Forums > Kitesurfing General

Shark kill zones used to protect beaches

Reply
Created by burnsy11 > 9 months ago, 10 Dec 2013
Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 12:09PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
burnsy11 said...
Haydn24 said..

1QAZ2WSX said...
Ok using your caveman logics, let's go kill every bee near humans, remove every vending machine, stop people driving motor vehicles, ban skydiving and kill every hippo near humans!! Yes that's right, these kill more people than sharks! Disgraceful decision, we're doomed as a race, not long till Mother Nature sorts us out with some of her finest forces

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This argument regularly comes up and grinds my gears.

182 car fatalities in WA in 2012.
WA population is 2.1 million and say a million drive an average of an hour a day
In a year this is 365,000,000 hours on the road a year
1 death per 2,000,000 driving hours


Shark attacks 6 in two years
Say a thousand surfers surf for one hour a day
365,000 hours a year
1 death per 121,000 hours from sharks

Means your 16 times more likely to get eaten by a shark if you're a surfer than die driving your car.

Don???t get me started thinking about vending machine and bee exposure.


It's not about CHANCE of being killed but rather amount of people killed! I would bet you everything I own that number shark attacks will remain the same after this culling starts! Mark my words. They are not going to patrol every beach 24/7 are they?


Ill take that bet mate - just have a look at the statistics on the east coast you muppett - Fisherman will be taking out large numbers for the first couple months - as soon as a shark larger than 3m is spotted in the killzone - it will be killed !

The 18 yr old that died 11 days ago at Coffs Harbour??

Do you really think fisherman will be at every beach people surf at 24/7 to kill sharks? How many sharks chase bait into a beach then harmlessly swim back out to sea? Probably hundreds every day. Do they deserve to die because you want to feel safer in an already statistically safe environment? My answer is no.

Do you wear copious amounts of sunscreen when you go outdoors? Probably not but your chance of dying of cancer is so much higher than getting chomped by a shark, "muppet".

burnsy11
WA, 122 posts
11 Dec 2013 10:28AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Haydn24 said..

burnsy11 said...
Haydn24 said..

1QAZ2WSX said...
Ok using your caveman logics, let's go kill every bee near humans, remove every vending machine, stop people driving motor vehicles, ban skydiving and kill every hippo near humans!! Yes that's right, these kill more people than sharks! Disgraceful decision, we're doomed as a race, not long till Mother Nature sorts us out with some of her finest forces

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This argument regularly comes up and grinds my gears.

182 car fatalities in WA in 2012.
WA population is 2.1 million and say a million drive an average of an hour a day
In a year this is 365,000,000 hours on the road a year
1 death per 2,000,000 driving hours


Shark attacks 6 in two years
Say a thousand surfers surf for one hour a day
365,000 hours a year
1 death per 121,000 hours from sharks

Means your 16 times more likely to get eaten by a shark if you're a surfer than die driving your car.

Don???t get me started thinking about vending machine and bee exposure.


It's not about CHANCE of being killed but rather amount of people killed! I would bet you everything I own that number shark attacks will remain the same after this culling starts! Mark my words. They are not going to patrol every beach 24/7 are they?


Ill take that bet mate - just have a look at the statistics on the east coast you muppett - Fisherman will be taking out large numbers for the first couple months - as soon as a shark larger than 3m is spotted in the killzone - it will be killed !

The 18 yr old that died 11 days ago at Coffs Harbour??

Do you really think fisherman will be at every beach people surf at 24/7 to kill sharks? How many sharks chase bait into a beach then harmlessly swim back out to sea? Probably hundreds every day. Do they deserve to die because you want to feel safer in an already statistically safe environment? My answer is no.

Do you wear copious amounts of sunscreen when you go outdoors? Probably not but your chance of dying of cancer is so much higher than getting chomped by a shark, "muppet".


Yes i do - invisible zinc- it minimises my risk
Fisherman will be out there 24/7 in a lot of areas actually - big dollars to be made & they enjoy the thrill.
Yeah the 18 yo just recently & tragically - but now give me the numbers of Shark attack fatalities in the last 20 years for the whole east coast (QLD,NSW & VIC)
We control Wild Roos, Wild Dogs, Wild Horses , Wild Pigs, Wild Rabbits, Wild Foxes, Crocs & Snakes numbers in the hundreds of thousands- this is no different you clown.
Your location lists you as being in QLD - worry about your own backyard.

Muppet !

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 12:56PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
burnsy11 said..
Yeah the 18 yo just recently & tragically - but now give me the numbers of Shark attack fatalities in the last 20 years for the whole east coast (QLD,NSW & VIC).
Your location lists you as being in QLD - worry about your own backyard.







Couldn't find previous 20 yrs but its still FAR higher over ALL of the states as you requested. Looks like we have for more to worry about than you, add in crocs, snakes and stingers....

stoked2surf
WA, 43 posts
11 Dec 2013 11:36AM
Thumbs Up

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 2:13PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector

Freddofrog
WA, 522 posts
11 Dec 2013 1:47PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Monkers said..

Although I am a kitesurfer I have been surfing in WA water for 30 years and finally in the last 2 years I have stopped and have limited my surfing to Indo. Which is a real shame because nothing makes me happier than surfing in WA and enjoying the WA coastline..I'm glad they are doing something about it ( besides research )... I just hope it works...





I think it's more than just fatalities and this is a good example. The government obviously want to stop the extreme outcomes but they also need to manage the impact it is having on people's every days lives.

At the height of summer, I love taking the kids to Cott for a night time swim. Now I've sadly limited that to Hillaries marina. It's impacting the very water loving lifestyle WA/Australia is iconic for.

So I'll support almost any action. Easy to steer a moving ship that a stationary one.

eppo
WA, 9502 posts
11 Dec 2013 2:20PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

PoSM
13 posts
11 Dec 2013 2:33PM
Thumbs Up

I think it should be made law that the shark cull can proceed ONLY if all the kitesurfers and surfers in WA promise to never, ever whinge about overcrowded breaks and spots again.

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:39PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate

kiteboy dave
QLD, 6525 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:48PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
pearl said..
Queeensland has been doing this for years.....


In the name of Tourism. The bycatch is horrendous... Whales. Turtles. Dugong. Dolphins.

burnsy11
WA, 122 posts
11 Dec 2013 3:14PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Haydn24 said..

eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate


Hahaha enough said - some pimply faced kid with his head stuck on his laptop/ipad all day.
And if your going to paste some half assed table of figures - at least show that its from some type of reputable source.

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 5:32PM
Thumbs Up

burnsy11 said..

Haydn24 said..

eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate


Hahaha enough said - some pimply faced kid with his head stuck on his laptop/ipad all day.
And if your going to paste some half assed table of figures - at least show that its from some type of reputable source.


Do you speak to everyone like this? No i'm not a 14 year old, technology dependent pimply kid, I'm an accomplished 20 year old with aspirations and a bright future, obviously something you never had the chance to experience.

You think I made up those stats for the sake of a stupid argument with someone who has no idea what he's talking about? no.

sharkattackfile.info

It's a US based website but accurately accounts for all shark attack occurrences from 1960's on wards.

WC Canvas
WA, 55 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:12PM
Thumbs Up

burnsy11 said..

topline said..

I think maybe that Baits set only 1km on regular basis may attract more sharks??? This is possibly only a 5-10 minute swim for a shark to venture in a bit closer and just take some ones leg off as it will still be in feed mode after sniffing the baits all day long.



I dont think you understand how drum baits work & how effective they are - do some research before commenting.


Cool just checked it out - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drum_lines

hope it works out. When we culled them decades ago there were heaps less attacks?? Just saying would be good when there gone.

burnsy11
WA, 122 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:27PM
Thumbs Up

Haydn24 said..

burnsy11 said..

Haydn24 said..

eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate


Hahaha enough said - some pimply faced kid with his head stuck on his laptop/ipad all day.
And if your going to paste some half assed table of figures - at least show that its from some type of reputable source.


Do you speak to everyone like this? No i'm not a 14 year old, technology dependent pimply kid, I'm an accomplished 20 year old with aspirations and a bright future, obviously something you never had the chance to experience.

You think I made up those stats for the sake of a stupid argument with someone who has no idea what he's talking about? no.

sharkattackfile.info

It's a US based website but accurately accounts for all shark attack occurrences from 1960's on wards.


Take a deep breath from your puffer Haydn....its called humour...fair enough you have high aspirations & bright future ahead - i think most have experienced this when they are younger. The table that you posted is actually occurrences from 1788 onwards....

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
11 Dec 2013 6:37PM
Thumbs Up

Oh yeah? Was Captain Cook reporting shark attacks in Australia was he?

WA71
WA, 1382 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:39PM
Thumbs Up

burnsy11 said..

Haydn24 said..

burnsy11 said..

Haydn24 said..

eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate


Hahaha enough said - some pimply faced kid with his head stuck on his laptop/ipad all day.
And if your going to paste some half assed table of figures - at least show that its from some type of reputable source.


Do you speak to everyone like this? No i'm not a 14 year old, technology dependent pimply kid, I'm an accomplished 20 year old with aspirations and a bright future, obviously something you never had the chance to experience.

You think I made up those stats for the sake of a stupid argument with someone who has no idea what he's talking about? no.

sharkattackfile.info

It's a US based website but accurately accounts for all shark attack occurrences from 1960's on wards.


Take a deep breath from your puffer Haydn....its called humour...fair enough you have high aspirations & bright future ahead - i think most have experienced this when they are younger. The table that you posted is actually occurrences from 1788 onwards....


If thats humour then Im missing something

ChiroTrev
WA, 62 posts
11 Dec 2013 4:49PM
Thumbs Up

I agree with Burnsy, a great victory for WA.....

I also agree we should've tagged sharks years ago, and this could help us better understand them....

Nonetheless, the ocean is in a state of anarchy. We do not let murderers and rapists do what they want and "leave them be in the ecosystem" and advise everyone who steps outside to "face the risk" of being raped or murdered. Instead, we create places for the undesirable people where they do not harm. In some countries they have the death penalty.

So murderers have their place in jail, and sharks have their place deep in the ocean--> not along our shores where innocent people (including children) are encouraged to play, be healthy, and enjoy the outdoors.

Don't start whinging about vending machines and bee's unless you are a total idiot.

We are protecting people in the ocean as we've been protecting people on the land since the dawn of civilisation. Our ecosystem on land is protected by jails, our beaches are now being protected by baited drum lines.

No animal should be killed in vein and the meat should definitely be put to use.

Kangaroo's are culled every day for the benefit of farmers and drivers and they are our national animal. It's not because we hate them but because we ARE managing our ecosystem.

Finally the shark to fish ratio can be improved and our beaches can be protected for us and for future generations.

mazdon
1196 posts
11 Dec 2013 5:12PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
ChiroTrev said..

I agree with Burnsy, a great victory for WA..... this makes me sad

I also agree we should've tagged sharks years ago, and this could help us better understand them.... yes

Nonetheless, the ocean is in a state of anarchy. We do not let murderers and rapists do what they want and "leave them be in the ecosystem" and advise everyone who steps outside to "face the risk" of being raped or murdered. Instead, we create places for the undesirable people where they do not harm. In some countries they have the death penalty. - you are applying human traits such as malicious intent to animals now...

So murderers have their place in jail, and sharks have their place deep in the ocean--> not along our shores where innocent people (including children) are encouraged to play, be healthy, and enjoy the outdoors. - lost for words.

Don't start whinging about vending machines and bee's unless you are a total idiot. - i will respect your wishes.

We are protecting people in the ocean as we've been protecting people on the land since the dawn of civilisation. Our ecosystem on land is protected by jails, our beaches are now being protected by baited drum lines. - is "we" referring to humans" ? or aus civilisation only ? either way, you could argue protectivism has not been a strong point during and since colonisation, especially iof you are an indigenous person

No animal should be killed in vein and the meat should definitely be put to use. - google "heavy metal build up in large pelagic animals"

Kangaroo's are culled every day for the benefit of farmers and drivers and they are our national animal. It's not because we hate them but because we ARE managing our ecosystem. - and the meat is lean and tasty if cooked right.

Finally the shark to fish ratio can be improved and our beaches can be protected for us and for future generations. - protecting beaches... or creating an atmosphere of safety for people?


not sure who said it previously, but i think i got a little dumber reading and responding to this... must stop reading emotive shark posts.

burnsy11
WA, 122 posts
11 Dec 2013 5:24PM
Thumbs Up

No....Captain Cook visited 18 yrs earlier -


Captain Arthur Phillip had settled the British Crown colony of NSW in 1788 & yes they were keeping records.

Jonopark
WA, 400 posts
11 Dec 2013 5:30PM
Thumbs Up

We won. Sharks will get caught and die. Argument over. Anyway for those who are pro culling when is the culling season for snapper ect start. Just got a new rode and keen for a fish. Hope none of you dirty hypocrite hippies go out and cull snapper this year. And i must say, i am impressed how much energy you anti culling hippies have, i mean beibg vegan and all i didnt expect you guys to pipe up so much, let alone use the internet at your communes.

Weta
WA, 893 posts
11 Dec 2013 9:06PM
Thumbs Up

Ah Jono you won did you??? lets wait and see buddy. Sharks & dolphins and other marine life will die to make you feel good. For the record I'm not a hippie or a vegan or any other derogatory minority you want to classify me as. I am disappointed in your point of view but you are entitled to it.

Mark

Jonopark
WA, 400 posts
11 Dec 2013 11:24PM
Thumbs Up

Just stirring the pot mark, (apparently i am a cave man so your side are hippies) but i do believe something must be done. And i rather it done now before the problem/population increases. Seeing two sharks in tgree months and was at scabs today when thr siren went off has reinforced my beliefs.

Weta
WA, 893 posts
11 Dec 2013 11:46PM
Thumbs Up

Jono I'm not stirring anything what I say is what I believe, as I've said I'm no wannabe new age skinny soy café loving vegan hippy but I am someone that loves nature and I get out on the ocean as much as I can & I don't want to see the ocean changed to make the masses which probably includes you who spend 1% at the very most of their time in the ocean feeling all snuggly & safe.

eppo
WA, 9502 posts
12 Dec 2013 7:43AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Haydn24 said..

eppo said...
Haydn24 said..

stoked2surf said..

statistics wise i would be interested what a sharks chance of being killed are... 1 in 1000? 1 in 10?
i mean humans still kill up to 750,000 sharks per day.
and yes you are an idiot for thinking these drum lines don't affect the shark population. while it may not decrease it, it will certainly stop it from recovering.

all these ridiculous arguments, media hype and politically manipulated bills are the reason i gave up marine sciences. humanity, take note, the ecosystem will turn on you.


Yup, currently at JCU in marine biology... the cavemen really ruin it for this sector





how old are you hadyn?

20 mate





Haydn everyone is entitled to their opinion as you are. The reason I asked is I did an triple major in biological and environmental science as well as extractive metallurgy. I was 20 once and exposed to the philosophies and teachings you are now experiencing. So I do understand where you are coming from.

But I will say with time, a wife and two small children the 'caveman' you mentioned does get stronger and that's purely biological, the need to protect your DNA. You cannot take on some of the teachings and not the others. We are in a continual game of life and death and everything is trying to survive as you are and in the end will kill if need be. You cannot escape this biological premise. When ideology meets reality things change. Symbiotic relationships are purely selfish in intent that just work, if they don't one will destroy the other if need be.

Hence it's is such a grey area this one, and I see both extremes in terms of point of views here. More research is needed even in he he name of another PR arm in the governments armour.

SaveTheWhales
WA, 1874 posts
12 Dec 2013 7:49AM
Thumbs Up

Sorry if Ive missed something here... but sharks are fairly clever and when you let off bait drums relatively close to shore it teaches them to 'Peruse' the area...

nice to see theyve learnt fairly quick down scarbs

An eye for an eye + an arm or a leg

Weta
WA, 893 posts
12 Dec 2013 8:47AM
Thumbs Up

Sorry to carry on like a pork chop I'm off to massage my gold fish & have a soy mocha fish burger.

eppo
WA, 9502 posts
12 Dec 2013 9:12AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
SaveTheWhales said..

Sorry if Ive missed something here... but sharks are fairly clever and when you let off bait drums relatively close to shore it teaches them to 'Peruse' the area...

nice to see theyve learnt fairly quick down scarbs

An eye for an eye + an arm or a leg




It will be interesting for sure to see how this pans out. Yes when fishing the dampier archipelago islands, once we had brought in a fish or two, they would cotton on and it was near nigh impossible to bring up a whole fish. They are scavenger hunters and look for prey in distress. We would have to move and resume the process all over again with the same result. They do indeed learn.

But I suppose we are assuming the decision to use baited drums as an actual effective shark protection tool was based purely on a possible solution to this problem. You would have to be somewhat naive to think this. All decisions before and in the future will have some to most, political leverage within the mix. And to say this is wrong is also naive.

rphi6876
29 posts
12 Dec 2013 9:13AM
Thumbs Up

Haydn24 said..

burnsy11 said..
Yeah the 18 yo just recently & tragically - but now give me the numbers of Shark attack fatalities in the last 20 years for the whole east coast (QLD,NSW & VIC).
Your location lists you as being in QLD - worry about your own backyard.







Couldn't find previous 20 yrs but its still FAR higher over ALL of the states as you requested. Looks like we have for more to worry about than you, add in crocs, snakes and stingers....



Your table is wrong. From the FAQ of your website "In most scavenged bodies incidents there is no way to prove if the person was or wasn't alive at the time" - so we just include any carcass found in the water with some bite marks. ie. fishermen who died from hypothermia and eventually a shark finds the carcass will be considered as a fatal shark attack.

Here are more realistic figures:
taronga.org.au/conservation-and-science/australian-shark-attack-file

burnsy11
WA, 122 posts
12 Dec 2013 1:20PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
SaveTheWhales said..

Sorry if Ive missed something here... but sharks are fairly clever and when you let off bait drums relatively close to shore it teaches them to 'Peruse' the area...

nice to see theyve learnt fairly quick down scarbs

An eye for an eye + an arm or a leg


What a nob !! Go bat off over a whale carcass !

Haydn24
QLD, 473 posts
12 Dec 2013 3:38PM
Thumbs Up

rphi6876 said...
Haydn24 said..

burnsy11 said..
Yeah the 18 yo just recently & tragically - but now give me the numbers of Shark attack fatalities in the last 20 years for the whole east coast (QLD,NSW & VIC).
Your location lists you as being in QLD - worry about your own backyard.







Couldn't find previous 20 yrs but its still FAR higher over ALL of the states as you requested. Looks like we have for more to worry about than you, add in crocs, snakes and stingers....



Your table is wrong. From the FAQ of your website "In most scavenged bodies incidents there is no way to prove if the person was or wasn't alive at the time" - so we just include any carcass found in the water with some bite marks. ie. fishermen who died from hypothermia and eventually a shark finds the carcass will be considered as a fatal shark attack.

Here are more realistic figures:
taronga.org.au/conservation-and-science/australian-shark-attack-file

Good point. 20 deaths in WA over the last 200+ years. About one every 10 years, and you want to wipe them out from your coastline? Disgraceful.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"Shark kill zones used to protect beaches" started by burnsy11