Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

What would you do if you governed South Korea?

Reply
Created by FlySurfer > 9 months ago, 28 Nov 2010
FlySurfer
NSW, 4453 posts
28 Nov 2010 2:55PM
Thumbs Up

This is a challenging one, but the truth is I don't think I could do much... except.

I would secretly invest money in a satellite based tungsten rod delivery system (kinetic bombardment)... and try and take out the dear leader and top generals.

But I think the Chinese are trying to play games too. NK depends on China and wouldn't do anything to upset their only friend.

The US is having war games in the Yellow sea... WTF! Talk about stoking the flames, this sh!t could blow quickly. Imagine what the US would do if NK and China had war games in the gulf of Mexico?

Anyway how do folk reckon this whole things gona play out? It's looking serious if you examine and put together the recent behind the scene news.

India <> US (arms/energy) deals
Vietnam <> US
Oz <> US (more troops)
Indonesia <> US
Pak <> China (energy/weapons)
Africa <> China (everything)

While I doubt anything will happen soon the next 10 years maybe interesting.

Mobydisc
NSW, 9028 posts
28 Nov 2010 3:53PM
Thumbs Up

Seems like the South Koreans are sick of the North. With one of their navy boats blown up a few months ago and now this going on perhaps the South is saying "enough is enough".

The problem is the North Korean government is between a rock and a hard place. They can't open up the country like the Chinese have. If they do the North Koreans will soon find out ordinary South Koreans are living an incredibly prosperous lifestyle.

War should be avoided in any way possible. Nothing good happens out of war and its unbelievable the US would be prepared to start another war while they are bogged down in two other wars and their domestic economy is going down the drain.

The best way forward is for the North Korean people to learn whats going on in the outside world. Thereby they will learn they unnecessarily suffer because of their government which has self serving policies designed to keep it in power through isolation. Basically open up all the borders and trade as much as possible. Open up contact through any means and cost as necessary. Flood the place with free mobile phones and so on. If this means pandering to unreasonable North Korean government demands then that is the price to pay.

The second best policy is to encourage China to completely close the border. Close off the border and basically destroy the North Korean economy. By this the people of North Korea will hopefully overthrow their government.


Hopefully war is avoided but it sounds like both sides want war.

Mark _australia
WA, 22284 posts
28 Nov 2010 1:17PM
Thumbs Up

Moby reminded me of the old saying -

War does not decide who is right.
War only decides who is left

However with the case of clear aggression from the north, the south should bomb the blazes out of them. Trouble is then other countries will enter the conflict and it would be messy

theDoctor
NSW, 5778 posts
28 Nov 2010 6:14PM
Thumbs Up



eat lots of kimchi

choco
SA, 4027 posts
28 Nov 2010 5:48PM
Thumbs Up

The North has one of the largest armies in the world! they didn't build this force up simply to march at cermonies, $hit will hit the fan big time!

FlySurfer
NSW, 4453 posts
28 Nov 2010 6:51PM
Thumbs Up

There are a number of issues that complicate the situation.

1.- NK government is in decline and the army aren't happy.

2.- China is supporting the army and government to make sure it doesn't fall cos if it does SK will take over, best situation for all except China. China would then be completely encircled by America allies except for Russia... even Mongolia and some SCO countries are openly friendly to the western allies.

3.- NK citizens have been completely brain washed and believe the south is an American puppet, and the US guarding the border and sending boats in just plays in to the propaganda... so a lot of North Koreans want to liberate the south.

4.- The north has the bomb and could hit all US bases in SK and Japan.

So without China's influence we'd end up with 1 Korea in < 3 years. But China understandably wants to grow its influence.
It's started to push around it's neighbours economically (Japan/Vietnam/Laos/Mongolia) and the only country keeping it in check is the US... who pushes around every body anyway.
The US it's straightening it's allies and fostering new counter weights to China, read India and even trying to stir civil unrest in western China (Uighurs).

So it looks like a cold war is brewing... what effect that will have on trade is uncertain but in the long run it will have to have some effect or else it's all just meaningless pandering.

The scary thing is we live in such a world of mainstream disinformation we won't know until it's happened.

I know from the laws of nature that no new power rises by letting another push it around... they fight and it's either a draw or somebody wins.

Speaking of which I saw 2 male leopards have a fight...

I think it's this:

Elroy Jetson
WA, 706 posts
28 Nov 2010 7:39PM
Thumbs Up

My simplistic view on the complicated world of International Politics.

It has been rumoured that the North Korean Supreme Leader, Kim Jong-il is ill. It was thought/guessed that he may have suffered a stroke earlier this year. It has be recently reported that he may have Panceatic cancer.

His 3rd son, Kim Jong-un, has been elevated up the ranks of the Korean workers party. He is young and inexperienced (no military experience) and will require the support of the military to continue in his Father's footsteps. The recent confrontations with South Korea could be seen as a way to divert the North Korean military's attention/resources in an attempt to bolster support for Kim Jong-il and help pave the way for his son, Kim Jong-un, to become the next Supreme leader.

Having said that. What happens inside North Korea is a bit of a side show. Without any outside help North Korea could easily be defeated by many other countries in the world including South Korea.

I agree with what has been said about China. The reality of the situation is that China is part of the equation. With it's massive economic growth China is expected to be a regional power/super power over the following decades. It certainly isn't considering any possibility of the west closing in on it's borders.

So probably the best thing for South Korea/US to do atm is put pressure on North Korea by putting pressure on it's strongest allie China. I would imagine that China would be unhappy that recent North Korean actions have resulted in an increased build up of the US navy right on it's doorstep. China will likely threaten to withdraw some of their support to North Korea if the leadership doesn't tone down it's confrontations with the west.


Heard a rational lecture on Radio national recently about China's upcoming place in international politics. Here it is in case someone on seabreeze is interested:

www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/bigideas/a-gathering-storm---chinas-challenge-to-us-power/2977234

Carantoc
WA, 6561 posts
28 Nov 2010 7:45PM
Thumbs Up

I am not supporting North Korea, but I would like to point out that ths US and South Korea were playing major mock land and sea war exercises immediately before (and after) the North fired missiles. Grab a map and take a look where that island (and the war games arena) is located, a tiny SK pimple surrounded by NK territory.

Now, NK claimed that SK fired first.

In my mind I can see that it is entirely possible that :
The US and SK war games are designed in part (or in most) to intimidate NK
A US or SK missle or shell went astray and landed in NK territory

Not saying that makes it OK to fire back, just saying that doesn't make it OK for western journalists to broadcast that NK shelled SK, without perhaps divulging some of these other 'facts'. OK, so maybe not all are facts, but NK claiming SK fired first is a fact that got missed off most 7pm broadcasts, so maybe a few more minor details got omitted as well ?


Perhaps the governers of SK should play war games further away from NK territory as a first sign of unilateral goodwill ?

SandS
VIC, 5904 posts
28 Nov 2010 10:47PM
Thumbs Up


I would go to conferance in Australia , and disapear never to be seen again.

Mark _australia
WA, 22284 posts
28 Nov 2010 8:29PM
Thumbs Up

They should call in Team America - "F&*k Yeah!!!"

FlySurfer
NSW, 4453 posts
29 Nov 2010 12:47AM
Thumbs Up

Kim is a closet homo and with 0 military experience too. His son is another farked up idiot that's one of the reasons why the military isn't happy.
Another is cos they either fight and rally national support or lose control.

China wants the North to slow down/take it ez cos China needs more time to build offensive capability and for the US to weaken.

US wants the North to implode and China to play it's card while the US still controls its energy routes or to open it's economy (float currency, liberalise, privatise) so they can tinker and reassert their dominance.

Within the next couple years a couple US states will go bankrupt, US needs something to pull out of a hat cos printing greenbacks isn't gona work.


Interesting times ahead and don't think if the $hit hit's the fan we're not gona end up sticking like it.

Jimbob McBoilygroin
QLD, 82 posts
28 Nov 2010 11:55PM
Thumbs Up

i wood ware my brown undys

NowindSurfer
WA, 163 posts
28 Nov 2010 10:15PM
Thumbs Up

There will be heavy casualties on the north korean The western world is far to powerful to let a renegade leader threaten it.

Elroy Jetson
WA, 706 posts
29 Nov 2010 10:41AM
Thumbs Up

Carantoc said...

I am not supporting North Korea, but I would like to point out that ths US and South Korea were playing major mock land and sea war exercises immediately before (and after) the North fired missiles.


And your point is? Earlier this year, months before the US and South Korea were involved in Naval exercises in the yellow sea, a North Korean sub sank a South Korean general purpose vessel killing all sailors on board.

"A North Korean submarine's torpedo sank a South Korean navy ship on 26 March causing the deaths of 46 sailors, an international report has found."

www.bbc.co.uk/news/10129703


How far should we go back. We could back track the politics for the present tension between the 'West' and North Korea to at least World War II.

The following Summary is stolen from: www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/11/24/3075047.htm

"The latest round of Korean hostilities represents a continuation of a long-running conflict that has simmered since the start of the Cold War.

The withdrawal of Japanese forces at the end of World War II, after an occupation of 40 years, left the Korean peninsula divided into two zones occupied by allies-turned-adversaries - the United States and the Soviet Union.

The 38th parallel, originally an administrative border designated by US forces, increasingly became a political divide, with the establishment of a communist government in the north.

After several years of escalating skirmishes, in June 1950 North Korean forces launched an invasion, signalling the first open conflict of the Cold War.

With the aid of US and UN forces, including Australian soldiers, the South Koreans drove the Northern army back past the 38th parallel and almost to the Chinese border.

The intervention of Chinese forces and Soviet assistance saw Southern forces again pushed back beyond the 38th parallel, before the threat of nuclear escalation forced a stand-off.

The war would become a template for Cold War conflict, with the US and Soviet forces choosing sides in the internal struggles of countries and avoiding outright conflict between themselves.

While the armistice in 1953 established a demilitarised zone between the two Koreas, there has never been a formal peace treaty between them.

Relations on the peninsula have waxed and waned over the past 50 years, with the South pressing for a peaceful unification and the North skilfully playing its nuclear capabilities to prop up its failing economy.

With the end of the Cold War and the rise of China, the Korean peninsula has shifted to reflect the current dynamics in the North Asia region.

For China, a divided Korea represents a valuable buffer between its borders and US forces, who have a large presence in and around Seoul.

The withdrawal of US forces will be crucial in any reunification deal but would represent a major strategic shift in US policy in the region.

For Japan and South Korea, a strong US presence in the region remains vital in balancing the rising regional power of China.

This regional balancing act is hampered by the unpredictable nature of the North Korean regime, which, after years of famine and isolation, is adept at using the threat of war to wrangle aid and resources out of its regional adversaries."

Mobydisc
NSW, 9028 posts
29 Nov 2010 3:34PM
Thumbs Up

Elroy Jetson said...

"This regional balancing act is hampered by the unpredictable nature of the North Korean regime, which, after years of famine and isolation, is adept at using the threat of war to wrangle aid and resources out of its regional adversaries."


This is the key. Either South Korea and the US decide they won't be pushed around or they back down. If SK and the US don't back down then before you know it bullets start going back and forth and its on.

I disagree that war necessarily leads to innovation and economic growth. I used to think war did but now believe war just leads to waste and destruction. Some examples where peaceful application of technology have far outstripped military uses of technology abound.

The Internet is one. The net only took off once it was demilitarised and given to universities then the public. Motorised transportation is another. The best military in the world gives us the Hummer which is hardly the best vehicle in the world.

Whatever benefits war gives is far outweighed by the cost. The death, horrific injuries, economic ruin and buggered up lives that war creates is not worth the benefit of a fancy jet or a new weapons guidance system.

SandS
VIC, 5904 posts
29 Nov 2010 10:33PM
Thumbs Up


i would ring tim holding and offer him the job , with brumby as his faithfull side kick

they must need a water factory somewhere over there .

japie
NSW, 6832 posts
29 Nov 2010 10:52PM
Thumbs Up

I reckon that the United States badly needs another war. Their economy is in a death spiral. China, Russia and Brazil have announced that they will no longer be using the dollar in their transactions. Their unemployment rate is through the roof.

Problem is the administration will not get support for escalated theaters of action.

Unless the population can be turned around. They provoked Japan into attacking them in the second world war at Pearl Harbour and the voters did a U turn.

If they did not want war with NK the military exercises would have been called off. Question is, are the North Koreans gormless enough to sink a patsy and land themselves (and every other bastard ) in a conflict the world does not need?

Gordon Duff of Veterans Today has an interesting outlook: www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2010/11/25/gordon-duff-iran-korea-nuclear-lies-orders-from-tel-aviv/

stamp
QLD, 2770 posts
1 Dec 2010 7:45PM
Thumbs Up

nobody stands a chance against kim jong il while he has arec barlwin on his side

Danger Mouse
WA, 592 posts
2 Dec 2010 1:22PM
Thumbs Up

Call in Hans Bricks



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"What would you do if you governed South Korea?" started by FlySurfer