Testing is showing some phones have better speed resolution than others when used with GPSLogit.
Please add details of your phones tested resolution so we can get an idea of the phones best suited for gps speedsailing purposes.
Best
0.02 knots resolution
Alcatel Onetouch
Samsung Galaxy J1
Worst
0.486 knots resloution
Sony Xperia
Motorola Moto X
Boombuster GT-31 35.475 33.592 17.842 21.876 28.154 60.379
Logit app Moto-G 35.232 33.687 17.777 21.636 28.18 60.035
Used the Logit app yest but it recorded nothing turned it on before and switched off when I came in but it read nothing.
Boombuster GT-31 35.475 33.592 17.842 21.876 28.154 60.379
Logit app Moto-G 35.232 33.687 17.777 21.636 28.18 60.035
Used the Logit app yest but it recorded nothing turned it on before and switched off when I came in but it read nothing.
Glynn this isn't what Roo asked for, your stuff would be better in the main logit thread.
Galaxy Ace 3 (GT-S727ST) .486kts
Just tested Gavin's LG, he's getting back to me with model number, but it's not recent because it had v4.1.2 in it, he's had to upgraded it so logit loads.
It's resolution is .019kts
I'm testing this in real speed, by clicking on the doppler speed column header. This sorts the column by speed, then it's just a matter of scrolling through the column to find the minimum difference between speeds.
Best
[b]0.02 knots resolution
Alcatel Onetouch [/b](4037T)[b]
Samsung Galaxy J1
Worst
0.486 knots resloution
Sony Xperia Motorola Moto X
Galaxy Ace 3[/b] (GT-S727ST)
I confirm my Sony Xperia also has Doppler resolution of 0.486 kts.
Interestingly, the trackpoint data resolution comes up as 0.005 to 0,006! But there is no way it is that accurate.
Best
[b]0.02 knots resolution
Alcatel Onetouch [/b](4037T)[b]
Samsung Galaxy J1
LG L7 2
Worst
0.486 knots resloution
Sony Xperia Motorola Moto X
Galaxy Ace 3[/b] (GT-S727ST)
Gavin says the LG was in his lap while taking it for a drive in his car, so not a good sky view at all.
Number of sats varies from 0 to 10 but most of the time there's 8 and the tracks look good, so this could be a possibility.
Most phones use assisted GPS. This was put together when the yanks needed better 911 emergency location and uses mobile phone towers to assist in triangulation.
the joy of android means that you have way too many hardware platforms. Some will only have assisted GPS and will require an internet connection and number of phone towers to anywhere near remotely accurate. Some are even reliant on google wi-fi positioning system.
neither of these systems work well outside metro areas and are dependant on your phone carriers ability to supply accurate aGPS information.
so, in a nut shell, if it does not have a autonomous GPS capability (functions without a data connection), it's next to useless.
put the phone in airplane mode, then run your tests again and check the accuracy.
I am testing the Sony Xperia without any phone connection. I have not even installed the sim card. It definitely contains a GPS.
Manfred's program also specifically accesses the Doppler speed data from the phones GPS.
If you know of any phones that don't actually contain a GPS chip, please list them for us.
There are 1000's of Android handsets on the market (At the end of 2014, about 18,796 different types apparently).
there are no standards manufacturers adhere to. As long as it runs the "Android execution environment" then you can flog it as an Android device.
So the 18,000 odd types of devices will run a multitude of hardware permutations, such as CPU and GPS chips. Some will be of far greater quality than others.
if your trying to define a standard, you would be better of choosing a model of phone that everyone has to use, otherwise there are far too many permutations. That's why the GT-11/31 etc. are a great leveler as everyone uses the same device.
It's obviously going to be too hard to test all the posibilities and OK some and black list others. But I think it's a worthwhile project to list the ones that are tested, at least their max resolution.
This was never going to be completely level playing field anyway, and for a great number of GTCers, there's not going to be any world shaking numbers.
The phone is such a great device, I think the better ones should be allowed for posting purposes, even the Xperia's numbers have come up very close to my GW52 so far.
It's probably best if the top end of the game posts with devices that log the sdop numbers.
I think the easiest way to confirm a device suitability is to ensure all testing is a level playing field.
airplane mode on (or no SIM sailquik)
decide a tolerance level
analyse and your done.
that will confirm if the GPS in the device is accurate enough.
I fully agree the rules should be different at the top end of town. It's great that GPSTC is still inclusive and being able to use your phone is one less financial barrier to having a go.
Best
[b]0.02 knots resolution
[/b]Samsung Galaxy S5
Samsung Galaxy S3
Samsung Galaxy SIII mini
Samsung Galaxy J1
Sony Xperia Z3
Alcatel One Touch Evolve 2
Worst
[b]0.486 knots resloution
Huawei Ascend Y330
Sony Xperia Z1 compact
Sony Xperia E1
Motorola Moto X
Motorola Moto E
Galaxy Ace 3[/b] (GT-S727ST)
There are 1000's of Android handsets on the market (At the end of 2014, about 18,796 different types apparently).
there are no standards manufacturers adhere to. As long as it runs the "Android execution environment" then you can flog it as an Android device.
So the 18,000 odd types of devices will run a multitude of hardware permutations, such as CPU and GPS chips. Some will be of far greater quality than others.
if your trying to define a standard, you would be better of choosing a model of phone that everyone has to use, otherwise there are far too many permutations. That's why the GT-11/31 etc. are a great leveler as everyone uses the same device.
Be that as it may, please, if you know of any phones that don't actually contain a GPS chip, please list them for us.
I received this data from Manfred on phones he has tested:
All are listed already by Roo but with some more detail.
Huawei Ascend Y330 is listed from Manfred as having a resolution of 0.019 kn, while Roo lists it as 0.486 kn Resolution.
Which list is correct?
Hannes
Huawei Ascend Y330 is listed from Manfred as having a resolution of 0.019 kn, while Roo lists it as 0.486 kn Resolution.
Which list is correct?
Hannes
Manfred is correct I just mistyped.
Here's the correct list.
Best
[b]0.019 knots resolution
[/b]Samsung Galaxy S5
Samsung Galaxy S3
Samsung Galaxy SIII mini
Samsung Galaxy J1
Sony Xperia Z3
Alcatel One Touch Evolve 2
[b]Huawei Ascend Y330 [/b]
Worst
[b]0.486 knots resloution
Sony Xperia Z1 compact
Sony Xperia E1
Motorola Moto X
Motorola Moto E
Galaxy Ace 3[/b] (GT-S727ST)
>
I went through the fist two pages and clicked on all the ones under $100. I didn't find any yet without a GPS......
Thats not to say there are not any. I just have not found them yet.
I see what I did now. Most of the cheaper ones (under $70) also don't have a 480X800 screen resolution. If you select 480X800 and 854x480 resolution it comes up with 3 phones that don't have a GPS
Mpie H8508 5.0 inch Android 4.4 Phablet MR6588 1.2GHz
FREE shipping $56.16
G900W Unlocked Phone Touch Screen WiFi MP3 TV Buletooth Dual Cameras
FREE shipping $49.84
BQ S37 3G Smartphone
Android 4.4 3.5 inch MTK6572 Dual Core 1.3GHz FM W...
FREE shipping $54.93
So there's three for your list.
I am testing the Sony Xperia without any phone connection. I have not even installed the sim card. It definitely contains a GPS.
Manfred's program also specifically accesses the Doppler speed data from the phones GPS.
If you know of any phones that don't actually contain a GPS chip, please list them for us.
Andrew, I also have not inserted a sim but my Xperia says I can make emergency calls. I have looked at the battery usage and most was for radio frequency so it
seems the sim only allows for you to be identified and billed etc. whilst the phone always remains connected to (or pings) the cell towers. You sometimes read of people writing that you can be tracked even with your phone powered off so I guess this is what they are referring to.
If you type in *#*#4636#*#* you can get the phone info on the Xperia. I turned off the radio and my battery life appears to be longer. I guess if I get stuck out in the middle of nowhere and need to make an emergency call I can just turn it back on.
OK. Thanks Mike. I guess those are not sold normally in Australia. Good to know one must look out for cheap Android phones which don't have the required GPS in them though.
Thanks Yo Yo. Thats a good code to have. Had a bit of a fiddle......
you have to be really careful when ordering a phone on gearbest, for the life of me I was sure the one I'd chosen had a gps....
arrived her, didn't have one.... (doesn't really matter I gave it to my mum and it was 60$)
same thing for language, was pretty sure I'd seen french but no french in the menu.
But awesome site, I've been ordering sh!tloads of stuff and it arrives well packaged and freight free.
Which earphones did you get Decrepit ? I got mine from them last week, tried them today, awesome !! (not much bass though)
>>>
But awesome site, I've been ordering sh!tloads of stuff and it arrives well packaged and freight free.
Which earphones did you get Decrepit ? I got mine from them last week, tried them today, awesome !! (not much bass though)
Well that's great to know, the site appears to be professional, but you always have your doubts.
This is what I've ordered.
Morul U5 Plus Waterproof IPX7 Earphone Handsfree Wireless Bluetooth Version 4.1 Sports Headset with NFC Connection Mic Stereo Earphone
I hope their IPX7 is good enough! And the phones aren't too big to fit inside my Gath.
I'll report back on them when I've used them.
same I got, clear sound, do tend to pop out of the ear ( I didn't use the ear clips provided, will next time).
you still hear the wind but as a background noise.
I haven't received my phone yet ( http://www.gearbest.com/cell-phones/pp_62902.html) so I just listened to music for an hour whilst sailing, like I said before a bit more bass would be better.
waterproof : didn't fall so can't really tell, but gave them a rinse and they still work.
funny thing is the instructions tell you you'll hear prompts in English but they are in Chinese so at first you have no clue if it's saying power on or off.... you're better off checking the every small led light!
Love the magnet function, very nice packaging too ! and different size ear plugs
all my mates at the beach want some now, starting a business
You phone now says it's out of stock, and the other colours are more expensive, so hope you got the last yellow one!
When you get it, an evaluation of it's resolution would great, also if you can figure out how, it's sensitivity.
same I got, clear sound, do tend to pop out of the ear ( I didn't use the ear clips provided, will next time).
tried them at home with the funny inside ear hooks, can't really see them making a difference, will check on the water :-)
You phone now says it's out of stock, and the other colours are more expensive, so hope you got the last yellow one!
That's marketing at it's at worst, I bought it at 72 $ (not 55 as shown) I guess when they run out of a colour they advertise it cheaper to lure you in....
I received this data from Manfred on phones he has tested:
All are listed already by Roo but with some more detail.
Looking for ways to measure the sensitivity of the phones I discovered there is a strong correlation with the number of sats in view.
The Alcatel One Touch Evolve 2 shows 10 or more sats on a consistant basis. The speed resolution is 0.019 knots. The average difference between doppler and track point results for the 5 X 10s is 0.65% (Trackpoint higher).
The Motorola Moto X drops below 10 sats on a regular basis. The D-TP difference is also higher.