Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
  Surf Cameras
  Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
General
Gps & Speed Sailing
Wave Sailing
Foiling
Gear Reviews
Lost & Found
Windsurfing WA
Windsurfing NSW
Windsurfing QLD
Windsurfing Victoria
Windsurfing SA
Windsurfing Tasmania
General
Gear Reviews
Foiling
Newbies / Tips & Tricks
Lost & Found
Western Australia
New South Wales
Queensland
Victoria
South Australia
Tasmania
General
Foiling
Board Talk & Reviews
Wing Foiling
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
  Active Topics
  Subscribed Topics
  Rules & Guidelines
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)
  Search for a Location
  Clear Recents
Metro
South West
Central West
North West
Surf Cameras
Safety Bay Camera
Metro
North
Mid North
Illawarra
South Coast
Metro
West Coast
East Coast
Brisbane
Far North
Central Coast
Sunshine Coast
Gold Coast
Hobart
West Coast
North Coast
East Coast
Recent
Western Australia
New South Wales
Victoria
South Australia
Queensland
Northern Territory
Tasmania
  My Favourites
  Reverse Arrows
All
Windsurfing
Kitesurfing
Surfing
Longboarding
Stand Up Paddle
Wing Foiling
Sailing
Active Topics
Subscribed Topics
Forum Rules
Login
Lost My Details!
Join! (Its Free)

Forums > Stand Up Paddle General

design qualities in shorter sups

Reply
Created by couscous > 9 months ago, 21 Jan 2010
couscous
24 posts
21 Jan 2010 2:13PM
Thumbs Up

Hello Breezers
A comment made in another post by CMC about a surfers back to front foot weight ratio being as unique as a footprint, got me thinking, i am no specialist in board design and i am wondering what others think are important qualities in a shorter style sup board for a back foot heavy surfer one that makes sense to me would be a further aft wide point. but what about fin placement, section thickness, nose surface area and tail type?

CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
21 Jan 2010 4:28PM
Thumbs Up

That's why you should get Greg, Rod or Muzza on SUP in the surf. For my money these guys know more about gravity (not sail) propelled wave riding rockers and hydrodynamics than any of the bigger production labels available.

I reckon it's not that much different to a shortboard as we progress led by the likes of yourself into the future. Same rail shapes, hard edges and rockers just scaled up and with enough volume to stand on to paddle. Once you're on the wave it just feels like surfing to me with really long arms to drag that big sucker around on rail.......

goatman
NSW, 2151 posts
21 Jan 2010 5:37PM
Thumbs Up

Something like this for a heavy back footer:

8'9" x 28 " x 4 1/4" (I'm 83kg)

It's got generous Rocker - heaps of Concave and low profile rails. Swallow tail and plenty of nose area.







billboard
QLD, 2817 posts
21 Jan 2010 4:51PM
Thumbs Up

It would be worth your while contacting Tully at Noosa surf works and picking his brains about anything performance sup related. These guys are at the forefront of stand up paddle design/production and surfing in Australia at the moment and their boards and surfing speak volumes about the amount of knowledge and skill that go into every single board that they make.

CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
21 Jan 2010 4:54PM
Thumbs Up

goatman said...

Something like this for a heavy back footer:

8'9" x 28 " x 4 1/4" (I'm 83kg)

It's got generous Rocker - heaps of Concave and low profile rails. Swallow tail and plenty of nose area.











Here's an experiment for you:

That Laguna board is 8'9 x 28 x 4 1/4.

Scaled down (divided by 1.41). You are riding a 6'2 x 19 3/4" x 3" Not too far off what you would ride as a shortboard at 85kg barr the thickness of which is blown out as you are not lying down to paddle.

My point: There is not much new to learn here, you want performance boards for the surf? you get a performance shortboard outline and scale it up. Bang. The amount you can scale up is reliant upon your balance, strength and experience. Do the maths with your board.....

There is room to reduce length further by exploring new ways to maintain volume without having to go too wide as (just as shortboards) if you go wide with too much rail outline you lack projection from turns, it's loose but you go nowhere.

I think about this stuff way too much.

goatman
NSW, 2151 posts
21 Jan 2010 6:10PM
Thumbs Up

I agree with some of that - however SUPs have their own perculiar design challenges - as you mentioned the volume v width thing.

I don't think that a conventional pulled in nose, shortboard outline is necessarily the best one for a SUP however.

I think there is PLENTY yet to learn about high performance SUP design.

hilly
WA, 7491 posts
21 Jan 2010 4:58PM
Thumbs Up

The JL Mano range have little volume up front which is great in small surf but my PSH board has a wide point further forward and feels better in larger waves.

It will always be a compromise.

The shapers are on the right track though.

Love your work at dy goatie :-) not long now and you will be over here.

Th0m0
QLD, 529 posts
21 Jan 2010 8:29PM
Thumbs Up

Very interesting thread. Don't get to read to much on sup design as it is all so new.

It looks like you've got a thruster setup on the Laguna Goaty. How do you find that compared to the 2+1 the majority of sups run?

CMC are you still running H2's in your sup? Whats your take on fins for sups?

Anybody else with input on the thuster V 2+1 setup, I'd like to hear it.

laceys lane
QLD, 19803 posts
21 Jan 2010 9:24PM
Thumbs Up

Th0m0 said...

Very interesting thread. Don't get to read to much on sup design as it is all so new.

It looks like you've got a thruster setup on the Laguna Goaty. How do you find that compared to the 2+1 the majority of sups run?

CMC are you still running H2's in your sup? Whats your take on fins for sups?

Anybody else with input on the thuster V 2+1 setup, I'd like to hear it.


i've got a board on the program that has the widest part of the board behind centre with a almost a no nose. the idea is you will stand back farther, be in a closer surfing position,if you are standing farther back hopefully you don't need as much nose area for stability, less nose area equals faster turning. could be a dog when i decide to get it made , but what if---------

Bnaccas
VIC, 1722 posts
22 Jan 2010 12:00AM
Thumbs Up

I've heard the only rule to shaping was the wide point needed to be forward of centre.
Everything else varies depending on the riders needs. You should build it Lacey, would be great to see how it goes.

My first board, the 8'3" is so much fun but mainly in smaller waves 3ft and under. I find it a bit skatey and hard to bury the rail when it gets bigger. It nose rides great, catches waves easy and turns on a dime and I have learnt a lot from it.

I've almost finished my new board. 8'7" x 28 1/4" x 4". I have gone for more of a no nose shape for better spin weight and less catching rails when coming off the top, less volume and thinner rails behind centre so I can dig the rail in more. I also put less concave in the nose. I guess we'll see how it goes in the next few days.

FINS...I have only ridden a thruster once and liked it but am not game enough to put it into my board. I'm going to have to try it though with an FCS converter. What thruster fins are people using? I'm assuming something a little bigger than normal?


Scotty Mac
SA, 2055 posts
21 Jan 2010 11:35PM
Thumbs Up

SUP like a wizards sleeve.......Well as I found out after I shaped it!

The missing link between;
narrow and round
short and stable
stability and drive
short board and mal







Well I hope so, I havent ridden it yet!

Scotty Mac
SA, 2055 posts
21 Jan 2010 11:41PM
Thumbs Up

Brendan,
QUADS.
I use SF4 performance core or on a fish style board, Simon Anderson large fronts with simon anderson medium rears.

Bnaccas
VIC, 1722 posts
22 Jan 2010 12:53AM
Thumbs Up

Scotty Mac said...

Brendan,
QUADS.
I use SF4 performance core or on a fish style board, Simon Anderson large fronts with simon anderson medium rears.


Yeah I've thought about quads but again haven't made enough boards yet to have tried it. I liked the feel of the original 9'6" Naish quad. It was a really good board back then.

Funny you say "Wizards Sleeve". This is exactly what I was thinking when I shaped my first board and still was at the front of my mind for this board, although the nose is pointy it still carries some width to the tip.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Stand Up Paddle General


"design qualities in shorter sups" started by couscous