Forums > Kitesurfing General

cybernetics

Reply
Created by myusernam > 9 months ago, 7 Jan 2011
This topic has been locked
gordknot
NSW, 148 posts
9 Jan 2011 12:17PM
Thumbs Up

Show Pony wants to create rules and more signage for beach users?? sux to be you, WA

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 9:42AM
Thumbs Up

FYI

Notes -- rsckitesurfing.blogspot.com/2011/01/notes-1.html

Matrix -- rsckitesurfing.blogspot.com/2011/01/matrix-1.html

regards

KnutH
VIC, 426 posts
9 Jan 2011 12:46PM
Thumbs Up

rsc said...

[Quote: "It is VSM System 2 work largely. Not VSM System 5 unless S5 has collapsed into S2 which happens because/when there is not enough wind in systems S3 or S4 domains."] ==> If there is not enough diversity of perspectives and opinions in the mix then those who perform routine administration type work become the 'boss' of the office. Ever seen a PA running a department? Very common in my experience. They do not have the capacity (and it is not a personal thing) in that system 2 role to address other more broader and long-term issues. Who's working in an organisation where the IT service is controlling the world rather than serving it? The vsm view is: if this occurs then the system is therefore unviable when external outside real world events get too much and complex for it. It changes from within, or it is changed from without, or it dies. That is the logic.

See, now it becomes understandable and your collapsing S2 domains become redundant, other than for reference purposes.
But what is the specific application? Are you suggesting that e.g. the AKSA is ruled by dumb officers who just perform routine tasks and can't think outside of the box, hence preventing the kiting community from adapting appropriately to the environment?
Do you want to hire McKinsey consultants instead?


5. Practical solutions. Yes, but this is not the place. That would need face-2-face working with serious people. I have some ideas. I can contribute on a voluntary basis but I am not a paid consultant looking for hire or work.

If you don't want to post your solutions here, what effect to you expect from your efforts, other than making people aware of cybernetics and the SB posting guidelines?
Who are "serious people"?
You have people from kiteboarding governing bodies here, shop owners..


My 'practical advice' based on what I have read here is this: start here and self correct these attitudes and poor conformance with SB forum rules and guidelines. Then participants will become more aware of rules (whatever they are) and start to show more respect. That will then translate towards better self-control on the beaches. Start with small things and bigger things will take care of themselves (largely). Trimtab effect. But first, the problem has to be recognised and not denied. Start with attitude and culture and 80% of the problem will dissolve itself.

Personally I don't see a big issue in the SB rules, as far as I know nobody suffered a heart attack from inappropriate content.
Do you want 5 pages of detailed rules that are inhaled by everyone who signs up here?
Seems quite bureaucratic to me..
Maybe you naturally have to stress the importance of rules in order to convince people to hire cybernetics experts.
What "culture" do you encourage? One where the first step before every action is to establish a set of rules?
Seems rather contradictory to kiteboarding in general, which derives its attraction largely from the aspect of freedom. It's about finding the right balance.


In the meantime I continue with my own private work interpreting this material. I have some early thoughts on some improvements which I'm prepared to share. If you like I will put them in a blog space where you and others can view. They involve defining categories and improving public signage.

You are welcome to do that, but if you hide behind generalizations and cybernetic terms it would be a rather futile effort.

kyteryder
NSW, 692 posts
9 Jan 2011 12:50PM
Thumbs Up

RSC,

You mention that you are unsure of whom DJdojo's posts refers to, but reply as though it has been directed at you. Why is that?

Most sports have a culture, (yes I know you ? This term in reference to kitesurfing).
Surfing, football, fishing, soccer, tennis, dancing, etc......
Not understanding a culture that exists first, will always show ignorance, and retaliatory comments. You seem to enjoy the Internet forum debate, which does show you do have passion for these topics. The interest seems more than an academic, or concerned member of the public.

We do hope you embrace kitesurfing, for the thrill of the sport that it is. Your first big controlled boost, will definitely give you one of the best feelings that you can get from the sport.

Let's hope the wind picks up in all states, so we can let sleeping dogs lie, and get some serious water time.

KR

lotofwind
NSW, 6451 posts
9 Jan 2011 1:20PM
Thumbs Up

kyteryder said...

RSC,

You mention that you are unsure of whom DJdojo's posts refers to, but reply as though it has been directed at you. Why is that?


KR


Well if has approached everything else he has tried in his life the same way he has approached kiteing, I would think he would be use to comments being directed at him.

Maybe start posting in the winsurfers forum RSC, they are more your crowd of people.
Sorry if that has offended any windsurfers.

Maybe kitesurfing and its "enjoy life culture" just isnt your thing.

djdojo
VIC, 1607 posts
9 Jan 2011 1:30PM
Thumbs Up

Anyone familiar with the Book of Job? It involves a pious man who repeatedly makes a category error in responding to adversity, but then, after a harsh lesson, realises the error. Upon repenting and changing his ways his circumstances improve considerably. I am an atheist, but I like the story:

In the course of a test devised for him by Satan and observed by God, Job is assailed by many trying events. Each time he wonders why, and indignantly argues that his treatment is unjust and that his perspective on what should happen is superior to what is actually happening.

Eventually, God has had a gutful and says to the guy, "Shut up and listen, fool. I have some questions for you." The questions are basically along the lines of, "Do you have any freakin idea how the earth/kitesurfing/seabreeze was formed and how it functions?"

Job is forced to concede that there are many things beyond his understanding. He eventually realises that his pious protests were a category error; that instead of endless hubris and argumentation, the appropriate response should have been humility and acceptance.

Part of Job's realisation of his place on earth is his willingness to shut up about certain matters. Happy that Job's conversion is sincere, God allows him to prosper once more.

Comment: A power greater than oneself doesn't have to be a personal god. It could just be a community whose collective experience and wisdom exceeds that of any individual member.

the gibbo
WA, 776 posts
9 Jan 2011 10:50AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote


Comment: A power greater than oneself doesn't have to be a personal god. It could just be a community whose collective experience and wisdom exceeds that of any individual member.


rsc learn from dj
ask questions first, perhaps create new constructive posts asking uncomplicated straightforward questions without the overbearing intelect which you seem to be crooning on the whole time(most people on here dont get it if you havent worked that out already)

crew on here will give answers/suggestions, only then can you understand the sport and its cultures(good and bad) and only then can you put fwd balanced suggestion/more questions on how we can improve

lotofwind
NSW, 6451 posts
9 Jan 2011 1:58PM
Thumbs Up

The only thing worse than a troll,
Is a troll with a thesaurus.

Spacemonkey!
SA, 2288 posts
9 Jan 2011 1:29PM
Thumbs Up

@rsc can I ask what attracted you to kiteboarding?



You do realise kiteboarding is infact an extreme water sport that involves harnessing the wind (mainly through inflatable kites) to traverse through the water at great speed, perform dangerous technical maneuvers and on occasions get flung up high into the air, all in the name of fun.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 11:15AM
Thumbs Up

KnutH said...

rsc said...

[Quote: "It is VSM System 2 work ...

See, now it becomes understandable and your collapsing S2 domains become redundant, other than for reference purposes.
But what is the specific application? Are you suggesting that e.g. the AKSA is ruled by dumb officers who just perform routine tasks and can't think outside of the box, hence preventing the kiting community from adapting appropriately to the environment?
Do you want to hire McKinsey consultants instead?


5. Practical solutions. Yes, but ...


If you don't want to post your solutions here, what effect to you expect from your efforts, other than making people aware of cybernetics and the SB posting guidelines?
Who are "serious people"?
You have people from kiteboarding governing bodies here, shop owners..


My 'practical advice' ... .


Personally I don't see a big issue in the SB rules, as far as I know nobody suffered a heart attack from inappropriate content.
Do you want 5 pages of detailed rules that are inhaled by everyone who signs up here?
Seems quite bureaucratic to me..
Maybe you naturally have to stress the importance of rules in order to convince people to hire cybernetics experts.
What "culture" do you encourage? One where the first step before every action is to establish a set of rules?
Seems rather contradictory to kiteboarding in general, which derives its attraction largely from the aspect of freedom. It's about finding the right balance.


In the meantime I continue with ....


You are welcome to do that, but if you hide behind generalizations and cybernetic terms it would be a rather futile effort.



1. "Are you suggesting that e.g. the AKSA is ruled by dumb officers who ..." -- I am not suggesting anything about the personal qualities of the persons involved. But it does appear from out side the 'black box' that there is room for improvement in at least one area related to managing public outrage to Show Pony risk on public beaches. This may be for good reasons, but it is still the situation of concern that is real. I've seen no answers here. But this SB forum may not be the right place for real answers -- however, you can see several people are trying to make it a more public issue (at least within the kitesurfing fraternity). Otherwise, why the post in the 1st place? I'd assume it is related to overwork, and also perhaps not a better understanding that there are alternatives in order to work more effectively (smarter not harder) with what you've got.

I am suggesting that whatever is, is "hence preventing the kiting community from adapting appropriately to the environment?" This statement looks correct to me. I'm suggesting in a self-help paradigm that culture (as displayed here) is the low hanging fruit that you and others can work with without need for expensive consultants etc.

And "Do you want to hire McKinsey consultants instead?" -- no, I'm suggesting that if 4-5 people here can get their heads around this perspective then they will be able to work out a neat and effective solution that will largely conform to the ethos of the kitesurfing culture (and one I like) -- do it your/our selves an minimise need for oversight and more regulation. If you succeed then it may set the standards and give rise to removing heavy handed regulations in other places as well.

2. "If you don't want to post your solutions here, ..." -- I think I have just posted something (a start at least) just prior to you reply. We crossed in the mail.

"... what effect to you expect from your efforts, other than making people aware of cybernetics and the SB posting guidelines?" -- the effect I'm seeking is a more viable kitesurfing culture and, by implication, safe and responsible and low risk behaviour such that it meets the needs of its members (current & future) and achieves its stated goals and aims (in this case low maintenance and self governance).

3. "Personally I don't see a big issue in the SB rules..." -- SB rules are not the issue.They seem fine to me. I was just using them and the type of martial I'm seeing here as an opportunity to point out a difficult and subtle point about intangible culture and attitudes. The values behind these attitudes can be considered and if addressed (and I'm not saying how to address them effectively) then I believe everyone here will benefit. Public risk and outrage will reduce and kite surfing (with a few minor but fundamental modifications to its operating heuristics) will continue to grow and prosper -- and be inviting to a whole new demographic. One that is mature, responsible, low performance, and not without money. I'm suggesting it is good for business.

4. "Do you want 5 pages of detailed rules that are inhaled by everyone who signs up here?" -- they already exist and should be read and followed I assume. Or are they just window dressing? It is not a SB issue. They look quite good to me. They in no way interfere with what and how I wish to communicate. I've raised a couple of minor cases where I think a more disciplined moderator function would be concerned. Not to admonish or teach moderators -- could not care less. But rather to point to the attitudes behind these examples. They appear to me to either ignorance or willful rebellion against the rules and conventions. I do not like rules either. But some are necessary -- as we know driving on the roads. I would rather use heuristics than rules -- a technical word but it is accurate -- i.e. rules of thumb. Conventions etc. That is what kitesurfing culture is wanting (rather than rules and policies imposed from outside). I agree -- but public safety comes first.

5. I'm not pushing cybernetics. Nor am I touting for business. I study the area and I'm contributing my 2 cents worth like many are, and everyone else should be. Why are they not? That is my culture question. And for me the evidence is here in abundance. Assume a bullying culture and then seek to find evidence to disprove it. Bullying is a low-level 'reptilian brain' governance function/system. It comes into play when there is nothing else higher than it in operation. If it is recognised then it can be dealt with. If it is ignored then it continues and grows.

School yard, place or work, beach. All the same. Cybernetics (or more correctly, management cybernetics) does not give answers. It suggests where to look. It is like an x-ray. One can see the bone fracture. It is radiology. The doctor must them make the call on what to do about it etc. Here it seems that 'doctor' is either some senior leaders (a bit of a paradox in a largely autonomous collective) or, more likely, the community itself as all members self-adjusting to new information in a responsible way. But, in either case you still need to be either largely invisible or communicating effectively with the larger public. Signage is not for kitesurfers per se, it is for the public to know better. No different to jetskis etc in that dept.

6. "Seems rather contradictory to kiteboarding in general, which derives its attraction largely from the aspect of freedom. It's about finding the right balance." -- Yes, here you are getting very close imo. The right balance is exactly what should be sought. That is what a System 5 perspective is and should be trying to achieve. First they have to watch the show. Before that there has to be a show to watch. System 4 can only bring options to the table (as can System 3). In theory we all have all these roles. In practice (i.e. the real world) we perform roles in a more specialized manner and these are 'contracted' with others in a viable community for the greater common good.

The question is: how does kitesurfing become (remain) a viable community that is highly self-regulated and sustainable?

I'm suggesting:

(a) more effective self-regulation through cultural adjustments; and

(b) better communications with the wider public to demonstrate responsibility and help them judge better what is acceptable and what is not at 'Brighton' beach. At least as a start.

shannon8888
NSW, 517 posts
9 Jan 2011 2:20PM
Thumbs Up

rsc said...

KnutH said...

rsc said...

[Quote: "It is VSM System 2 work ...

See, now it becomes understandable and your collapsing S2 domains become redundant, other than for reference purposes.
But what is the specific application? Are you suggesting that e.g. the AKSA is ruled by dumb officers who just perform routine tasks and can't think outside of the box, hence preventing the kiting community from adapting appropriately to the environment?
Do you want to hire McKinsey consultants instead?


5. Practical solutions. Yes, but ...


If you don't want to post your solutions here, what effect to you expect from your efforts, other than making people aware of cybernetics and the SB posting guidelines?
Who are "serious people"?
You have people from kiteboarding governing bodies here, shop owners..


My 'practical advice' ... .


Personally I don't see a big issue in the SB rules, as far as I know nobody suffered a heart attack from inappropriate content.
Do you want 5 pages of detailed rules that are inhaled by everyone who signs up here?
Seems quite bureaucratic to me..
Maybe you naturally have to stress the importance of rules in order to convince people to hire cybernetics experts.
What "culture" do you encourage? One where the first step before every action is to establish a set of rules?
Seems rather contradictory to kiteboarding in general, which derives its attraction largely from the aspect of freedom. It's about finding the right balance.


In the meantime I continue with ....


You are welcome to do that, but if you hide behind generalizations and cybernetic terms it would be a rather futile effort.



1. "Are you suggesting that e.g. the AKSA is ruled by dumb officers who ..." -- I am not suggesting anything about the personal qualities of the persons involved. But it does appear from out side the 'black box' that there is room for improvement in at least one area related to managing public outrage to Show Pony risk on public beaches. This may be for good reasons, but it is still the situation of concern that is real. I've seen no answers here. But this SB forum may not be the right place for real answers -- however, you can see several people are trying to make it a more public issue (at least within the kitesurfing fraternity). Otherwise, why the post in the 1st place? I'd assume it is related to overwork, and also perhaps not a better understanding that there are alternatives in order to work more effectively (smarter not harder) with what you've got.

I am suggesting that whatever is, is "hence preventing the kiting community from adapting appropriately to the environment?" This statement looks correct to me. I'm suggesting in a self-help paradigm that culture (as displayed here) is the low hanging fruit that you and others can work with without need for expensive consultants etc.

And "Do you want to hire McKinsey consultants instead?" -- no, I'm suggesting that if 4-5 people here can get their heads around this perspective then they will be able to work out a neat and effective solution that will largely conform to the ethos of the kitesurfing culture (and one I like) -- do it your/our selves an minimise need for oversight and more regulation. If you succeed then it may set the standards and give rise to removing heavy handed regulations in other places as well.

2. "If you don't want to post your solutions here, ..." -- I think I have just posted something (a start at least) just prior to you reply. We crossed in the mail.

"... what effect to you expect from your efforts, other than making people aware of cybernetics and the SB posting guidelines?" -- the effect I'm seeking is a more viable kitesurfing culture and, by implication, safe and responsible and low risk behaviour such that it meets the needs of its members (current & future) and achieves its stated goals and aims (in this case low maintenance and self governance).

3. "Personally I don't see a big issue in the SB rules..." -- SB rules are not the issue.They seem fine to me. I was just using them and the type of martial I'm seeing here as an opportunity to point out a difficult and subtle point about intangible culture and attitudes. The values behind these attitudes can be considered and if addressed (and I'm not saying how to address them effectively) then I believe everyone here will benefit. Public risk and outrage will reduce and kite surfing (with a few minor but fundamental modifications to its operating heuristics) will continue to grow and prosper -- and be inviting to a whole new demographic. One that is mature, responsible, low performance, and not without money. I'm suggesting it is good for business.

4. "Do you want 5 pages of detailed rules that are inhaled by everyone who signs up here?" -- they already exist and should be read and followed I assume. Or are they just window dressing? It is not a SB issue. They look quite good to me. They in no way interfere with what and how I wish to communicate. I've raised a couple of minor cases where I think a more disciplined moderator function would be concerned. Not to admonish or teach moderators -- could not care less. But rather to point to the attitudes behind these examples. They appear to me to either ignorance or willful rebellion against the rules and conventions. I do not like rules either. But some are necessary -- as we know driving on the roads. I would rather use heuristics than rules -- a technical word but it is accurate -- i.e. rules of thumb. Conventions etc. That is what kitesurfing culture is wanting (rather than rules and policies imposed from outside). I agree -- but public safety comes first.

5. I'm not pushing cybernetics. Nor am I touting for business. I study the area and I'm contributing my 2 cents worth like many are, and everyone else should be. Why are they not? That is my culture question. And for me the evidence is here in abundance. Assume a bullying culture and then seek to find evidence to disprove it. Bullying is a low-level 'reptilian brain' governance function/system. It comes into play when there is nothing else higher than it in operation. If it is recognised then it can be dealt with. If it is ignored then it continues and grows.

School yard, place or work, beach. All the same. Cybernetics (or more correctly, management cybernetics) does not give answers. It suggests where to look. It is like an x-ray. One can see the bone fracture. It is radiology. The doctor must them make the call on what to do about it etc. Here it seems that 'doctor' is either some senior leaders (a bit of a paradox in a largely autonomous collective) or, more likely, the community itself as all members self-adjusting to new information in a responsible way. But, in either case you still need to be either largely invisible or communicating effectively with the larger public. Signage is not for kitesurfers per se, it is for the public to know better. No different to jetskis etc in that dept.

6. "Seems rather contradictory to kiteboarding in general, which derives its attraction largely from the aspect of freedom. It's about finding the right balance." -- Yes, here you are getting very close imo. The right balance is exactly what should be sought. That is what a System 5 perspective is and should be trying to achieve. First they have to watch the show. Before that there has to be a show to watch. System 4 can only bring options to the table (as can System 3). In theory we all have all these roles. In practice (i.e. the real world) we perform roles in a more specialized manner and these are 'contracted' with others in a viable community for the greater common good.

The question is: how does kitesurfing become (remain) a viable community that is highly self-regulated and sustainable?

I'm suggesting:

(a) more effective self-regulation through cultural adjustments; and

(b) better communications with the wider public to demonstrate responsibility and help them judge better what is acceptable and what is not at 'Brighton' beach. At least as a start.



mate just go away would you

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 11:22AM
Thumbs Up

Spacemonkey! said...

@rsc can I ask what attracted you to kiteboarding?

[video]

You do realise kiteboarding is infact an extreme water sport that involves harnessing the wind (mainly through inflatable kites) to traverse through the water at great speed, perform dangerous technical maneuvers and on occasions get flung up high into the air, all in the name of fun.


1. It is also other things such as cruising. Well at least the equipment is common. Perhaps there is a new category of 'sport' I'm relating to.

2. I was attracted by the Canadian Cooking Lake type scenario. The video is listed in other threads. It involves self launch and private experience in a wilderness scene of great beauty. Here I only have my local beach which does supply ideal environments during certain hours. Not many Show Ponies around at those times thank goodness.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 11:41AM
Thumbs Up

Spacemonkey! said...

@rsc can I ask what attracted you to kiteboarding?
[video -- Lion Tamer]

You do realise kiteboarding is infact an extreme water sport that involves harnessing the wind (mainly through inflatable kites) to traverse through the water at great speed, perform dangerous technical maneuvers and on occasions get flung up high into the air, all in the name of fun.


You do realise that you are just representing one aspect of it. I'd suggest there is a lot more scope for less extreme enjoyment with same or similar equipment. New demographic perhaps?

You video choice was good.

In return mine would be The LumberJack -- this is not the best version but too little time. You should be able to get the message.

Wind is coming in and I'm off down to enjoy a 18-20 km/h experience.

I'm a kiteman and I'm ok ..... (back to the day job boy & girls!)

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 11:45AM
Thumbs Up

djdojo said...

Anyone familiar with the Book of Job? It involves a pious man who repeatedly makes a category error in responding to adversity, but then, after a harsh lesson, realises the error. Upon repenting and changing his ways his circumstances improve considerably. I am an atheist, but I like the story:

In the course of a test devised for him by Satan and observed by God, Job is assailed by many trying events. Each time he wonders why, and indignantly argues that his treatment is unjust and that his perspective on what should happen is superior to what is actually happening.

Eventually, God has had a gutful and says to the guy, "Shut up and listen, fool. I have some questions for you." The questions are basically along the lines of, "Do you have any freakin idea how the earth/kitesurfing/seabreeze was formed and how it functions?"

Job is forced to concede that there are many things beyond his understanding. He eventually realises that his pious protests were a category error; that instead of endless hubris and argumentation, the appropriate response should have been humility and acceptance.

Part of Job's realisation of his place on earth is his willingness to shut up about certain matters. Happy that Job's conversion is sincere, God allows him to prosper once more.

Comment: A power greater than oneself doesn't have to be a personal god. It could just be a community whose collective experience and wisdom exceeds that of any individual member.


Interesting twist on the story Preacher.

But not my interpretation.

lotofwind
NSW, 6451 posts
9 Jan 2011 2:51PM
Thumbs Up

From the book of "Nut Job"^^

the gibbo
WA, 776 posts
9 Jan 2011 11:53AM
Thumbs Up

Do you have a car rsc ?

I presume so, so if you drive 20-30 mins north of brighton, you can kite on your own, no show ponies, cybernetics(although no doubt this still applies every where omg) etc etc blah blah

then there is no need for this post at all because you will be on the edge of real mainstream society and on your own, or are you there already ? i am not insulting you by the way and please dont take this comment like that, it is a question of my perception of your personality of which i am allowed in my free and uncontrolled mind

i would reccomend a life jacket for such pursuits on ya own, mildly dangerous with or without your level of inexperience

good luck enjoy, over and out

Trant
NSW, 601 posts
9 Jan 2011 4:28PM
Thumbs Up



To summarise for those people who don't want to read through the blurb on his blog

1) Make experienced kiters pay a premium for AKSA insurance and "supervision". (!!?!?!)
2) Close the beach to experienced kiters for winds less than 20 knots or at certain time slots. Close the beach to beginners for winds more than 20 knots or at certain time slots.
3) Confiscate the equipment of any aggressive "showponys", then drug test them.

Good luck with that.


Bigwavedave
QLD, 2057 posts
9 Jan 2011 4:18PM
Thumbs Up

anyone here kite in 15 km/h winds?

poor relative
WA, 9089 posts
9 Jan 2011 2:21PM
Thumbs Up

Bigwavedave said...

anyone here kite in 15 km/h winds?


rsc said...
New demographic perhaps?

seafever17
WA, 360 posts
9 Jan 2011 3:03PM
Thumbs Up

Early in the show pony thread you were venting about how the young instructor attempted to help you because she perceived a need too, before you pitched yourself into the dunes. You believed there was nothing wrong and you did not warrant her intervention. You went on ad infinitum.She could be sued and lose everything blah blah blah.

Now, you, a virtual non kiter are proposing kitesurfing change because you perceive a need.
we dont want your intervention.
Sound familiar to you???
Youv done a 180.
You cant follow your own crap
But you propose we do!!!! Not in this lifetime.









lotofwind
NSW, 6451 posts
9 Jan 2011 6:04PM
Thumbs Up

(#) - in other words, I perceived it as a S2 function interfering with valid 3*-to-S3
communications. Systems 3/3* & 4, & 5 have far higher variety than 2.



Damn it Russell,,,,you sunk my battle ship

trevor1
WA, 598 posts
9 Jan 2011 3:18PM
Thumbs Up

H2fly - should we blame you?


Hi Ben

I heard the news the other day when I went in to pick up the new harness (which works really well for me).

Reading these comments makes this 'sport' sound like a disaster zone.

I'm only in it for the cruising and hope these type of injuries are limited to the specky tricks dept!

Anyway, thanks for your help and hope you get well soon.

Cheers
Russell

(p.s. I'm making slow progress...)


Bigwavedave
QLD, 2057 posts
9 Jan 2011 5:53PM
Thumbs Up

BTW: I got up for about 5-10 seconds yesterday (yeh, laugh!) ... however it all worked so well and easy and quick that I was so surprised and didn't know where to look and fell off again. But definitely caught the bug! Just got to do the hours and get a few angles right(er).


That was new years eve and he got up for 5 seconds. A week ago.

And self launching?

WTF??

Lethal Dons
SA, 19 posts
9 Jan 2011 6:28PM
Thumbs Up


rsc
"Not scared. Just concerned and taking precautions. It is about risk management."

You do realise despite the advances in kite safety over the last few years this is classed as an extreme sport! You should worry less about a few pointless threats / words on a thread. Concentrate on the immediate danger "YOU". This whole thing has spread like wild fire from the fact you posted about a botched self launch that you didnt consider 100% your fault. You have since gone on to flame numerous threads posts about "cybernetics" Who cares i visit seabreeze to find out about a sport i enjoy and feel apart off not to shift through countless threads off random crap. Kitesurfing can go wrong if you dont take the correct precautions and "100% RESPONSIBILITY and OWNERSHIP" of your equipment, you should be scared! failure to take 100% can cause real injury/ death not only to your self but those around you. "THATS A FACT!!!!"

kyteryder
NSW, 692 posts
9 Jan 2011 7:55PM
Thumbs Up

I agree with RSC that show ponies are dangerous and unsafe to the public.
I also believe ignorance and the inability to listen to safety advice from a professional instructor is just as dangerous.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 6:02PM
Thumbs Up

kyteryder said...

I agree with RSC that show ponies are dangerous and unsafe to the public.
I also believe ignorance and the inability to listen to safety advice from a professional instructor is just as dangerous.



I note the personal attack and hunting pack are at it again! (not this comment which is not noise).

The issues raised are not related to cybernetics and belong to another topic.

How do these type of personal attacks and vilifications (just above) -- that have been made without respite and repeated ad nauseam -- relate to the topic here?

Anyway, I basically agree with you, but would rephrase your 2nd point thus: "I also believe ignorance and the inability to listen to safety advice from a professional instructor is dangerous."

rsc
WA, 96 posts
9 Jan 2011 6:06PM
Thumbs Up

lotofwind said...

(#) - in other words, I perceived it as a S2 function interfering with valid 3*-to-S3
communications. Systems 3/3* & 4, & 5 have far higher variety than 2.



Damn it Russell,,,,you sunk my battle ship


Read your profile and like your attitude.

Your 2 y.o. is 1000% ahead of some of the clowns in this Cirque du Soleil!

kyteryder
NSW, 692 posts
9 Jan 2011 9:29PM
Thumbs Up

I have no problem with the way you restructured my sentence, and am glad you have agreed that listening is important in the safety of yourself and others

I have not personally attacked you or any others with my comments. My observations are based upon your continual posts by yourself in various threads, and does not attack or vilify anyone personally. If you are taking this personally then i am sorry. It was supporting the previous comments about safety, and listening to advice.

Hope you had an enjoyable kite this afternoon.

Kr

myusernam
QLD, 6133 posts
9 Jan 2011 8:32PM
Thumbs Up


Rsc you have no life mate. Why would you spend so much time drafting such long reports and posts. you need to get yourself some healthy outdoors interests and have some fun. If you look around on seabreeze you will find people raving about kiting, windsurfing, supping etc. They hang out here because they love their sport so much they cant get enough of it and so when they're not out doing it they come here to read about the sport they love and also make friends, share a joke etc.

You should keep kiteboarding up and maybe the thrill of the sport will grab you and you will look back and think to yourself "I wasted all that time reading and then writing about that crap" Surely even people that do this stuff for a living find it dry? If you do it for a living then why are you writing about it here?

Don't you have a family you could spend time with? A hobby that consumes you? (keep kitesurfing up) Don't you have stuff that needs doing round the house? If you've got that much energy why not try some charity work, rather than trying to argue with people.

Also if you are communicating to people the golden rule is to communicate in a language that they will understand. Obviously not many people are fluent in cyber****e (why would they be, sounds like a intellectual quirk that never took off)

You shouldn't use anacronims or abbreviations that your audience can not reasonably be expected to know (vsm2 or theta level 6 or whathaveyou). Also you should learn how to make a point without using so many words.




Subscribe
Topic Is Locked

This topic has been locked

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"cybernetics" started by myusernam