Forums > Stand Up Paddle   Board Talk & Reviews

Hokua x32 le

Reply
Created by SupaTrooper > 9 months ago, 27 Nov 2013
SupaTrooper
QLD, 243 posts
27 Nov 2013 10:37PM
Thumbs Up

Has anyone got any info on what the x32 le is from naish?





DavidJohn
VIC, 17434 posts
28 Nov 2013 2:28AM
Thumbs Up

I've put an order in for a new LE big-boy Hokua..

So I should be able to say more and post pics of it next week..

DJ

Adoy
NSW, 238 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:15AM
Thumbs Up

Sounds good they needed a Hokua model for the big guys

DavidJohn
VIC, 17434 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:52AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Adoy said..

Sounds good they needed a Hokua model for the big guys


I agree.. btw.. There's four of them..

DJ

DavidJohn
VIC, 17434 posts
28 Nov 2013 10:27AM
Thumbs Up

More info here.. www.naishsurfing.com/hokua-x32-le-series-versatile-performance-wave-product-video/

I've ordered the 9'1''

DJ

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:33AM
Thumbs Up

5 inches thick & 9 kilos???

Windgenuity
NSW, 632 posts
Site Sponsor
28 Nov 2013 1:00PM
Thumbs Up


Windgenuity
NSW, 632 posts
Site Sponsor
28 Nov 2013 1:01PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Zeusman said..

5 inches thick & 9 kilos???


and 150 liters though.

skebstebamal
QLD, 579 posts
28 Nov 2013 4:17PM
Thumbs Up

finally something cool for the units of the world.

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:48PM
Thumbs Up

I was kinda hoping they'd keep in Hokua tradition & make them fairly thin. Would've thought that volume could still be in there but I am no expert. Also seem fairly heavy for the LE construction type. I've seen all the other LE Hokuas in the flesh & they're all super light!

BrisKites
QLD, 1286 posts
28 Nov 2013 10:06PM
Thumbs Up

The reason they decided on width was to keep the rails thin, apparently during testing they worked better than the 30" wide prototypes.
The additional weight is because they decided to make the base in a stronger sandwich laminate construction than the original Hokua LE boards, still very light though.

SaltH20
123 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:24PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
BrisKites said..

The reason they decided on width was to keep the rails thin, apparently during testing they worked better than the 30" wide prototypes.
The additional weight is because they decided to make the base in a stronger sandwich laminate construction than the original Hokua LE boards, still very light though.


Thanks for the info...so the question to be asked....Naish Hokua x32 or Starboard WP?

Anyone?

JohnnyMaya
196 posts
28 Nov 2013 9:37PM
Thumbs Up

It looks as the 7'10 would be like an upscaled version of the 7'6 Hokua.
I could almost bet it would be a nice small board for mushy fat waves for big boys (the 7'10 would serve boys up to 105kg easily)!

On the other hand, the boards are pretty heavy for carbon boards, even if you thing the bottoms have been reinforced.
Comparatively, the 9'1 model at 150l is half a kilo heavier than a Starboard 10'0 Noserider model - and that board is a monster boat!!!I think potencial buyers will have to have a good look on the price tag, specially when the JP Surf Wide Body models surf so good and are so light and cheap!

Cheers boys.

PS: Hey DJ, have you considered the 8'8" or the 8'3" models? They both have pretty decent volumes for a 95kg guy!

supthecreek
2593 posts
29 Nov 2013 2:41AM
Thumbs Up

I'm interested....pretty nice looking on paper. I need a winter board that handles the wetsuit, wind and general mayhem of winter conditions.
Looking for stability & performance, but I don't want to break a board.... so I guess added weight is the price you pay.

Probably way out of my price range... but I'd like to see one.

laceys lane
QLD, 19803 posts
29 Nov 2013 7:08AM
Thumbs Up

just how much money are we talking here of a sup surfboard!!!!!.


the starbies are so expansive.


carbon adds a bit to the price of a board , but no where near as much as brands are charging.


seems like you put the word carbon in there and its a licence to go to town

JB
NSW, 2232 posts
Site Sponsor
29 Nov 2013 8:54AM
Thumbs Up

Here's a link to the launch page, has the construction on there.

www.naishsurfing.com/hokua-x32-le-series-versatile-performance-wave-product-video/

Lacey, please note these are not just Carbon layup for the "tagging" purpose. Carbon is not always the best in every application. The Hokua LE uses a Carbon Kevlar deck and a Glass Matrix bottom, with the board having a full PVC sandwich. Weights are good for the volume of the board and the strength (approx. 1kg lighter than a similar volume Naish's GT construction (an excellent strength to weight ratio) ). It's important to understand that not all boards are created equal, so comparing between brands etc is extremely hard as not all brands use the same construction, types of carbon, kevlar, sandwich and so on. The 9'1" retails at $2349. down to $2099 for the 7'10".

Jase at Briskites is right, and I look forward to putting it into practice. Naish have always designed around performance, not just the trendy numbers on the market. Numerous R&D found the performance of lower profile rails and thinner tails far out weighs a narrower board with boxy rails, and to reach the volumes 32" was the perfect width.

One thing to point out, and take this with some sense ability, the rider weights Naish recommends is to help guide you, not to limit you. At 95kg, I can ride the 7'6", 8'3" and 8'10" in the Hokua LE range where "suggested" weights are as low as 79kg. however have ridden with lighter riders that struggle on these same boards. So don't religiously follow numbers, use them as a guide. As always - Demo is the key!!

Hanging to get on em.

Ride safe,

JB

laceys lane
QLD, 19803 posts
29 Nov 2013 8:10AM
Thumbs Up

JB said..

Here's a link to the launch page, has the construction on there.

www.naishsurfing.com/hokua-x32-le-series-versatile-performance-wave-product-video/

Lacey, please note these are not just Carbon layup for the "tagging" purpose. Carbon is not always the best in every application. The Hokua LE uses a Carbon Kevlar deck and a Glass Matrix bottom, with the board having a full PVC sandwich. Weights are good for the volume of the board and the strength (approx. 1kg lighter than a similar volume Naish's GT construction (an excellent strength to weight ratio) ). It's important to understand that not all boards are created equal, so comparing between brands etc is extremely hard as not all brands use the same construction, types of carbon, kevlar, sandwich and so on. The 9'1" retails at $2349. down to $2099 for the 7'10".

Jase at Briskites is right, and I look forward to putting it into practice. Naish have always designed around performance, not just the trendy numbers on the market. Numerous R&D found the performance of lower profile rails and thinner tails far out weighs a narrower board with boxy rails, and to reach the volumes 32" was the perfect width.

One thing to point out, and take this with some sense ability, the rider weights Naish recommends is to help guide you, not to limit you. At 95kg, I can ride the 7'6", 8'3" and 8'10" in the Hokua LE range where "suggested" weights are as low as 79kg. however have ridden with lighter riders that struggle on these same boards. So don't religiously follow numbers, use them as a guide. As always - Demo is the key!!

Hanging to get on em.

Ride safe,

JB



that's not as dear as i was imagining

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
29 Nov 2013 8:27AM
Thumbs Up

JB said..

Here's a link to the launch page, has the construction on there.

www.naishsurfing.com/hokua-x32-le-series-versatile-performance-wave-product-video/

Lacey, please note these are not just Carbon layup for the "tagging" purpose. Carbon is not always the best in every application. The Hokua LE uses a Carbon Kevlar deck and a Glass Matrix bottom, with the board having a full PVC sandwich. Weights are good for the volume of the board and the strength (approx. 1kg lighter than a similar volume Naish's GT construction (an excellent strength to weight ratio) ). It's important to understand that not all boards are created equal, so comparing between brands etc is extremely hard as not all brands use the same construction, types of carbon, kevlar, sandwich and so on. The 9'1" retails at $2349. down to $2099 for the 7'10".

Jase at Briskites is right, and I look forward to putting it into practice. Naish have always designed around performance, not just the trendy numbers on the market. Numerous R&D found the performance of lower profile rails and thinner tails far out weighs a narrower board with boxy rails, and to reach the volumes 32" was the perfect width.

One thing to point out, and take this with some sense ability, the rider weights Naish recommends is to help guide you, not to limit you. At 95kg, I can ride the 7'6", 8'3" and 8'10" in the Hokua LE range where "suggested" weights are as low as 79kg. however have ridden with lighter riders that struggle on these same boards. So don't religiously follow numbers, use them as a guide. As always - Demo is the key!!

Hanging to get on em.

Ride safe,

JB


Fair enough JB.

I certainly do look forward to trying them.

Markyb
NSW, 41 posts
29 Nov 2013 7:42PM
Thumbs Up





Markyb
NSW, 41 posts
29 Nov 2013 7:50PM
Thumbs Up













Rossall
WA, 695 posts
29 Nov 2013 5:01PM
Thumbs Up

Any pics on the nose rocker

seabreezer
377 posts
30 Nov 2013 8:05AM
Thumbs Up

yep - would be great to see a profile shot - to see where theyve added all that chunk - if in the middle and a nice thin depth tail / thin rails , i would consider these

Markyb
NSW, 41 posts
30 Nov 2013 11:11AM
Thumbs Up





seabreezer
377 posts
30 Nov 2013 8:25AM
Thumbs Up

cheers4that - unreal speedy service ! that looks super nice - just about skinny enough right on the tail pad - lots of chunk logo area and just in front of the N - would have alot of that last few seconds stability catching a wave (although quite a bit of rocker there) ... rocker looks alot - ?? say more than 8'5's & 9's

SaltH20
123 posts
30 Nov 2013 8:27AM
Thumbs Up

Anyone???

I'd like to know how these stack up against the Starboard WP's.

Very curious about the 8'3 LE vs. 8'2 WP.

Anyone had a go on these?

Homeally
VIC, 409 posts
30 Nov 2013 11:37PM
Thumbs Up


Naish 8'8 and 9'1 Hokua X32 Review:

Rider: 117kg

Location: Palm Beach, NSW
Wave size/conditions: 2foot slop???. Slight onshore winds ??? steep take off into a shoulder high wall, into a deep trough fattening the wave into a shallow shorie???

Overall:
Incredibly loose boards all round. Surfing more off the front foot, slightly touching the back to engage rail in a turn. Never felt anything like it. No doubt a big mans performance/competition short board. Advanced riders only.

8???8:
As soon as I took pressure of the front foot and transitioned to the back, the rail engaged and threw the tail out. Bucket potential: EXTREME!! Board held it???s speed through fat sections whilst maintaining maneuverability.

While it felt alittle sketchy to begin with, adapting to the glide and directional stability of the board, I still managed to catch waves where I normally would, and negotiating late take-offs with ease. Paddling onto a wave was similar to the JP 8'8 Widebody.

9???1:
NO DIFFERENCE ???PADDABILITY??? BETWEEN 8???8 AND 9???1!!!!

Stability wise, the 9???1 felt more comfortable whilst out the back. The board performed similar to the 8???8. Again, incredibly loose for a board it???s size, especially at 151L.

To choose between the 8???8 or 9???1 personally is a hard decision. From a comfort level, the 9???1 is the obvious choice, however as a step up, which is what the these boards are and what I actually need, I will get more out the 8???8 in the long run???

Now, the $2399 question: How do they compare to other boards of similar volume???

The Hokua X32 LE are definitely unlike anything I???ve surfed. In saying that, they are for advanced riders, essentially a Hokua for those who aren???t Kai Lenny or Beau Nixon.

In comparison to the Fanatic All-Wave (9???1), these boards are a step up, hands down. In the conditions that were surfed this morning, the All-Wave wouldn???t have made the transition through the fat sections without paddle assistance. However I wouldn???t have surfed the All-Wave in what was offered. Usual board of choice would be the 10???6 Nalu. I use the All-Wave in 4-8ft beachies. My other board of choice is the Fanatic 9???3 Pro-Wave, again this board is only used in decent surf, ie. 6-8ft reefs with fast walls.

So where do the Hokua x32 LE fit in? These guys are definitely small wave shredders for sure, but I do want to get them into some size to get an accurate and opinion. New boards are always strange at first, however as I get used to it, I should get a better understanding of how it performs. Potentially, the 8???8 is a new comp board given it???s performance this morning, taking the place of the 10???6 Nalu. THIS IS A BIG CALL!! The board was almost too loose for my liking, however it was set with stock fins. In the morning, I???ll surf it with quads which should stiffen them up, allowing a better understanding of how the rails and tail engages.

Whether they are the board for you only you will know depending on what you want to get out of it. You could end up preferring a Fanatic All-Wave or Starboard Widepoint for the particular essences you want.

All in all, sick boards no doubt!! Probably will be making an addition to the garage.

As allways, DEMO, DEMO, DEMO!

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
3 Dec 2013 4:07PM
Thumbs Up

Had my first surf on the 9'1" this morning. Set up with Shapers Quad fins. Head high surf with a strong NE blowing across & up the wave faces making it very difficult to get it. The few waves I did get felt pretty good Like JB & Matty have previously stated, very loose board! Different feel to anything I've previously ridden. Can't say much yet but will post again once I've had a decent session.

DavidJohn
VIC, 17434 posts
3 Dec 2013 6:01PM
Thumbs Up

I paddled my 9'1" at St Kilda today to check for stability.. I give it two thumbs up..

DJ

GizzieNZ
4102 posts
3 Dec 2013 3:04PM
Thumbs Up

Go Zeusman....right up with the play........a board for every day
or so it seems to the casual observer :)

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
3 Dec 2013 6:23PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
GizzieNZ said...
Go Zeusman....right up with the play........a board for every day
or so it seems to the casual observer :)


Haha...! Well of course Gizzie. & why wouldn't you?!

Zeusman
QLD, 1363 posts
5 Dec 2013 10:35AM
Thumbs Up

Second surf- Pretty much identical conditions. Managed to chase down a few bombs this time taking off behind the peak, had to pump it to race ahead & make the section. Board gained & carried speed very well. Had a couple of big lip hits & floaters too. All very easy & predictable. Did lose the tail on a couple of bottom turns but was able to slip the foot back a touch & hang on. Having fun so far.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Stand Up Paddle   Board Talk & Reviews


"Hokua x32 le" started by SupaTrooper