shark stats

You don't need to add foxes, the fox population fluctuates depending on food supply and predation. Adding an apex predator will solve the ecological balance. Apex predators are slow breeding, and stabilise ecosystems, in water and land..

My point was that from the planets perspective, one shark is more valuable than another bloody human, no matter what LLanes book says..

They killed all the sharks off the coast of America and Humbolt squids (ocean foxes?) replaced them, totally destroyed a balanced ecosystem (along with human over fishing)..

Healthy populations of sharks are priceless, humans are, frankly, expendable..

We'd be in trouble is sharks bit as much as I did hahah

That is taking my quote out of context. The quote was in relation to looking at things from 'perspective'. And from the planets perspective, humans are a dime a dosen..

Nothing changes when the population drops from 7 billion to 7 billion-1?

From my perspective I'm more important than many things. And I presume you are typing this on a personal computer, bought with money that could have been sent to some corner of the planet to save a Hungry Hungry Human?

So Hasta La Vista.. Starvin Marvin also?..

^^ I can't remember Cyberdyne Systems Model 101 saying Humans were expendable, so I missed the reference! lol.. But that was its overal opinion, maybe thats where I got it from..

I guess I also get my morals from Scripture

Anyway, I went to youtube to find a quote (dunno why I'm pretty sure I know every line).. But I found this instead!! Even better..

**Holy crap there is heaps of musicals. And it was Rambo that had all the 'expendable' lines

*clears throat hands out business card*

You rang?