How short can a board be before it no longer performs for the average surfer that weighs in around 90kg.Currently I ride a 5'10" Waverocket and love it. I have just had the oppurtunity of riding a 5'6"x22" Rake Mini Simmons and was surprised by its performance,very easy too surf and paddle.Would like too get another board and was wandering how small it could be.
Wow thats one shiney looking board. Looks to good to wax. It reminds me of a disc. Im not sure how small is to small guess you have to keep going smaller to find out.
Im 6ft and have trouble surfing anything under 6ft, I find it hard to paddle into waves on anything too small
Under 6 foot for me.....anything under that I find to hard to paddle at 110kgs and to wide to keep the required volume
Two words - Board Porn , looks like it has an S deck to it as well what's the width
At 6'10" and 108kg the shortest board I ride is a 6'6" Fish.
In the end of the day it's about what works for you really
Really liking the looks of these boards.Found a few more and a way of making them shorter is by having a shovel nose.Makes me wonder why modern surf boards have to have that eye peircing sharp nose?
just saw this board on the website and its mine. adrian at rake organized this custom for me , shaped by jordan, i'm about 90kgs and the board floats and paddles really well, i have a few simmons boards and this one is one of my favorites, a bit more weight than the EPS/epoxy versions but the weight is actually a benefit when the offshores exceed 15knts. jordan has the bottom shape nailed and it flies.....
s-decks were originally done on the true simmons boards from bob simmons, he did this to reduce the swing weight of those bigger heavier boards to make them easier to turn and to steady it quicker aftera turn as these boards were quite heavy , the mini simmons boards are so short that an s-deck is basically doing nothing other than a having visual appeal and ifollowing bob simmons's design but in a shorter version.
That board looks sick.
How short is too short? I haven't found it yet and I surf a 5'4"!
I think it all comes down to paddle power. Length helps you paddle in, which is why fat old dudes ride mals. For someone who's decently fit and not a kook, then I reckon around 5 and a half feet is about the limit.
Although, I've yet to try a 4' board, so who knows...
yeah my black rake is 5'6" . i was once told that if you go too short , you lose the whole planing feel . i've got 3 simmons boards , 2 5'6"' boards and a 5'8" .
went for a surf today on the black rake and a chick came up to me in the carpark and said" whats that ? is that a kneeboard? i said no " i cut the bottom of my bath out and painted it black.
he he
younger crew havent got a clue yet ....i spose its only a matter of time...will prob see some 4'10" boards kickin around then...
he he he, i recall lending an xxxxlarge wetty to someone and it fit them like a glove....pics coming
I'm a featherweight @ 65kg. But mates weighing 80-90kg have surfed it with no problems.
For me, 20" is about the widest I reckon a shortboard should be. How do you turn a board that's wider than 20"? You'd have to step across the board to turn it... unless you have feet the size of Shaq...
i'd agree with about the width theory but because the boards are so short they're still pretty easy to turn up to 22.5 -23 in width, but personally 22 seems to be the magic number......because they plane so insanely fast all you need to do is fart and the board whips around....thats why EB looks like he going through gates on a slalom course when he's on the simmons.
BTW you cant use shortboard theories with the simmons....totally different way of surfing....totally different board both in concept and approach