Forums > Stand Up Paddle General

Which SUP

Reply
Created by cranky > 9 months ago, 23 Jun 2008
cranky
440 posts
23 Jun 2008 3:35PM
Thumbs Up

Reading this forum has raised my interest in SUP, I have been following the discussions for a while but the more I read the more indecisive I get.

I'm 74 kg, I want the kids and the missus to be able to use it, but I don't want to totally exclude myself from being able to use it in waves. We all had a paddle ( flat water) on a JL 10'8? x30 and totally enjoyed it and no problems with 2 of us paddling around on it.

Any opinions? help me make a decision.

crankster

P co
WA, 457 posts
23 Jun 2008 3:39PM
Thumbs Up

Check out the 10'6" Naish and the 11' Watercooled. Both great for your weight and good wave machines.

DavidJohn
VIC, 17438 posts
23 Jun 2008 6:21PM
Thumbs Up

cranky said...

Reading this forum has raised my interest in SUP, I have been following the discussions for a while but the more I read the more indecisive I get.

I'm 74 kg, I want the kids and the missus to be able to use it, but I don't want to totally exclude myself from being able to use it in waves. We all had a paddle ( flat water) on a JL 10'8? x30 and totally enjoyed it and no problems with 2 of us paddling around on it.

Any opinions? help me make a decision.

crankster


If you want to have the kids on it and also for the wife I'd give the 10'6" Naish a miss and defiantly go for the bigger 11'6"..or even the new 11'4".

You can paddle it with the kids sitting on the front and is also much better for your wife to learn on.

The bigger Starboards and also the Kalama would also be a good choice..Even the 11' x 30" NSP.

btw..I hope to test this new NSP soon for its floatieness and stability..I'll post a report.

DJ

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
23 Jun 2008 6:27PM
Thumbs Up

I too have had the same problem with making the decision. I had a paddle on a 9'8 StarBoard and was comfortable with the balance aspect on that, but have decided the 11'2" StarBoard looks like the way to go, as I want it for both flat water and surf use.

I am 85Kg and it seems that this board will suit me for longer than say the 11'6 Naish, which while being an excellent board, may get too big very quickly.

My other consideration is that I want to be able to sail it as well, and I have been told today that the 11'2 has this option.

Finally decision made, now I just have to convince the financial controller that it is a good time to buy :)

DavidJohn
VIC, 17438 posts
23 Jun 2008 7:15PM
Thumbs Up

aus301 said...

I too have had the same problem with making the decision. I had a paddle on a 9'8 StarBoard and was comfortable with the balance aspect on that, but have decided the 11'2" StarBoard looks like the way to go, as I want it for both flat water and surf use.

I am 85Kg and it seems that this board will suit me for longer than say the 11'6 Naish, which while being an excellent board, may get too big very quickly.

My other consideration is that I want to be able to sail it as well, and I have been told today that the 11'2 has this option.

Finally decision made, now I just have to convince the financial controller that it is a good time to buy :)


The SB 11'2" sounds like the perfect choice for you.

Remember that sometimes it's easier to beg for forgiveness than it is to ask for permition..

DJ

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
23 Jun 2008 7:18PM
Thumbs Up

DavidJohn said...

Remember that sometimes it's easier to beg for forgiveness than it is to ask for permition..




Yeah I have heard that, unfortunately so has she, and it's too bloody cold to sleep with the dog this time of year

cranky
440 posts
23 Jun 2008 5:25PM
Thumbs Up

Thanks , should I stick to 30 wide on whatever I decide on?

DavidJohn
VIC, 17438 posts
23 Jun 2008 10:49PM
Thumbs Up

cranky said...

Thanks , should I stick to 30 wide on whatever I decide on?


Yeah..I reckon..

DJ

WINDY MILLER
WA, 3183 posts
23 Jun 2008 9:32PM
Thumbs Up

30 is a great width, very stable for learners and good if u wanna chuck the kids on...

the advantage of goinig narrower n than 30 is that it will surf better, easier to swap from rail to rail, should also go better in bigger waves..


if u want an all rounder i think at your weight u should look at something like sb 11'2 u might find the naish 11'6 too big .......

the JL's are fantastic boards, but due to there immaculate slick finish there not as sturdy as other boards i.e chipping and scratches.... could be a prob with kids!





Greenroom
WA, 7608 posts
23 Jun 2008 11:32PM
Thumbs Up

The JL's have a super gloss finish and the last thing Id wanna do, if I had one, would be to put wax on it for the kids.
Im not sure if you can get JL's with the full deck pad, but once again why would you wanna spoil the nice look finish.
Kinda like having a Naish and covering it with a full deck pad.
I reckon the Naish and the Starboard sport tech boards are by far the best looking SUPs around. The Naish has the wood with bright yellow rails and the Starboard has the wood with the bright red rails... mmm I want them.
But back to the topic... me having an 11'2 Id say that this board is the way to go.
It has the full deck pad. It glides and floats very well on flat water being 190L. Although I am a feather weight at 65kgs. Ive had both my kids on the nose of it and it still paddles well. It picks up waves that are ankle high to rolling swells. It surfs just like a longboard.
BUT the thing I have been noticing lately is that it does lack in rocker. I wish it had more. Ive been taking it out in head high waves and when it gets sucky and steep, the nose just wants to bury itself at the bottom of the wave, unless you really stomp back on the tail, which tends to make you lose alot of your speed before the bottom turn. To avoid this you really have to take off on an angle to the wave to dig and trim the inside rail into the face of the wave
Enough blab from me...
Good luck choosing

SF
NSW, 161 posts
24 Jun 2008 1:51AM
Thumbs Up

There is a JL 11' x 30" all around which has a wide square tail, is this the board you tried? If it is, it has the reputation of being a good stable board to start out on. You can always put rail savers on to stop the chipping.

The Starboard 11' 2" would certainly be worth looking at, the all over deck pad is a great option for a family board, the price is excellent and there are plenty of people on this forum who will swear to its surfing capabilities.

The Naish has great construction, lightweight and robust, my 11' 6" has taken quite a beating. I think the 10' 6" is too narrow for a family board. The 11' 6" is a good family board, great for tandem, ok to start out in the surf, but might be too big for you as you improve.

Choppy water is much harder to paddle on than flat water so don't get too small to start. Have fun, I am sure there are a number of good choices.

Steve

Jord
WA, 107 posts
24 Jun 2008 1:11AM
Thumbs Up

cant go past the laird hammilton range,
unlike the naish and SB wich are both great boards too, its alot thinner and built for the waves, its also lighter, so easier for the kids to drag around, and the sizes vary, the 10'6 is 27" (i think)wide wich is pleanty and perfect for waves, and the tail also is thinner there for less volume, and that makes it easy to get those tight turns on the waves.

the naish 11'6 is also great but its a bit slow, but you could probaly improve this with different fins, etc.
the SB i havent used one but the look nice

eric344
138 posts
24 Jun 2008 9:51AM
Thumbs Up

Jord said...

cant go past the laird hammilton range,
unlike the naish and SB wich are both great boards too, its alot thinner and built for the waves, its also lighter, so easier for the kids to drag around, and the sizes vary, the 10'6 is 27" (i think)wide wich is pleanty and perfect for waves, and the tail also is thinner there for less volume, and that makes it easy to get those tight turns on the waves.

the naish 11'6 is also great but its a bit slow, but you could probaly improve this with different fins, etc.
the SB i havent used one but the look nice




You're wrong with the dimensions Jordan !

But in some ways, I agree with you, before to purchase a board taking a look at the Lairds and other Surftech SUPs (www.surftech.com) is a good idea ; Lairds range now counts with 4 boards (10'/27" ; 11'/27", 11,6'/29" and 12,1'/31") and they recently added new models from shapers like Robert August or Hawaiian Pro Design.

In your case Cranky, a SB 11'2, JL 10'8 and Laird 11'6 will do the job ; your wife and kids will probably love the full deck pad of the SB and Laird (softop version)

I would recommend a Naish 11'6, Laird 12'1, SB 12'6 and other big boards for bigger guys.
a Naish 10'6 or a Laird 11' will have higher performance in the waves, they keep nice cruising ability for your 74kg, but you'll probably struggle a bit when it gets choppy until you get a bit of practice.
If you want to windsurf your board, then also check the new mistral pacifico wave

you can also check the website www.kenalu.com to get more info about boards and paddles

cranky
440 posts
24 Jun 2008 2:35PM
Thumbs Up

Thanks for all the good info, the sb 11'2 sounds a popular choice, and the full deck grip would be usefull to us. What sort of money would I expect to pay for the sb 11'2? and does that come with a paddle?

I had a look at the mistral and the naish but honestly after a while they all blend in together, way to much choice for me.

akhawk
WA, 1085 posts
24 Jun 2008 3:24PM
Thumbs Up

I don't know how much the starboard 11'2'' goes for new but they don't come with a paddle.
I bought a cheapie for $50 which gets me on the water and has been fine. I've never paddled a carbon one so don't really know what i'm missing.

cranky
440 posts
24 Jun 2008 5:10PM
Thumbs Up

With the starboard range how much real difference/ advantage or other is there between the sport tech and the tufskin?

SF
NSW, 161 posts
24 Jun 2008 11:12PM
Thumbs Up

Sport tech is a few hundred grams lighter, only 2/3 deckpad and $250 extra.
Tufskin is more robust, full deckpad and best choice for family.

Brooko
1672 posts
25 Jun 2008 6:05PM
Thumbs Up

Greenroom said...Hey greeny how is it mate ! whats this 190l mean, and what does it have to do with standup paddle surfing? cheers mate!

The JL's have a super gloss finish and the last thing Id wanna do, if I had one, would be to put wax on it for the kids.
Im not sure if you can get JL's with the full deck pad, but once again why would you wanna spoil the nice look finish.
Kinda like having a Naish and covering it with a full deck pad.
I reckon the Naish and the Starboard sport tech boards are by far the best looking SUPs around. The Naish has the wood with bright yellow rails and the Starboard has the wood with the bright red rails... mmm I want them.
But back to the topic... me having an 11'2 Id say that this board is the way to go.
It has the full deck pad. It glides and floats very well on flat water being 190L. Although I am a feather weight at 65kgs. Ive had both my kids on the nose of it and it still paddles well. It picks up waves that are ankle high to rolling swells. It surfs just like a longboard.
BUT the thing I have been noticing lately is that it does lack in rocker. I wish it had more. Ive been taking it out in head high waves and when it gets sucky and steep, the nose just wants to bury itself at the bottom of the wave, unless you really stomp back on the tail, which tends to make you lose alot of your speed before the bottom turn. To avoid this you really have to take off on an angle to the wave to dig and trim the inside rail into the face of the wave
Enough blab from me...
Good luck choosing


Ben dover
QLD, 504 posts
25 Jun 2008 8:25PM
Thumbs Up

Alot of shapers use litres to when designing the boards.

I know that most boards around the 9'6 range have about 140 litres

uk
198 posts
26 Jun 2008 6:06AM
Thumbs Up

the use of litres is a measurment of the boards volume by means of the amount
of water it displaces when fully submerged in water.one litre of volume is capable of floating one kilo of mass, so this can be used to give an indication of the boards suitability for use with your weight.As greenroom says 190L floats him
at 65k very well,I weigh 65k(prob 70K with wetsuit) and own a 125L which floats well, Ive even stood on a 100L but most of the board was under water.
Dont know where im going with this now but thought id just try to help.

Brooko
1672 posts
26 Jun 2008 11:34AM
Thumbs Up

Dont really know about this litre stuff sounds a bit crazy, sounds like some rainwater tank your trying to fill with water keep it simple like surfing it might be a 6 4" x 18" x 2 1/4 . Which would not float a 100kg person a surfer would know this by looking at it. A 100kg person might want a 6 4" x 19.5 x 2 1/2. Litres sounds weird, like how many litres of beer did you consume last night.

Ben dover
QLD, 504 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:03PM
Thumbs Up

Brooko said...

Dont really know about this litre stuff sounds a bit crazy, sounds like some rainwater tank your trying to fill with water keep it simple like surfing it might be a 6 4" x 18" x 2 1/4 . Which would not float a 100kg person a surfer would know this by looking at it. A 100kg person might want a 6 4" x 19.5 x 2 1/2. Litres sounds weird, like how many litres of beer did you consume last night.


Well if u go by litres u know how many beers are in ur board.

Well the program im using to design my board tells me

DavidJohn
VIC, 17438 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:09PM
Thumbs Up

Us cool windsurfing dudes know all about liters.. ...It's the first thing that's relevant to board size..and even more important than length and width.

Check out my mate JP's site.. .. http://www.jp-australia.com/2008/index.php?id=38 ..Hey Brooko..Play the little vid while you're at it..

I think when boards started going wider the length thing became irrelivent..and liters is the only real way to measure a boards size.(in terms of floatation)

DJ

ChrisMcC
NSW, 667 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:15PM
Thumbs Up

does the litreage get effected if you drink bourbon as opposed to beer???

aus301
QLD, 2039 posts
26 Jun 2008 3:36PM
Thumbs Up

DavidJohn said...

and even more important than length and width.


For windsurfing, I would have said that was true a few years ago DJ, but now the width is so important that a number of maufacturers actually name the different size boards by (I have a manta 67 for instance, 67cms wide). This is however not always the case with wave boards and more comon in race gear.

The width of this board will beat a 60cm board with say 10l more volume onto the plane, but when slogging you do sit lower in the water. I guess what I am saying is that it is all improtant, and the perfect size of the craft is all about all the measurements. No one will totally out weigh the other.

Ben dover
QLD, 504 posts
26 Jun 2008 6:33PM
Thumbs Up

Just Wrong said...

does the litreage get effected if you drink bourbon as opposed to beer???


Yer ur board will cost more at the cost of bourbon these days...

Brooko
1672 posts
26 Jun 2008 6:13PM
Thumbs Up

Just Wrong said...

does the litreage get effected if you drink bourbon as opposed to beer???


Haha well at least with bourbon you dont normally need as much as beer to get the same effect

Greenroom
WA, 7608 posts
26 Jun 2008 9:43PM
Thumbs Up

Brooko said...

Dont really know about this litre stuff sounds a bit crazy, sounds like some rainwater tank your trying to fill with water keep it simple like surfing it might be a 6 4" x 18" x 2 1/4 . Which would not float a 100kg person a surfer would know this by looking at it. A 100kg person might want a 6 4" x 19.5 x 2 1/2. Litres sounds weird, like how many litres of beer did you consume last night.

Ahuh thats right I forgot you were a closed minded surfer
Go on Brooko mate you know you want to
And to answer your question... er um the Starboard 11'2 is 190L in volume

uk
198 posts
26 Jun 2008 10:34PM
Thumbs Up

[b]Brooko said...[/ A 100kg person might want a 6 4" x 19.5 x 2 1/2. Litres sounds weird, like how many litres of beer did you consume last night.


Fair comment but a 100kg person could not float stood up on this size board cos its not got enough volume(measured in litres).BTW had two cans last night 500ml each so i guess 1 litre.

SF
NSW, 161 posts
27 Jun 2008 12:59AM
Thumbs Up

Interesting the difference a little volume makes. I have paddled the 9' and the 9'8" Starboards. I weigh 100kg and when I tried to paddle the 9' (135 litres) I found it unstable fore and aft as well as sideways and kept falling in. When I paddled the 9'8" (155 litres) l was a little wobbly to start but I felt good enough to take it into the surf and had a great time on it even though I fell in a lot more than I would have on my 230 litre Naish 11'6".

Steve

Brooko
1672 posts
27 Jun 2008 5:35PM
Thumbs Up

uk said...

[b]Brooko said...[/ A 100kg person might want a 6 4" x 19.5 x 2 1/2. Litres sounds weird, like how many litres of beer did you consume last night.


Fair comment but a 100kg person could not float stood up on this size board cos its not got enough volume(measured in litres).BTW had two cans last night 500ml each so i guess 1 litre.


You guys get it easy in the uk our cans of the local beer are only 375ml



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Stand Up Paddle General


"Which SUP" started by cranky