Help. I was good, really good, 27 years ago but never used it and now I can't even see enough information to figure out how to do it.
I want my mummy.
I am a cheat Ted, through and through.
But I couldn't even work out how to cheat on that one.
ET.
"Colleens belly was shaking like jelly ,and i was harder than Chinese algebra"
Tom Waits
need i say more
Select to expand quote
Ted the Kiwi said..
No cheating........
how is my answer ted
Select to expand quotePrawnhead said..
"Colleens belly was shaking like jelly ,and i was harder than Chinese algebra"
Tom Waits
need i say more
Someone else may be more technically correct, but i think Prawnhead should get the chocolates.
Teddy mate I am excellent with Bra's I can whip 'em off the chickybabes in the twinkling of an eye ..... especially the little lacy numbers that have no bastard clip 
Well done Chrsipy. You are a scholar 
Pup - no doubt you are a legend at the clip behind the back but have you ever felt like a fool when the clip is in the middle on the front I recall the first time I came across that one
Select to expand quotechrispy said...
Ted the Kiwi said..
No cheating........
how is my answer ted
That's not algebra though. I was looking for a method of reducing the known and unknowns into equations.
Select to expand quotethedrip said...
That's not algebra though. I was looking for a method of reducing the known and unknowns into equations.
simultaneous equations and the substitution rule = algebra you are on the right track !
It's similar to some of the discussions that go on in the greenroom. Does this wave = this wave if I use this board n this style or should I use that board
