Forums > Stand Up Paddle   Board Talk & Reviews

psh hull rippers

Reply
Created by Radman > 9 months ago, 8 Sep 2011
AA
NSW, 2159 posts
16 Sep 2011 10:10AM
Thumbs Up

CB1 said...

AA, the US distributor website is saying to go 3 inches longer than you normally ride. I've also been told 6 inches longer. What have you heard?

Any inside scoop if they will be making them shorter than 8'9?



CB1, broadly there will be 3 types of riders who look at these boards-

1. Guys who surf regularly that can surf a 'fence post' and will tell you that these boards are as stable as there flat bottom counterparts.

2. Average weekly-warrior (pidgion holing myself here) who gets out once a week if they are lucky and errs on comfort and stability. At this stage I would say go up a size to what you use on a flat bottomed board.

3. Crew who's expectations are probably beyond their ability and should prob stick with the larger Wide Rippers - 9'2 9'11 10'6

I can pretty much say this without actually trying them, that the 9'11HullR will not be as stable for the average rider as the 9'11 XWRipper.

I can also say that you would not regret going up in size with these new designs but you could well regret going too short.

There are more HR's both shorter and longer in the pipe but no ETA as yet.

CB1
23 posts
16 Sep 2011 9:26AM
Thumbs Up

Thanks AA! Nice breakdown!

I can see going longer on the "Pro" models, but didn't know if it held true for the "wide" models.

Again, thank you for the comments!

Leroy13
VIC, 1174 posts
18 Sep 2011 3:07PM
Thumbs Up

I meant to say thanks Hilly!!! I generally surf anything up to 6ft and 8ft if it is a nice slow old man's wave. My major concern is catching a rail after hitting the lip. We had some good waves in Vicco on Thursday and the Hull Paddler decided to give me a heart punch as it caught its rail on the way back round on a solid little 4 footer. I then snapped the leg rope to add insult to injury. Have you tried the Allwave as well Hilly? I'n looking forward to your comparison..Cheers and thanks again Leroy

hilly
WA, 7294 posts
18 Sep 2011 6:49PM
Thumbs Up

Leroy13 said...

I meant to say thanks Hilly!!! I generally surf anything up to 6ft and 8ft if it is a nice slow old man's wave. My major concern is catching a rail after hitting the lip. We had some good waves in Vicco on Thursday and the Hull Paddler decided to give me a heart punch as it caught its rail on the way back round on a solid little 4 footer. I then snapped the leg rope to add insult to injury. Have you tried the Allwave as well Hilly? I'n looking forward to your comparison..Cheers and thanks again Leroy


Might be able to get one from DM but they are really different boards. Allwave looks like a generalist like the Naish mana. The hull rippers are aimed squarely at riding good waves.

AA
NSW, 2159 posts
24 Sep 2011 1:43PM
Thumbs Up

Just received the Volumes for the Hull Ripper range

9'2” x 30 3/4” x 4 1/4” 9-2 Hull Ripper 126L
9'6” x 30 1/2” x 4 3/8” 9-6 Hull Ripper 139L
9'11” x 31” x 4 1/4” 9-11 Hull Ripper 142L


8'9” x 30 1/8” x 4 1/4” 8-9 Hull Ripper 119L
9'1” x 28 7/8” x 4 1/4” 9-1 Hull Ripper Pro 121L
9'6” x 28 7/8” x 4 1/4” 9-6 Hull Ripper Pro 127L

Keep in mind these new Hull shapes are a completely different animal's and as such these volumes don't really relate to the board you are riding now, other than a broad guide.

You need a bit of extra width and length to get the same feel of a flat bottomed board, yet they surf like a board much shorter and paddle like a short (wide) race board.

Here is the first of 2 Videos where Blane explains the new designs and how they should be ridden-



... and Noah Yap dong what he does best!



AA
NSW, 2159 posts
24 Sep 2011 1:48PM
Thumbs Up

This goes back a few months but if you missed it, this is a great thread where Blane comes in and talks at length about high performance surfing and the development of the Hull Rippers. It is a very good read.

www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Stand-Up-Paddle/SUP/Hull-Ripper-vid/?page=1

hilly
WA, 7294 posts
24 Sep 2011 7:28PM
Thumbs Up

Leroy13 said...

I meant to say thanks Hilly!!! I generally surf anything up to 6ft and 8ft if it is a nice slow old man's wave. My major concern is catching a rail after hitting the lip. We had some good waves in Vicco on Thursday and the Hull Paddler decided to give me a heart punch as it caught its rail on the way back round on a solid little 4 footer. I then snapped the leg rope to add insult to injury. Have you tried the Allwave as well Hilly? I'n looking forward to your comparison..Cheers and thanks again Leroy


Tried the 9 6 HR and the 9 1 Kwad back to back today.

HR fast down the line gunny feel loved the bigger waves bottom turned a treat, bit wobbly with the round bottom. Kwad heaps more rocker slower down the line needs pumping, bottom turn less drive but snaps under the lip heaps quicker and better bouncing of the wash. Kwad more stable bit less float.

Horses for courses bigger waves the HR would rock, oh and barrel riding holds nice and tight.

Totally different boards, recommend you paddle the HR in good sized surf to get a feel for it's potential if you demo.

AKSonline
WA, 925 posts
Site Sponsor
24 Sep 2011 11:53PM
Thumbs Up

Hi Hilly,

Not sure if the Allwave is what you guys are looking for, but it is a damn fun board with good performance.

I have a 9'2" you can borrow if you like.

DM

Leroy13
VIC, 1174 posts
25 Sep 2011 9:45AM
Thumbs Up

Thanks Hilly. I reckon the HR might be too much for me at my age and back condition. I think AKS is probably closer to the money for me. Please keep the reports coming champ!!. They are much appreciated!

hilly
WA, 7294 posts
25 Sep 2011 9:56PM
Thumbs Up

AKSonline said...

Hi Hilly,

Not sure if the Allwave is what you guys are looking for, but it is a damn fun board with good performance.

I have a 9'2" you can borrow if you like.

DM


I will stand by my previous comment prefer a dedicated wave board which the HR is

Thanks anyway

Radman
WA, 629 posts
26 Sep 2011 7:58AM
Thumbs Up

had 3 sessions on the 9'1' pro hr over the weekend ,first one at sunset in head high glassy reefbreak,only had the fins it came with 7' center and medium size thrusters,first two waves spun out on bottom turn,got it to gether after that found it still very slippery,stability in the glassy water was ok ,wind soon came in and chopped it up,made for a challenge to stay aboard, at80kg the board sits low in the water.i dont rate the fins they come with very highly so put the quads of my jl in for the next day,rode beachbreaks in light onshore conditions found the board gets into waves easily,snakes from rail to rail well ,is fast down the line and feels at ease under neath the lip,going off the topis a breeze the bevelled rail foward never catches,even when you are late getting up the wave it just rides up and over,did some realy nice floaters on this board the extra weight it carries sends you gliding along the lip for ever and then landings are a sinch as the hull nose and foward rails never catch or nosedive,all in all i rate the board 8/10 it is a mental challenge to keep the thing stable at rest,its a shame its not 2kg lighter ,overall happy with purchase i feel it will make me a better paddler but will be a joy to bet back on the jl kwad.

Radman
WA, 629 posts
1 Oct 2011 6:55AM
Thumbs Up

droped in a set of gerry lopez,quads into the 9'1' pro ,nice fins ,similar area to the jl kwad stock fins but the side fins have the innerfoil.seems to have quickend the board up and made it looser nice work futures

robg1703
NSW, 219 posts
1 Oct 2011 3:20PM
Thumbs Up

HI AA,
I've just had 2 surfs on the new 9'6 Hull Ripper (normally ride a 8'9 l/weight ripper) and my first thoughts were that it reminded me of an Italian Supermodel or Sportscar.
Looks insane but too much going on and doesn't know what it's doing!
But after my 2nd surf i'm hooked. Stable (once you get used to the 2 stage tippiness like my 12'6 JM raceboard) and surfed really smoothly. The waves were only 2 foot little runners but it went off the top nicely and was very forgiving.
I set it up as a quad but probably too long for a comp board so i'm keen to try the 8'9 (i'm 80kg)

AA
NSW, 2159 posts
2 Oct 2011 4:51PM
Thumbs Up

Radman said...

droped in a set of gerry lopez,quads into the 9'1' pro ,nice fins ,similar area to the jl kwad stock fins but the side fins have the innerfoil.seems to have quickend the board up and made it looser nice work futures


Hey Radman, keep playing. You will find the right combo for your conditions up there in Gerro. The stability of the HRippers is quite different to traditional flat bottom boards. To get the equivalent stability of the the JL Quad 9'1" X 30" you would need to go 31" wide in a Hull Ripper. However you will get used to it very quickly - they roll like a race board but don't go all the way.

robg1703 said...

HI AA,
I've just had 2 surfs on the new 9'6 Hull Ripper (normally ride a 8'9 l/weight ripper) and my first thoughts were that it reminded me of an Italian Supermodel or Sportscar.
Looks insane but too much going on and doesn't know what it's doing!
But after my 2nd surf i'm hooked. Stable (once you get used to the 2 stage tippiness like my 12'6 JM raceboard) and surfed really smoothly. The waves were only 2 foot little runners but it went off the top nicely and was very forgiving.
I set it up as a quad but probably too long for a comp board so i'm keen to try the 8'9 (i'm 80kg)


Hey Robdog, thats awesome! I had a similar experience. These new boards are a whole new ball game and need to given a couple of surfs to dial in. Once dialed, the benefits of the new design become very clear.

Play with different fins as well. Every location and rider has different needs.
In bigger juicier waves try dropping in a bigger quad set like the Lopez.

Thanks for the feedback guys! Go rip!

AA

jrc22ski
53 posts
2 Oct 2011 9:04PM
Thumbs Up

AA said...

Radman said...

droped in a set of gerry lopez,quads into the 9'1' pro ,nice fins ,similar area to the jl kwad stock fins but the side fins have the innerfoil.seems to have quickend the board up and made it looser nice work futures


Hey Radman, keep playing. You will find the right combo for your conditions up there in Gerro. The stability of the HRippers is quite different to traditional flat bottom boards. To get the equivalent stability of the the JL Quad 9'1" X 30" you would need to go 31" wide in a Hull Ripper. However you will get used to it very quickly - they roll like a race board but don't go all the way.

robg1703 said...

HI AA,
I've just had 2 surfs on the new 9'6 Hull Ripper (normally ride a 8'9 l/weight ripper) and my first thoughts were that it reminded me of an Italian Supermodel or Sportscar.
Looks insane but too much going on and doesn't know what it's doing!
But after my 2nd surf i'm hooked. Stable (once you get used to the 2 stage tippiness like my 12'6 JM raceboard) and surfed really smoothly. The waves were only 2 foot little runners but it went off the top nicely and was very forgiving.
I set it up as a quad but probably too long for a comp board so i'm keen to try the 8'9 (i'm 80kg)


Hey Robdog, thats awesome! I had a similar experience. These new boards are a whole new ball game and need to given a couple of surfs to dial in. Once dialed, the benefits of the new design become very clear.

Play with different fins as well. Every location and rider has different needs.
In bigger juicier waves try dropping in a bigger quad set like the Lopez.

Thanks for the feedback guys! Go rip!

AA




Were you on the "WIDE" or "PRO" HR.

Thx!

jrc22ski
53 posts
2 Oct 2011 9:09PM
Thumbs Up

CB1 said...

AA, the US distributor website is saying to go 3 inches longer than you normally ride. I've also been told 6 inches longer. What have you heard?

Any inside scoop if they will be making them shorter than 8'9?



If possible, please provide weights of these boards. Thank you..

CB1
23 posts
2 Oct 2011 10:11PM
Thumbs Up

Unfortunately, there are no weights listed. AA will probably be the best source for that information.

The HR's in the US, were made with the wood veneer look, but they just posted that they just got some HR's like the ones shown in this thread.

Just for fun, found this video on their site. More scenic stuff, but pretty cool. Peter Trow is good behind the camera. Boards in the video are the PSH progressive series.

Radman
WA, 629 posts
3 Oct 2011 6:23PM
Thumbs Up

I have the pro certainly rips

jrc22ski
53 posts
5 Oct 2011 7:12PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
AA said...

Just received the Volumes for the Hull Ripper range

9'2” x 30 3/4” x 4 1/4” 9-2 Hull Ripper 126L
9'6” x 30 1/2” x 4 3/8” 9-6 Hull Ripper 139L
9'11” x 31” x 4 1/4” 9-11 Hull Ripper 142L


8'9” x 30 1/8” x 4 1/4” 8-9 Hull Ripper 119L
9'1” x 28 7/8” x 4 1/4” 9-1 Hull Ripper Pro 121L
9'6” x 28 7/8” x 4 1/4” 9-6 Hull Ripper Pro 127L

Keep in mind these new Hull shapes are a completely different animal's and as such these volumes don't really relate to the board you are riding now, other than a broad guide.

You need a bit of extra width and length to get the same feel of a flat bottomed board, yet they surf like a board much shorter and paddle like a short (wide) race board.

AA,

if possible, pls provide your thoughts on the glide/stability/surfing of the

8'9" vs 9'1" vs 9'6" PRO's for 75KG advanced rider.

Would also like to get an idea of the weights of the models above.

Any other rider input would be great too.

Thank you.

Radman
WA, 629 posts
5 Oct 2011 9:50PM
Thumbs Up

my 9'1' hull ripper pro weighs in at 10.8 kg with legrope ,g lopez qads and wet dek grip, i thought it felt more than that .i wonder what you could shave off it by sanding all the glossy paint off,wonder what colour s underneath, could look sic bit like a brushed carbon starboard only more stealth like

hilly
WA, 7294 posts
6 Oct 2011 8:12PM
Thumbs Up

Radman said...

my 9'1' hull ripper pro weighs in at 10.8 kg with legrope ,g lopez qads and wet dek grip, i thought it felt more than that .i wonder what you could shave off it by sanding all the glossy paint off,wonder what colour s underneath, could look sic bit like a brushed carbon starboard only more stealth like


You would shave off 200gms and it would look like bamboo with paint badly sanded off.

Radman
WA, 629 posts
7 Oct 2011 11:01PM
Thumbs Up

hilly said...

Radman said...

my 9'1' hull ripper pro weighs in at 10.8 kg with legrope ,g lopez qads and wet dek grip, i thought it felt more than that .i wonder what you could shave off it by sanding all the glossy paint off,wonder what colour s underneath, could look sic bit like a brushed carbon starboard only more stealth like


You would shave off 200gms and it would look like bamboo with paint badly sanded off.


that would look petty good me tinks

AA
NSW, 2159 posts
10 Oct 2011 10:50PM
Thumbs Up

I found this review on the Standup Zone (USA). Posting it here because it pretty much sums up the feedback we are getting so far.

Having paddled and surfed the HULL RIPPER almost daily for the past month in some really good East Coast waves, here are my impressions (for what its worth)..
1. Sizing....I'm a pretty big guy 210-215 lbs (95-97kg). Paddle regularly and got the 9'6" Wide Hull Ripper...30'1/8 inches wide. I have a 9'3" PSH/Wide Hand Glassed Custom Ripper that is just under 30 inches wide. I GLAD I WENT A LITTLE BIGGER on the HULL RIPPER. Its rails knife down (up) and are surprisingly thin...it's a lower volume design and the slightly larger size (recommended by Blueline/Santa Barbara) has worked out perfect!!
2. Stability...IT IS MORE TIPPY...I'm not an engineer but makes sense that thin rails, less volume has an effect. But, I found that with a little time I got used to this and as I got more comfortable on the board discovered the hull bottom works great and the board paddles fast for its size and paddles into waves incredibly well! Still, I would caution, THIS IS NOT A BEGINNERS BOARD ....
3. Fit and finish...I have the wood veneer....BEAUTIFUL!!
4. Wave performance....With time, AMAZING!...However, initially I wasn't sure. It rides different, definitely from the tail. It is not built for nose-riding or simply cruising...I fully agree with what I had read about it...IT IS A BOARD MEANT TO BE RIDDEN HARD....SURF IT FROM THE TAIL AND THE BOARD JUST FLIES....and with the thin rails...the RAIL TO RAIL TRANSITION IS INCREDIBLY FAST. Frankly, even after a month of great waves, I am still discovering the board's potential...and even at my age I can feel it making me a better surfer...

Bottom line..IT IS NOT A BOARD FOR EVERYBODY but seems built for high performance...As you get used to it you find that it surfs shorter than its length, paddles longer than its length ...and if you want to surf hard...it is a great choice...As I said in the earlier post...I'M STOKED!!
Tim

jrc22ski
53 posts
28 Oct 2011 10:30AM
Thumbs Up

It would be great to hear any updates on the PSH Hull Rippers as well as how the current models compare to each other in categories such as glide, stability, speed, good wave vs moderate wave performance.

For instance, does one size have a faster/flatter rocker providing more speed/stability while another a increased rocker providing better steep wave performance/less sped and stability.

I am an advanced SUP idea weighing 75kg's and trying to decide on the 9'2HR/126vol vs. the 9'6"Pro HR/127vol.

Thx in advance for any input.

hilly
WA, 7294 posts
28 Oct 2011 2:44PM
Thumbs Up

jrc22ski said...

It would be great to hear any updates on the PSH Hull Rippers as well as how the current models compare to each other in categories such as glide, stability, speed, good wave vs moderate wave performance.

For instance, does one size have a faster/flatter rocker providing more speed/stability while another a increased rocker providing better steep wave performance/less sped and stability.

I am an advanced SUP idea weighing 75kg's and trying to decide on the 9'2HR/126vol vs. the 9'6"Pro HR/127vol.

Thx in advance for any input.

Go the 9 2 at 105kg I can ride the 9 6 HR(not pro)

Demo the 8 6 ripper as well

Radman
WA, 629 posts
13 Nov 2011 1:33PM
Thumbs Up

couple of piccs of the 9'1' hr pro on a recent visit to the islands



every thing in red looks good at the islands

Piros
QLD, 6964 posts
13 Nov 2011 8:08PM
Thumbs Up

CB1 that was a fantastic video props to those guys in the cold water.

Done about 30 odd hours on the Hull Rippers on 3 different boards here is my review. All the reviews are in small to medium waves 10 -20 knots of wind in moderate to sh!tty conditions , sorry haven't had good waves for ages.

Boards :- 8-9 HR wide , 9-1 HR Pro & 9-2 HR wide Carbon. Three extremely different boards I'm 6ft & 90 kgs and the review is absed on my size , weight and ability (advanced kook). All boards were set up with same Quad fins , Pancho fronts & controller rears ,(tried the 9-1 as a 2+1) the V bottom on the Hull rippers adds apx 4 to 5 degrees to the fin cant so be prepared to try different fins as the ole faithful set may not work on these boards. I've done the hard work and trust me this is the set up.I still run the Jamie Mitchell thruster set on my std Rippers.

9-1 HR Pro:- Done most of my time on the 9-1 pro , beautiful looking board with a great outline. I have always ridden sub 9-0 narrow boards around 28 wide and coming from my 8-11 Ripper this was my initial pick from the HR's and it was about 1/2 kg heavier than the 8-11 Ripper , float wise no problems balance wise it's tough for my size. Very tricky in the chop (smooth water no worries) you need to keep your feet away from the edges when paddling and stand in slight surfer stance. You also need to understand about the boards Hull design , it rocks like a boat with the curved bottom so you need to move with it if you stiffen up it's not long before you get leg burn but you do get used to it.

On the wave it was great and very easy to turn dropping onto to it's rail with good speed and very easy to do re-entries , you can turn the board from the middle and not get back on it but this will make the board do some strange things , these boards are meant to be driven and not ridden if you get my point. In the foam or running around sections the board seems to lift up and run over the foam balls (very good). Overall good board but after a couple of hours you really feel it in the legs and it does affect your surfing.This board is really for advanced riders at my weight or intermediates 10 kegs less.This board would be insane on a glassy 4 to 5 foot day.

8-9 HR wide:- Not a fan of wide boards I jumped on this and went "Wow how stable is this" , heaps of float the wind was blowing it's guts out and still no problem.Similar weight to the 9-1 Pro HR , first wave was a classic surfing in a rip caught a little 2 to 3 footer and then it jacked to 4ft on the reef , a free fall on my first wave landed and turned in the same movement back to the top to a cutback back and away I went , amazing board had a great 2 hours session it . Great paddle speed for it's size and very easy to throw around , the extra width did not affect performance in fact I improved on it as I was more stable and focused on my turns , like the 9-1 it could be turned from the middle but you will get caught out , you need to move your feet and drive this board.This board will suit intermediate to advanced riders at my weight or intermediates 5 kegs less.

9-2 HR Carbon Wide:- Unwrapped this baby and it looked big & wide nothing like I would ever ride.It still had a nice outline better than the 8-9 HR wide the extra length gave it's nice shape.The big surprise was when I picked it up apx 1kg lighter than the others and lighter than my 8-11 ripper with all that extra foam.These carbon boards are a completely different build and it does come at an extra cost. My first surf was in absolute sh!t conditions 15 to 20 knot N.E which on the Gold Coast is stay home and drink wind.It's had tons of float as I paddled out through the crap struggling and thinking this is a complete waste of time , after about 10 mins I managed to scramble onto a wave tried to turn and went flat on my face (total kook effort) I put it down to the chop and tried again almost did the same again and surfed it out still looking like a kook. Next wave dropped the back foot onto the stomp pad and this board turned like something half it size with speed and I was off that's all it took .I rode this board a bit more mal style and just loved it , get that foot back and push and it just accelerates , even in the absolute crap conditions I could push this around and over sections.

I went out again this morning in much nicer conditions with a hang over as it was still blowing N.E and the surf was still pretty small .Wave after wave bottom turn pump pump , R.E , cut back ,R.E I couldn't do a thing wrong , if you look at it , it's a big board but surfs like grommet rocket pocket .I have definitely changed my opinion on bigger wider boards. You just have to learn to move your feet to surf these Hull Rippers.Don't get caught mid board this is where it will throw you , in the end I was doing cross step cutbacks with ease. If I had to choose one from the three than this is it . A board for all conditions , just love it.This board will most riders intermediate to advanced up to almost a 100 kegs.

These are a couple of videos showing the 9-1 HR pro (have now changed fin set up) in the first one and there is some of me on the 8-9 HR wide in the second one , sorry none of the 9-2 HR wide.

Rob



jrc22ski
53 posts
17 Nov 2011 7:52PM
Thumbs Up

Piros said...


Boards :- 8-9 HR wide , 9-1 HR Pro & 9-2 HR wide Carbon. Three extremely different boards I'm 6ft & 90 kgs and the review is absed on my size , weight and ability (advanced kook). All boards were set up with same Quad fins , Pancho fronts & controller rears ,(tried the 9-1 as a 2+1) the V bottom on the Hull rippers adds apx 4 to 5 degrees to the fin cant so be prepared to try different fins as the ole faithful set may not work on these boards. I've done the hard work and trust me this is the set up.I still run the Jamie Mitchell thruster set on my std Rippers.

9-1 HR Pro:- Done most of my time on the 9-1 pro , beautiful looking board with a great outline. I have always ridden sub 9-0 narrow boards around 28 wide and coming from my 8-11 Ripper this was my initial pick from the HR's and it was about 1/2 kg heavier than the 8-11 Ripper , float wise no problems balance wise it's tough for my size. Very tricky in the chop (smooth water no worries) you need to keep your feet away from the edges when paddling and stand in slight surfer stance. You also need to understand about the boards Hull design , it rocks like a boat with the curved bottom so you need to move with it if you stiffen up it's not long before you get leg burn but you do get used to it.

On the wave it was great and very easy to turn dropping onto to it's rail with good speed and very easy to do re-entries , you can turn the board from the middle and not get back on it but this will make the board do some strange things , these boards are meant to be driven and not ridden if you get my point. In the foam or running around sections the board seems to lift up and run over the foam balls (very good). Overall good board but after a couple of hours you really feel it in the legs and it does affect your surfing.This board is really for advanced riders at my weight or intermediates 10 kegs less.This board would be insane on a glassy 4 to 5 foot day.

8-9 HR wide:- Not a fan of wide boards I jumped on this and went "Wow how stable is this" , heaps of float the wind was blowing it's guts out and still no problem.Similar weight to the 9-1 Pro HR , first wave was a classic surfing in a rip caught a little 2 to 3 footer and then it jacked to 4ft on the reef , a free fall on my first wave landed and turned in the same movement back to the top to a cutback back and away I went , amazing board had a great 2 hours session it . Great paddle speed for it's size and very easy to throw around , the extra width did not affect performance in fact I improved on it as I was more stable and focused on my turns , like the 9-1 it could be turned from the middle but you will get caught out , you need to move your feet and drive this board.This board will suit intermediate to advanced riders at my weight or intermediates 5 kegs less.

9-2 HR Carbon Wide:- Unwrapped this baby and it looked big & wide nothing like I would ever ride.It still had a nice outline better than the 8-9 HR wide the extra length gave it's nice shape.The big surprise was when I picked it up apx 1kg lighter than the others and lighter than my 8-11 ripper with all that extra foam.These carbon boards are a completely different build and it does come at an extra cost. My first surf was in absolute sh!t conditions 15 to 20 knot N.E which on the Gold Coast is stay home and drink wind.It's had tons of float as I paddled out through the crap struggling and thinking this is a complete waste of time , after about 10 mins I managed to scramble onto a wave tried to turn and went flat on my face (total kook effort) I put it down to the chop and tried again almost did the same again and surfed it out still looking like a kook. Next wave dropped the back foot onto the stomp pad and this board turned like something half it size with speed and I was off that's all it took .I rode this board a bit more mal style and just loved it , get that foot back and push and it just accelerates , even in the absolute crap conditions I could push this around and over sections.

I went out again this morning in much nicer conditions with a hang over as it was still blowing N.E and the surf was still pretty small .Wave after wave bottom turn pump pump , R.E , cut back ,R.E I couldn't do a thing wrong , if you look at it , it's a big board but surfs like grommet rocket pocket .I have definitely changed my opinion on bigger wider boards. You just have to learn to move your feet to surf these Hull Rippers.Don't get caught mid board this is where it will throw you , in the end I was doing cross step cutbacks with ease. If I had to choose one from the three than this is it . A board for all conditions , just love it.This board will most riders intermediate to advanced up to almost a 100 kegs.

These are a couple of videos showing the 9-1 HR pro (have now changed fin set up) in the first one and there is some of me on the 8-9 HR wide in the second one , sorry none of the 9-2 HR wide.

Rob






Piros,

great info...thx.

At 5'10"/75kg's I am still debating over HR's in 8'9" / 9'1" / 9'2" and 9'6". I am advanced SUP'r in windy E Coast US conditions so stability is sometimes critical.

Glide is also important as some of our breaks are low angle/gutless waves and are a paddle to get to.

I currently ride an older custom PSH 10' Ripper.

Any perspective on appropriate board appreciated.

Also. On a percentage basis, what is the premium in price on the carbon vs standard construction?

Thx

Piros
QLD, 6964 posts
19 Nov 2011 6:54PM
Thumbs Up



At your size and weight you could ride any of these Hull Rippers 8'9"wide / 9'1"pro / 9'2"wide. Glide wise the 9-1 is definitely the quickest. I think you would find the 9-6 a bit too big for you , the 9-6 wide is a lot of board .You pay around an extra $120 for the carbon board , well work it in my books as the boards come in around a 1kg lighter. Coming from the 10-0 ripper you would probably most comfortable on the 9-2 wide HR (it's still a pretty big board) but definitely have a try with 9-1 pro and if you are comfortable on it , that's your board.

jrc22ski
53 posts
20 Nov 2011 1:35AM
Thumbs Up

Piros - thx!

I wouldn't consider the 9'6" wide however, is the 9'6" pro worth considering as well.

Good info on the carbon too.

-john



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Stand Up Paddle   Board Talk & Reviews


"psh hull rippers" started by Radman