Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
  Surf Cameras
  Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
General
Gps & Speed Sailing
Wave Sailing
Foiling
Gear Reviews
Lost & Found
Windsurfing WA
Windsurfing NSW
Windsurfing QLD
Windsurfing Victoria
Windsurfing SA
Windsurfing Tasmania
General
Gear Reviews
Foiling
Newbies / Tips & Tricks
Lost & Found
Western Australia
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
South Australia
Tasmania
General
Foiling
Board Talk & Reviews
Wing Foiling
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
  Active Topics
  Subscribed Topics
  Rules & Guidelines
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)
  Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
Surf Cameras
Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
Active Topics
Subscribed Topics
Forum Rules
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

To Invest in property or ?

Reply
Created by ok > 9 months ago, 19 Nov 2013
ok
NSW, 1089 posts
19 Nov 2013 11:01PM
Thumbs Up

At a financial stage in my life where Im looking to invest some money for my future and so I stop spending it on toys and so I dont have to work my arse off for the rest of my life! As I have previously posted on here looking for advice and received positive responses I thought I would do it again! If any of you would like to share you advices / experiences on whether or not it is a good idea to buy a small house do it up, rent it out ETC or if you have any ideas how I can secure my money and it make a gradual profit it would be greatly appreciated!!

Pitbull
WA, 1267 posts
19 Nov 2013 8:14PM
Thumbs Up

Pay off all your debts, then save up for what you want. Live it up 'cause you're not going to live for ever.

Battle
536 posts
19 Nov 2013 9:39PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
ok said..

At a financial stage in my life where Im looking to invest some money for my future and so I stop spending it on toys and so I dont have to work my arse off for the rest of my life! As I have previously posted on here looking for advice and received positive responses I thought I would do it again! If any of you would like to share you advices / experiences on whether or not it is a good idea to buy a small house do it up, rent it out ETC or if you have any ideas how I can secure my money and it make a gradual profit it would be greatly appreciated!!


I don't have the answer, but I can tell you from my own experiences that "buy a small house do it up, rent it out ETC" = "work my arse off"

cisco
QLD, 12353 posts
19 Nov 2013 11:48PM
Thumbs Up

Real Estate is like Sex.

You should get as much of both as you possibly can while you are still young.

theDoctor
NSW, 5784 posts
20 Nov 2013 1:15AM
Thumbs Up



go the house option

buy a small house

rent it out

but don't do it up

get it tidy maybe

key is to slum lord it

if they stay on top of the rent

make a couple small repairs per year, as incentive to stay on top of the rent (and gives you some thing to claim on at tax time)

location is still everything

Battle
536 posts
19 Nov 2013 10:27PM
Thumbs Up

^ slum lord = tenants don't pay on a regular basis, and they break s**t because it's not their own.

theDoctor
NSW, 5784 posts
20 Nov 2013 1:51AM
Thumbs Up



the last house i bought had 150 people apply to rent it,

the ones it went to can't afford not to pay rent

there's 149 people fighting to take their place



pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
19 Nov 2013 11:26PM
Thumbs Up

For once in my life I have to agree with the doctor.
I would have to assume that means I must be wrong, but I still agree with him.

Buy an old house in a good place.
Look at holding it for at least 10 to 20 years.
On the coast is the best because we only have so much coastline and we can't add any more.
Whereas we have acres of other land and we can always develop more.

The value is in the land so a big block with a crappy but rentable house is the best option.
If there is the possibility of it being rezoned to higher density that is even better.

Make sure the house is rentable though because it's the rent that helps pay the mortgage.
Again, on the coast makes it easy to rent for a good price because lots of young people don't give a toss about the house so long as they can walk to the beach.
Also, if it's a mediocre house you don't get so stressed about tennants not lookng after it. And they seldom do.

I know the price of houses by the beach seem expensive. They always do.
But they still appreciate more than houses elsewhere so if you can stretch things to a coastal property, do it.

But it is hard work cleanng up after the yobs have left the place in a mess so don't go into it thinking it's all just easy money. It's not.

Battle
536 posts
20 Nov 2013 12:01AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
theDoctor said..



the last house i bought had 150 people apply to rent it,

the ones it went to can't afford not to pay rent

there's 149 people fighting to take their place





Lucky you, I own a triplex and went almost 6 months with 2 apts empty, and then yearly turn over until things settled and finally have decent tenants. Now the place pays for itself, and a bit more, but it was pretty sketch for a while. The tenants have more rights than the evil landlord, and can stop paying for months before you can do anything. Meanwhile who pays the mortgage. ? It's gone as soon as I can make a bit of profit.

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
20 Nov 2013 7:57AM
Thumbs Up

Shares - I'm no expert but some general priciples: best time to buy in was during GFC. Now is probably ok but the big gains have been had. Europe at 5 year highs, US up n down with shutdown/debt ceiling etc but generally at post-GFC highs and doing well. So - not a terrible time to buy but don't expect big gains either. People want secure, dependable growth/returns in turbulent times, so secure stocks become very expensive. Small share trades not really worth it, as you have $20-30 buy and sell costs for each transaction to overcome before you make profit. So you need to chuck in the equivalent of a house to make those costs irrelevant.

Property - for investment I would aim for something very low maintenance and essentially unbreakable. Unit or a small, neat, simple brick house on a small tidy block. I don't know where the doctor is but don't expect 150 applications. Tenants don't really care but if you buy right, they can't do all that much damage.

Tycho
18 posts
20 Nov 2013 7:11AM
Thumbs Up

If you go the house option go for backpackers, but only female Asians(I'm not being racist, but they are the clean ones). Get WIFI for them, like 500GB, and a landline(Make sure they aren't allowed to make outgoing overseas calls).
You can charge them a bucket load!

P.S. This is what my brother is about to do. I'll let ya know how it goes...if I can remember:P

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
20 Nov 2013 10:19AM
Thumbs Up

Re Doctor vs Battle's comments - both are very valid.

Property is good if you can buy at the right price. If you buy a slum and don't at least make it respectable (ie; try to rent it to the lowest denominator), you'll be very lucky if it doesn't get trashed. If you spend too much on it - you will struggle getting a return.

We have a couple of different long-term rentals, my old workshop and a newly designed/built 'Access' townhouse (wheelchair compliant) which I designed and helped with the build (ex-chippy). Although (like Battle) at this point of time they are meeting mortgage repayments - they were both vacant for nearly a year, so we had to reduce the rent in order to get them occupied. That year completely shredded our savings, and if a buyer came along, I'd be happy to offload them. Although I still believe that property is a good investment, I'm very cautious now about over capitalising.

On the flip-side, many people I know have 'cheap' rentals and don't maintain them to a high standard - they get bottom-feeders as tenants and each time the tenants vacate or get evicted due to not paying rent, there's a massive clean-up needed, renovations to repair damage and it costs them more than they make on rent.

For your first property investment - look for;
1. A good location away from the bronx - a MUST (although ex-housing commission areas can be attractive investments if all houses are privatised.)
2. Somewhere you can keep an eye on it, without getting involved or being a nosy landlord.
3. A small and well-maintained house/unit requiring minimal ongoing maintenance.
4. A RE agent with a good rep in property management (for the cost of their fees & the sh!t they deal with, it's not worth DIY).
&
5. Possibly a place that you & family can stay at when vacated for a holiday or for a change of scenery.

FlySurfer
NSW, 4460 posts
20 Nov 2013 10:44AM
Thumbs Up

I've been SO wrong with regard to investments... I've lost on everything even my hedges. I mean FFS why have coffee futures 1/2 in the past 2 years?

Anyway... property. Australia has the most inflated property in the world after Canada, Singapore in 3rd... but they have fundamentals.

Canada and Australia have huge bubbles created by the Chinese trying to divest from the USD... go to an auction is Sydney and there's a good chance the auctioneer will bilingual Mandarin/English and everyone will look Chinese.

There's an existential risk that the bubble could pop at any time... losing $300k in a year won't be funny.

I also see a lot of Chinese developments (apartment blocks) in and around Sydney... there are 4 within 1km of where I live. This will have keep a sealing on rental income + there's been no wage inflation.

But like I said, I've lost on EVERY investment of mine. I predicted the GFC down to the month, and I've done ok in the past, but I haven't got a clue any more... I'm just going to sit it out.

I recently lost out on a property in London (GBP135k) ~ $250k with all fees for a 2 bedroom unit in Uxbridge (close to Heathrow)... an equivalent property over here would cost $600k.

Mobydisc
NSW, 9029 posts
20 Nov 2013 11:41AM
Thumbs Up

Its hard to say whether property is a good investment now. Property prices seem quite high around Sydney. However rents are high too. If you can buy a two bedroom walk up flat for around $300K to $350K it should be almost positively geared with today's low interest rates.

I bought an investment property on the Central Coast of NSW a couple of years ago. The house is a bit of a dump but we were able to renovate a granny flat underneath. We did most of the work ourselves except for plumbing, electrical and gyprocking the ceiling. This kept the costs down. The combined rent now makes the place profitable which is handy. The rent for each is place is lower than the market rates so the tenants are happy to stay there. I'm happy too with the rent received. I have to do a few repairs every now and then however the tenants are happy when I do it. Repairs probably cost me about $1000 a year.

I think the key to successful property renting is to do the minimal amount of work as possible and have the property in an area of high rental demand. Its also a good idea to do a lot preventative maintenance before a tenant moves in such as change batteries of fire alarms, replace tap washers, replace light bulbs. Stuff like that because it sucks getting calls from the agent or tenant because a tap is dripping or the light doesn't work.


sausage
QLD, 4873 posts
20 Nov 2013 1:40PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
kiteboy dave said..

............... People want secure, dependable growth/returns in turbulent times, so secure stocks become very expensive. Small share trades not really worth it, as you have $20-30 buy and sell costs for each transaction to overcome before you make profit. So you need to chuck in the equivalent of a house to make those costs irrelevant.



Umm how do you figure that a $30 trade needs to be negated with a share purchase equivalent to the price of a house e.g. if I purchase 300 shares in say BHP at $37.50 ($11,250 total cost) my $30 trade through Commsec only equates to less than 0.3% of my total holding or 10cents per share. Don't know where I can buy a house for $11,250, do you?

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
20 Nov 2013 1:52PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
sausage said..

kiteboy dave said..

............... People want secure, dependable growth/returns in turbulent times, so secure stocks become very expensive. Small share trades not really worth it, as you have $20-30 buy and sell costs for each transaction to overcome before you make profit. So you need to chuck in the equivalent of a house to make those costs irrelevant.



Umm how do you figure that a $30 trade needs to be negated with a share purchase equivalent to the price of a house e.g. if I purchase 300 shares in say BHP at $37.50 ($11,250 total cost) my $30 trade through Commsec only equates to less than 0.3% of my total holding or 10cents per share. Don't know where I can buy a house for $11,250, do you?


To a degree you're right, comment was there as a lot of people think they'll get rich buying $500 of this one month and $500 of that next month. $12,000 lots are far more realistic.

If you'd purchased 300 BHP shares in '95 you'd have doubled your initial $6000 . (round figures)
If you'd put it in the bank term deposit with compound interest at 5% you'd have $14,500 (round figures)

Not saying shares are bad, just that you need a significant trade size to make them work, and then it's a gamble.

Poida
WA, 1917 posts
20 Nov 2013 12:39PM
Thumbs Up

re BHP, add up the dividends also
there was a stock split also in that time 2:1
you would have done alright in BHP over that time

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
20 Nov 2013 4:08PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
FlySurfer said..

I've been SO wrong with regard to investments... I've lost on everything even my hedges. I mean FFS why have coffee futures 1/2 in the past 2 years?

Anyway... property. Australia has the most inflated property in the world after Canada, Singapore in 3rd... but they have fundamentals.

Canada and Australia have huge bubbles created by the Chinese trying to divest from the USD... go to an auction is Sydney and there's a good chance the auctioneer will bilingual Mandarin/English and everyone will look Chinese.

There's an existential risk that the bubble could pop at any time... losing $300k in a year won't be funny.

I also see a lot of Chinese developments (apartment blocks) in and around Sydney... there are 4 within 1km of where I live. This will have keep a sealing on rental income + there's been no wage inflation.

But like I said, I've lost on EVERY investment of mine. I predicted the GFC down to the month, and I've done ok in the past, but I haven't got a clue any more... I'm just going to sit it out.

I recently lost out on a property in London (GBP135k) ~ $250k with all fees for a 2 bedroom unit in Uxbridge (close to Heathrow)... an equivalent property over here would cost $600k.


Not disagreeing with you Fly, but from my experiences with property investments located in small cities/towns (ie; away from the city lights) is that they are not 'over-inflated' and there's no huge bubble to pop. The downside is that although a steady income can be gained - it's hard to go full-cappo on a small investment in the country. The upside is that any downward movement will be steady and it gives 'slickers' somewhere away from the bustle to get away from it all when the property is vacated.

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
20 Nov 2013 8:38PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Sailhack said..
there's no huge bubble to pop. ...any downward movement will be steady ...


Yes yes yes yes yes a million times yes. Our "bubble" was supposed to be popping in 2006 and every year after, death crosses and awful recessions and almighty property bubble pops.

Not happening. Slow, slight, steady deflation at worst.

/ps if I ever meet Steve Keen in person I'll happily strangle they little shyster...

patsken
WA, 708 posts
20 Nov 2013 7:59PM
Thumbs Up

Done/doing both.....

Gotta say that shares are more exciting and "fun" than property but then I haven't had the experience of seeing a property dropping in price substantially from my purchase price - I've seen it many times with shares and if you are a nervous type of "investor" then put it in the bank/super fund.

Most people are not as good as they think they are or will be at investing (including me) so unless you are willing to lock your money up in super until you're able to access it then................spend it now !!!! Industry super funds are good when you're in your 50's + because the length of time to access it is short.

I've made money (not large amounts) both ways but I will say that if your aims are short(ish) term then go for shares because they're always easier to sell than houses but if you are able to see the long game then go for Industry Super is my advice - for what it's worth....

busterwa
3777 posts
20 Nov 2013 11:16PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Pitbull said..

Pay off all your debts, then save up for what you want. Live it up 'cause you're not going to live for ever.


Dont save up for a house completely get a good deposit and then get a morgage.

Houses devalues with technology and trends. land values.

The cost of a brick will always in increase never decrease! Over time the brick gets smaller to keep the prices down!

dont be fooled.
If your renting clear out all other debits dont buy a 2013 kite that you dont need and throw it at a house deposit ! - if you dont own a house defer all non essential spending and save !

pueter66
QLD, 205 posts
21 Nov 2013 7:06AM
Thumbs Up

I have houses and shares and I have found that the have houses have outperformed the shares investment i made in the last ten years, though saying that i wouldn't say that either have knocked my socks off, I have coastal property and properties in the city, the coastal properties have been better for capital growth but they have been harder to find good tenants for than those in the city, I generally buy mid range houses in Rockhampton on the CQ coast which are not yet overpriced but have a really good tenancy rate, Capital growth is lower but the loans pay for them selves, I buy older timber walled homes which are more solid and the tenants cant punch holes in the wall. I have often wondered if I would just be better off saving money in the bank and working on compound interest, one of the financial gurus might have an idea on this one.
good luck, Oh and the shares I buy have been BHP, they have still performed ok, Good Luck

Captain Bob
WA, 160 posts
21 Nov 2013 10:30AM
Thumbs Up

House has slowly gone up. I just watch my shares go up then down then back up then back down. Most are up at the moment. Bought everything through the GFC which worked well.

seafever17
WA, 360 posts
21 Nov 2013 11:17AM
Thumbs Up

I like property.

You can drive past it. Even if the market crashes that house will still be there. You cannot say that about shares. Potentially bigger gains in shares but also possibility of losing the lot.Your retirement funds are to important to gamble with on shares alone. Buy property as the main investment and then give yourself 10 grand to play with on the sharemarket and see how you go and get it out of your system.
As others have said buy on the beach side of the main arterial road. I.E in Perth, northern suburbs buy west of Marmion avenue. This translates well to any Australian Coastal city pretty well

Property has a great record and tax deductions too.





Beaglebuddy
1595 posts
21 Nov 2013 2:37PM
Thumbs Up

Tenants, you will be very lucky to find good ones. The perfect tenants are the quiet professional retired couple but I never found them.
Here are your options;
1. Seemingly nice young couple with kids, their kids will destroy the place, never rent to people with kids. Everything will be fine until they move out and you discover the damage.
2. Room mates, endless problems with getting the rent and drama, never accept rent checks from different room mates, only take one check a month from the one person on the lease, if you take a separate check from a room mate you could end up having to evict multiple people instead of just one.
3. Young unmarried couple with no kids, sounds good but they will break up and the one person left will not be able to make the rent, usually the man, he'll bring in one of his buddies to live there but it won't work because his buddy is irresponsible and has no money either.
4. Working class couple with grown children that don't live with them. A common option, on the plus side they have steady jobs and at their age they will be responsible enough to make the rent but they are alcoholics, will never fix anything or tell you it's broke and will slowly and steadily piss off the neighbors.
How's this? Get a place you can vacation rental, your income will vary a lot and the expenses will be high but there will be cleaners in there every week and even the slightest nick can be taken from the renters deposit.

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
21 Nov 2013 10:35PM
Thumbs Up

^^^A bit of pessimism there beagle?

To date I've had most types of tenants and none have done what you describe. Also, be very mindful that 'holiday accommodation' attracts commercial costs in Aus which will devour your profit.

bjornshak
NSW, 15 posts
21 Nov 2013 11:54PM
Thumbs Up

Trying both, not really impressed by either. Still working like a dog and the funds seems to take money. Doing the day trade thing after doing some study. Plenty to know. Seems to be about what your appetite is for risk and understand what your money is going into after plenty of homework.

cisco
QLD, 12353 posts
22 Nov 2013 1:47AM
Thumbs Up

Real Estate values are always relative, always cyclic and in the long term, always rise.

It is like the customer who went into a Real Estate agent's shop and said he was looking for an investment property.

The agent asked "Would that be a long term investment?"

The customer asked "Is there any other kind?"

pueter66
QLD, 205 posts
22 Nov 2013 7:54PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Beaglebuddy said..

Tenants, you will be very lucky to find good ones. The perfect tenants are the quiet professional retired couple but I never found them.
Here are your options;
1. Seemingly nice young couple with kids, their kids will destroy the place, never rent to people with kids. Everything will be fine until they move out and you discover the damage.
2. Room mates, endless problems with getting the rent and drama, never accept rent checks from different room mates, only take one check a month from the one person on the lease, if you take a separate check from a room mate you could end up having to evict multiple people instead of just one.
3. Young unmarried couple with no kids, sounds good but they will break up and the one person left will not be able to make the rent, usually the man, he'll bring in one of his buddies to live there but it won't work because his buddy is irresponsible and has no money either.
4. Working class couple with grown children that don't live with them. A common option, on the plus side they have steady jobs and at their age they will be responsible enough to make the rent but they are alcoholics, will never fix anything or tell you it's broke and will slowly and steadily piss off the neighbors.
How's this? Get a place you can vacation rental, your income will vary a lot and the expenses will be high but there will be cleaners in there every week and even the slightest nick can be taken from the renters deposit.


My Rockhampton Tenants fit all those descriptions good honest country folk all, Sorry Rocky











saltiest1
NSW, 2510 posts
23 Nov 2013 1:18AM
Thumbs Up

worst house in best street

adolf
1862 posts
22 Nov 2013 10:34PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
kiteboy dave said..

If you'd purchased 300 BHP shares in '95 you'd have doubled your initial $6000 . (round figures)
If you'd put it in the bank term deposit with compound interest at 5% you'd have $14,500 (round figures)


This isn't quite right - in 95' BHP was around $8 today they are $38 so that would make it closer to $11,500. If you bought bank shares you could double that again.

It would be an interesting exercise to actually work out, rather than relying on half baked facts made by internet clowns. My feeling is that it would work out similar, when tax/fees is taken out - any accountant types willing to take this on?

With BHP shares you get fully franked dividends twice a year, this income could to be reinvested, but at the end you do have to pay capital gains tax.

With the term deposit, the rates would have fluctuated and you have to pay income tax on the interest each year, reducing the compound interest.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"To Invest in property or ?" started by ok