And it is now pre-orderable on the site. Planned availability August 10th.
7 sizes to choose from, from 4'8" 48 liters to 7'5" 200 liters
The same price as the cheapest Gong hard construction (wood2x), and a tad lighter.
Two thirds of the price of the high end Gong carbon boards (PVC carbon sandwich), but a bit heavier.
The shapes differ a bit between sizes: the bigger ones are more streamlined.
Note that the resulting board is quite cheap, considering the price of the high quality materials: just the 2.5kg pre-preg carbon plate would amount to about 500 euros to manufacture by itself in small quantities. The benefits of direct manufacturing and sales and economies of scale.
They have more volume for the same length than hard boards because thickness cannot be tapered at the tips. So, if length is important for you (for the row effect for SUP foiling for instance), you may have to get more volume than a rigid board.
Range:
Note: the graph above depends a lot on the level of the rider for the Wing and SUP use.
Less than a $1000 dollars for a 5 foot 1
Wonder if they will ship to Aus ?
I've had a wing sent to NZ, so I expect AUS is no problem.
I will be looking hard at this as an option...
Another bit of info:
- the bigger sizes, 6'5" and 7'5" come with a central fin box, so you can put a fin in it to help learning to wing, as the board turning off the wind is a common problem for wing beginners
A cut-out of the construction:And just for the pleasure of the eyes:
No handles on that thing?
You can add as much as you want, with some PVC glue. And wrap it with more neoprene to add a rear strap, or use stick on straps (I dunno if the NSI ones stick to inflatables, however)
Note that you can also add a mastfoot for windsurfing. Either with the pendleboard kit:
pendleboard.com/wp-content/uploads/downloads/Foot-mast-kit-user.pdf
or by gluing a fin box made for inflatables and adding side supports like for the pendleboard kit above.
And it will be in a carton not much bigger than a foil set package
I must say the case seems quite practical. Picture going to the beach in summer on your (electric) bike with all your wing gear in cases...
Just my thoughts anyway,
Of course, we are all different, with different tastes, practices and uses. Gong will not stop doing hard boards because they have inflatables in their SUP, Surf, and now Foil lines. And you are free to buy and make whatever you like.
We are now seeing people cancelling their Wing foil hard board orders to switch for this inflatable. And more would have done the same if it had been available sooner. Most people Winging here do not seem to need (yet?) the higher performance of rigid boards, and some are attracted to the resilience and softer-on-the body-in-falls of inflatables. But it may be different for surf foilers and maybe SUP foilers. Me, for instance, I do not use inflatables to SUP surf, but as a casual foiler with a hard SUP foil board taking room in my van, but seldom used I can see me in the future making some room in my van by replacing it with an inflatable, to make room for another SUP hard board that would have tantalized me ;-)
Or on the other hand, if I was addicted to the foil, I would probably only have rigid foil boards, plus an inflatable SUP tucked in a corner of my van for using casually from time to time...
Also, in Europe, a lot of people do not live close to the sea, and have small cars or live in small flats.
So we will see. This is just added choice, nobody is forcing you to buy anything!
I'd like to know how performant those inflatable foil boards are for winging when it comes to unsticking from the water surface.
They have a very flat bottom. No recess at the back or around, no double concave etc... Are those designs thrown out of the window once you have "air" or is it impossible to engineer those shapes with inflatables ?
I have a 5'3 x 110L inflatable foilboard. I have used it from 10-30kts with wing sizes from 6m down to 2.8m. Don't need complex bottom shapes - generally 3 pumps and you're up. Light board weight and short length seem to help a lot
They have a very flat bottom. No recess at the back or around, no double concave etc... Are those designs thrown out of the window once you have "air" or is it impossible to engineer those shapes with inflatables ?
First, I guess the Hipe has been designed mainly as a Wing foil board, as the lack of a rear footstrap seems to indicate (the Gong team does not use a rear strap for winging, but still use it for surf and SUP foiling).
And to be honest, the tail whistle seems only needed when you pump your board onto the foil by rocking it, and also by interacting with the push of a wave. I have read from more than one shaper of rigid foil boards that for winging on flat water, unlike SUP foiling in waves, the tail whistle was more detrimental (loss of stability, less clean water release) than beneficial.Also, containing the row effect is not an issue on a wing board, as opposed as on a SUP foil board, when bottom and rail shape can be extremely useful.
Plus, due to the overall thickness, inflatables Wing foil boards are shorter for the same volume than rigid boards, and this short length helps a lot. Basically it is like you had cut off the whistle tail altogether, not that you have "filled the whistle".
But you may be right for the bigger beginner sizes, 6'5" and 7'5". And SUP Foilng. We will see.
I have checked them but the GONG seems to have more quality definitely. For the same price range I would take the gong for sure.
anyone checked out manta foils yet? been doing blowups for a while now.
www.mantafoils.com/
The price looks good and having both Deep Tuttle and plate mounts is good. Graphics are awful.
It's a bit of a worry that they've been around for a while but made no impression on the scene. The Gong product seems more appealing, mainly because it's newer and Gong are better at informing people about their products (which is sort of the same as marketing).
Apart from less storage space and travel, are there any other reasons why once would get an inflatable over a solid board ?
I m thinking they could be more durable. Drop it on concrete or bang it on a post or doorway while carrying likely no damage and no cracks around the foil tracks leading to heavy foam cores. Would prefer to see and ideally paddle one first though as the rounded rails might make for harder paddling
Overall I think they look pretty good , heaps better than the Manta IMHO but I tend to agree with Jacko's earlier comment boards are so small now and under all the airline restrictions, the inflatable seems to loose it biggest pro. Still nice design and looks like a good build .
The Gong product seems more appealing, mainly because it's newer and Gong are better at informing people about their products (which is sort of the same as marketing).
And not to forget that they actually also use their products daily, by the whole team with various levels of expertise. They do not simply give some gear to sponsored riders just to make a photoshoot. Also the quantities they manufacture create important economies of scale, so the product can be cheaper for the same quality, so they sell more... a virtuous circle. The drawback is that they cannot add a model in their lines if they are not confident that it will sell well.
On the inflatable foil boards, my understanding is that it took a full year to design/prototype/test a system that was rigid enough so they thought enough people would buy it.
More info (22mn) on the Hipe by Patrice himself. French audio, with English subtitles. Especially on the pro and cons wrt the Gong rigid boards. He says at 13'15" that of all the Gong Wingfoil boards, the Hipe is the one with which he takes off the earliest. And that plane travel was not the main design goal, but the general easy of learning and general use.
The hype for the HIPE is real!
Pre-order in.
Has anyone received an overseas shipping quote for one of these yet?
anyone checked out manta foils yet? been doing blowups for a while now.
www.mantafoils.com/
The price looks good and having both Deep Tuttle and plate mounts is good. Graphics are awful.
It's a bit of a worry that they've been around for a while but made no impression on the scene. The Gong product seems more appealing, mainly because it's newer and Gong are better at informing people about their products (which is sort of the same as marketing).
they seem to be a small scaled production facility in Dubai. no massive marketing budget, and definitely not geared to the masses, but leading with strong innovation. they certainly have a hands on control on quality which i think others would struggle with when getting made elsewhere
a hands on control on quality which i think others would struggle with when getting made elsewhere
There is no way you can manufacture an inflatable board in Dubai...
The sizing of the Hipe 5'5" looks pretty appealing to me. Checked out the Manta gear, the 150l is a competitor and a Tuttle box is a bonus. Longer length of the Manta is a negative and it the shorter foil plate (Looking at the photo) might be a deal breaker. A head to head comparison would be VERY interesting
A head to head comparison would be VERY interesting
But seeing that that I could not find any test, review, of even a post by somebody having just bought one after all this time, I would not hold my breath ;-)
a hands on control on quality which i think others would struggle with when getting made elsewhere
There is no way you can manufacture an inflatable board in Dubai...
didnt say they were. if you assumed that its your mistake....
The sizing of the Hipe 5'5" looks pretty appealing to me. Checked out the Manta gear, the 150l is a competitor and a Tuttle box is a bonus. Longer length of the Manta is a negative and it the shorter foil plate (Looking at the photo) might be a deal breaker. A head to head comparison would be VERY interesting
it would be interesting to see.
considering how dismissive colas is of other brands bar gong, even if there were comparissons he'd be dismissive of that too.
i think price is going to be a strong factor in any choice, and buying two inflatable boards to run them head to head would be excessive.
i was keen on an inflatable board a few years back but held back on buying because i'd only use it for long distance travel. thankfully with corona and a smaller budget it seems my choice not to buy has paid off.
heres a bit of a write up regrading manta
www.nzsailing.com/manta-inflatable-170-sup-windfoil-board-goodshark225-1394514
considering how dismissive colas is of other brands bar gong,
I think that people messaging/email me for advice can testify that I do not hesitate to praise and recommend other brands if they are more adapted to their needs and well built/designed. Off the top of my head, recently: Jimmy Lewis, Infinity, Sunova, ... (and Quobba of course, and O&E leashes, even though Gong makes fins and leashes).
Here we are on a topic specific to inflatable foil boards.
heres a bit of a write up regrading manta
That is not a first hand review, it is the brand marketing material recopied onto a shop site. And even not of the Wing/SUP foil board model.
Or do you not even read what you post?
You do not seem to be able to understand the difference between an objective statement (I cannot find a 3rd party review of model X of Brand Y) that I did (and only in response to provocative posts - not speaking of the one by Stretchy, which is OK by me) , and a subjective one (This model is good/bad), that I did not do.
Go to the NZ Sailing website, look under the Manta Wing Board, there's a copy of a review I did on the Manta 110 from the local Kiwi Foil Froth Facebook user group. It was used with my permission. I use a wide range of gear as I am always looking to optimise my winging set up, no formal brand affiliations. It looks like Gong have done a nice job , but just because you havent heard much about the Manta doesn't mean that Manta have done a bad job, just that they are a much smaller company and don't have the marketing footprint.
That's hilarious. So what do they make at the "small scale production facility in Dubai" then?