011 11:50PM
Thumbs Up

kk said...

So come on formulanova... whats your job???


Full forward for the bulldogs

adolf
1862 posts
8 Jul 2011 11:53PM
Thumbs Up

I was a labor/green voter right up until the day that the govt caved in to the mining tax.

Personally, I thought the mining tax was a very good idea - it made a great deal of sense to me.

Then the ads started on TV and the stupid Labor party, in their wisdom, caved in to a couple of rich people complaining about it.

I won't forgive them for that.

Bye Bye Julia, Bye buddy bye - you've lost me.

I also used to think Bob Brown was a good guy until I saw his sneaky global ambitions:



Wow - he's lost me!

Pugwash
WA, 7671 posts
8 Jul 2011 11:58PM
Thumbs Up

A revenues based tax in place of a royalties based tax is a good idea and was initially proposed by the resources sector.

A zero consultation, you'll do what we tell you tax was not. Ken Henry. What a goose.

FormulaNova
WA, 14734 posts
9 Jul 2011 6:48AM
Thumbs Up

kk said...

So come on formulanova... whats your job??? You've dodged the question so far... Can't you work out what lie to tell next..

What a joke!!


Sorry, mummy said I had to switch off the computer and go to bed... Different timezone and all.

Ahemmm - I am back now.

So what was your poorly articulated question that you tried to ask? You seem to have forgotten that one about money and concentrated on what I do for a living. Why? Do you not care how money works or do you not care to understand where you were wrong?

The thing with written communication is that your readers cannot read your mind. I don't know what is in your head,so you must write it down.

What do I do for a living? Well I work in public relations for a major political party.

Nah, just joking. I work with those computer things and connect them together for people so that they can send messages and stuff.

Thanks for your interest in my life.

What sort of car do you drive and have you ever seen a Qentin Tarantino movie? What is your favorite one?

FormulaNova
WA, 14734 posts
9 Jul 2011 7:23AM
Thumbs Up


Hi KK, lets analyse your little bit of logic here... lets see why my understanding of economics is different to yours. Party politics removed, lets just talk economics.

kk said...

So you need a goverment that gives employers (you may call them greedy bosses) confidence to do business and employ peole so that they can pay taxes and pay off this goverments current debt.. Last time I did a quick calculation it was around $40,000 per tax payer. At least it's not as bad as Greece where it is $250k per tax payer, but we have gone from a credit of ?? (can't remember the surplus the lib gov left) to a debt of?? in what? 4 years... can anyone here speak greek (took them 20 years)


It seems like you are arguing that bosses need to have confidence to do business by having a government with no debt or even a surplus. Is that correct? Money in the bank and all that good stuff?

Okay, so do you understand where that debt or surplus comes from? Of course you do, the income is from taxation and the expenditure is funding of projects, welfare, the public service and infrastructure.

So, the same or more tax and less spending equals a surplus yeah? (Good) The same or less tax and more spending equals a deficit yeah? (in debt = Bad!)

Okay, so if the government decides to run a budget surplus, and takes more in taxes than it spends in the economy, the amount of cash in the economy dries up. People have less money to spend, more people are unemployed, and taxes are higher.

On the other hand, a government decides to run a deficit budget and spends money like its going out of style, taxes the same or less and spends more than it did in previous years. It spends it on projects, welfare, the public service and infrastructure. There is nothing else to spend it on, so it has to go to one of those. People have more money to spend, there are more people fully employed, and there might even be tax breaks.

Tell me again which environment you would feel more confident in and why.

As a business owner, do you prefer it when other people have more money or when they have less?

As a business owner in retail, do you prefer it when people have more money?

As a business owner in construction, do you prefer it when the government has more money to spend and is handing it out willy-nilly to first home buyers, insulation installers, solar panel installers, and for construction projects?

As a public servant, would you feel more confident in your job if you know the government is adding more jobs to the public service or less? Would you be more likely to build a new house if there were more public service jobs or less? Would you buy more clothes if there were more public service jobs or less?

If you were a business owner in retail or construction, would you prefer that the guy in the public service was feeling more secure or less?

There are no tricks to these questions. I am just trying to understand where we see things differently.



log man
VIC, 8289 posts
9 Jul 2011 12:04PM
Thumbs Up

adolf said...

I was a labor/green voter right up until the day that the govt caved in to the mining tax.

Personally, I thought the mining tax was a very good idea - it made a great deal of sense to me.

Then the ads started on TV and the stupid Labor party, in their wisdom, caved in to a couple of rich people complaining about it.

I won't forgive them for that.

Bye Bye Julia, Bye buddy bye - you've lost me.

I also used to think Bob Brown was a good guy until I saw his sneaky global ambitions:



Wow - he's lost me!


I'd be happy with Browns vision if it ended poverty and war

cisco
QLD, 12337 posts
10 Jul 2011 1:38PM
Thumbs Up

log man said...
I'd be happy with Browns vision if it ended poverty and war


Brown's "vision" is all about war and poverty. War against the people and bringing all but the .1% ruling elite down to the same level of poverty.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"The Gillard File" started by Simondo