Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight 
Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.
The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.
Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?
www.quora.com/Wouldnt-the-Suez-Canal-be-proof-of-a-flat-Earth-At-slightly-over-120-miles-long-the-amount-of-curvature-would-be-9-600-feet-Why-dont-we-see-it
Plenty of answers here. Below is the shortest, most obvious.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?
Of course it's perfectly horizontal idiot, other wise the water would all run up one end, wouldn't it???????
But it also follows the earths curvature, other wise it would be going up hill at the ends.
You still don't get curved level do you?
Just get it into your head.
HORIZONTAL doesn't = STRAIGHT.
They are two different things altogether.
Straight is a line connecting the shortest distance between two points.
Horizontal is a line at right angles to the line to the centre of gravity. And this line is curved!
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago
Select to expand quotejapie said..
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago
Lol!.... 
but you are wrong. That's an ice wall you are seeing there. Its so obvious a child can see it. It makes sense really as with a flat earth you would see a few smaller mountains but then the ice wall would dominate.
Select to expand quotesls said..petermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight
Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.
The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.
Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?
www.quora.com/Wouldnt-the-Suez-Canal-be-proof-of-a-flat-Earth-At-slightly-over-120-miles-long-the-amount-of-curvature-would-be-9-600-feet-Why-dont-we-see-it
Plenty of answers here. Below is the shortest, most obvious.
Obviously not shot through a telescope. Derr!
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..japie said..
I can see that the first structure is the top of a ship but I reckon that the stuff in the background is Chicago
Lol!....
but you are wrong. That's an ice wall you are seeing there. Its so obvious a child can see it. It makes sense really as with a flat earth you would see a few smaller mountains but then the ice wall would dominate.
So not flat but wavey. So THAT'S why there is always a horizon.
The P900 will bring everything back into view.
PS: It actually sees into the future as well
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
Put a string from one end of the Suez Canal to the other end and pull tight
Now if it were a ball as Japie is so convinced there'd be a huge elevation of land in the middle.
The middle of the string would be a kilometre or so underwater.
Also,is the bottom of the trench / canal built to take into account the claimed curvature? Or,is it built perfectly horizontal as seems almost certain?
Ok ill bite
Omfg !!!!!!!
you flat earthers really are simpletons.
A surveyor could explain to you but i dont think you are able to comprehend. 
Select to expand quoteRupert said..
I thought they stopped after they thought nothing could top 911 commission report... maybe they just wanted a change.
Select to expand quoteDelFuego said..
Ok ill bite
Omfg !!!!!!!
you flat earthers really are simpletons.
A surveyor could explain to you but i dont think you are able to comprehend.
That's the way people feel about some other stories.
