Rope type for Jordan series drogue

So I've sown up my 100 cones for my drogue on the trusty sewing machine, now to select what type of rope to attach them too.

Jordan recommends for a 10,000lb displacement yacht bridles coming from each side of the stern that are 2.5 x's the transom width, then 80 foot of line then a further 170 foot of line that the cones are attached to. For this displacement he recommends 5/8" double braided nylon with 25lb chain or anchor on the end (some advise 15lb).

Packed up this is 290 feet odd of nylon line which is a big heavy package for a small boat, especially if wet. Jordan invented this system before dyneema was invented. Using dyneema would mean that the bundle of line would be a lot smaller, lighter and far more convenient. Also it doesn't absorb water to the same extent as nylon rope.

Obviously dyneema hasn't got the stretch of nylon rope, so the question is would using dyneema reduce the effectiveness of the drogue? My reasoning is probably not, because it is the delayed engagement of the cones with the sea along the length of the line that provides this type of drogue it's effectiveness rather than the elasticity of the nylon.

To reduce shock being transmitted to the hull attachment points, my original thought was to use nylon line for the two bridles, and use dyneema for the rest of the line. That is until I found an obscure entry buried in an old Cruisersforum post on this topic. The author indicated he had asked Jordan some time ago about using a less elastic form of rope and Jordan's answer was quite definitive. He advised that less elasticity is better, because the cones close to the boat must pick up the load quickly before the boat broaches, so less stretch the better. Counter intuitive but it makes sense!

So there it is. The entire drogue will be in 8mm dyneema, including the bridles.