Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

KA sails -what sort of mast?

Reply
Created by lordhowe > 9 months ago, 19 Nov 2008
ka72
QLD, 580 posts
2 Dec 2008 8:24PM
Thumbs Up

Crazyjockey- I have a 2008 6.6 Koyote (which I have used heaps)that I have only ever rigged on a 430 RDM (Ezzy brand) and it works really well.

In fact I first rigged the sail on my old 430 SDM (Tushingham brand mast) and it didn't seem to rig well at all. So I tried it with the RDM and it rigged up perfectly. It certainly doesn't flatten out the sail or have any effect on the speed, as sailquik said much of the shape in this sail is determined by the seam shaping.
I also think it feels lighter and much more dynamic on the RDM and would recommend (my preference anyway) the RDM's for the 6.6m size and down of the Koyotes.

Arnold
46 posts
2 Dec 2008 8:24PM
Thumbs Up

mathew said...

Arnold said...
GazMan, any sail that has not been put together by an insane chimpanzee would perform better IMHO.


seems to be not so humble... since we as a species evolved from them, that would put every brand at a disadvantage.

If there is something specific you dont like about KA as a brand, build quality, sail performance, etc, how about you just say so.


Mathew, correct me if I am wrong, although they may be our closest primate relative I don't think it is technically correct to say we (humans) evolved from the chimpanzee, I think we only share a common ancestor with the chimpanzee; and from this common ancestor came 'Homo whatever' and humans evolved, and also from this common ancestor came chimpanzee from which Mathew evolved

FormulaNova
WA, 14808 posts
2 Dec 2008 9:07PM
Thumbs Up

Arnold said...

mathew said...

Arnold said...
GazMan, any sail that has not been put together by an insane chimpanzee would perform better IMHO.


seems to be not so humble... since we as a species evolved from them, that would put every brand at a disadvantage.

If there is something specific you dont like about KA as a brand, build quality, sail performance, etc, how about you just say so.


Mathew, correct me if I am wrong, although they may be our closest primate relative I don't think it is technically correct to say we (humans) evolved from the chimpanzee, I think we only share a common ancestor with the chimpanzee; and from this common ancestor came 'Homo whatever' and humans evolved, and also from this common ancestor came chimpanzee from which Mathew evolved



Yeah, so you answered some silly point about evolution, now how about your excellent discussion of the failings of KA sails versus whatever you happen to use?


kato
VIC, 3407 posts
2 Dec 2008 11:49PM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...

Arnold said...

mathew said...

Arnold said...
GazMan, any sail that has not been put together by an insane chimpanzee would perform better IMHO.


seems to be not so humble... since we as a species evolved from them, that would put every brand at a disadvantage.

If there is something specific you dont like about KA as a brand, build quality, sail performance, etc, how about you just say so.


Mathew, correct me if I am wrong, although they may be our closest primate relative I don't think it is technically correct to say we (humans) evolved from the chimpanzee, I think we only share a common ancestor with the chimpanzee; and from this common ancestor came 'Homo whatever' and humans evolved, and also from this common ancestor came chimpanzee from which Mathew evolved



Yeah, so you answered some silly point about evolution, now how about your excellent discussion of the failings of KA sails versus whatever you happen to use?





I agree,whats your problem ?????? Rational argurment please Not just cos x brand is crap

sailquik
VIC, 6094 posts
3 Dec 2008 1:05AM
Thumbs Up

Don't feed the Troll.......

GazMan
WA, 842 posts
3 Dec 2008 12:46AM
Thumbs Up

I think this topic has nearly reached it's expiry date!

Hey lordhowe, have you been tuning in to the 'relevant' replies to your original post re masts for KA sails? (haven't heard from you for a while)

lordhowe
NSW, 209 posts
3 Dec 2008 12:00PM
Thumbs Up

gazman, yep have taken the relevant points. The sail sounds like a good one, I'm still just a little reticent about mast compatability. I thought the 5.3 Koyote required a 400, but you say you're setting it on an X6 430, so not only is it on a different mast but also different IMCS. 21 instead of 19. If it's working I suppose it is a great advertisement for the sail, that it is still performing when set with these different bits. As for Arnold's comments, they haven't helped a lot.....

dieseagull
NSW, 167 posts
3 Dec 2008 2:13PM
Thumbs Up

ka72 said...

Crazyjockey- I have a 2008 6.6 Koyote (which I have used heaps)that I have only ever rigged on a 430 RDM (Ezzy brand) and it works really well.

In fact I first rigged the sail on my old 430 SDM (Tushingham brand mast) and it didn't seem to rig well at all. So I tried it with the RDM and it rigged up perfectly. It certainly doesn't flatten out the sail or have any effect on the speed, as sailquik said much of the shape in this sail is determined by the seam shaping.
I also think it feels lighter and much more dynamic on the RDM and would recommend (my preference anyway) the RDM's for the 6.6m size and down of the Koyotes.


Thanks for that info KA72, appreciate it.

Gazman, you're using a 5.3 on a 430 RDM? I was thinking about getting the 2009 Koyote 5.0 to use in stronger winds, it'd be wicked if I could rig it on the same mast!

mr love
VIC, 2358 posts
3 Dec 2008 3:18PM
Thumbs Up

Crazyjockey, I run my 08 5.3 on a Powerex 425 RDM ( chopped 50mm off the tip a few years ago to fit a Severne Blade)
The sail sets and performs just fine on the 430, maybe a bees d..k flat in the bottom caused by the Powerex bend curve. I can,t notice any difference though and it is a favorite sail, love it.
One thing to note is that the 08 sail had an adjustable head and would rig on a 430. The 09 Spec on the website has the 5.3 with a fixed head. If this is correct it won't rig on a 430 so I need to confirm with Andrew. I suspect the website is wrong, but just hold off until I can confirm 100%
Also note there is no Koyote 5.0, 5.3 is the smallest.
Seeya Martin

GazMan
WA, 842 posts
3 Dec 2008 4:27PM
Thumbs Up

mr love said...

Crazyjockey, I run my 08 5.3 on a Powerex 425 RDM ( chopped 50mm off the tip a few years ago to fit a Severne Blade)
The sail sets and performs just fine on the 430, maybe a bees d..k flat in the bottom caused by the Powerex bend curve. I can,t notice any difference though and it is a favorite sail, love it.
One thing to note is that the 08 sail had an adjustable head and would rig on a 430. The 09 Spec on the website has the 5.3 with a fixed head. If this is correct it won't rig on a 430 so I need to confirm with Andrew. I suspect the website is wrong, but just hold off until I can confirm 100%
Also note there is no Koyote 5.0, 5.3 is the smallest.
Seeya Martin


Many thanks Martin (mr love) for making the issue of mast compatibility much clearer (as you did many times over with me before I became the proud owner of a 5.3 Koyote!).

I've also shortened my 430 X6 mast but only to 427cm which would still be too long in a 5.3 Koyote with a fixed head. mr love did also mention to me before I got the Koyote that his 5.3 appeared to rig a touch flat in the bottom because of the Powerex (RDM) bend curve. This doesn't appear to be an issue when rigged on my 430 X6 (SDM) mast as there is certainly plenty of curve/fullness down low in the sail. I can post some photos of the 5.3 rigged on my X6 if it helps at all.

Also, the website specs for the 08 5.3 Koyote mentioned a fixed head (as did the specs for the 09 Koyote) but my 08 5.3 came with an adjustable head. If you end up getting a 5.3 Koyote without it then will only cost around $35 to get one fitted which I think is well worth it considering the brilliant performance and durability of this sail (I got an adjustable head fitted to a 4.5 Combat not long ago in Perth).

When I popped the question of compatibility of my NP 430 X6 mast with the 08 5.3, 5.9 & 6.6 Koyotes via email to KA designer Andrew McDougall, his reply was:

The (08) 5.3 has a fixed head. We did this as putting it on IMCS 21 would compromise it.

The NP (X6 430) mast will be fine.


Worth pointing out here that according to Boards mag mast test article, not all 430cm IMCS 21 masts are exactly IMCS 21:



Same inconsistencies with 400cm IMCS 19 masts according to Boards test article:

dieseagull
NSW, 167 posts
3 Dec 2008 6:35PM
Thumbs Up

Cool thanks for that Martin.

I think I was looking at the Koncept page when I made the comment about the 5.0.

I'll wait to hear about the adjustable head before I make up my mind.

Thanks for the offer to post the photos GazMan, but I won't trouble you. Could you tell me though, when you are rigging your 5.3 on the 430 how much extension do you need on the bottom, and how much do you adjust the head on the top?

GazMan
WA, 842 posts
3 Dec 2008 4:44PM
Thumbs Up

crazyjockey said...

Gazman, you're using a 5.3 on a 430 RDM? I was thinking about getting the 2009 Koyote 5.0 to use in stronger winds, it'd be wicked if I could rig it on the same mast!


No, I'm using a Pryde 430 X6 SDM (std diameter mast).

mr love
VIC, 2358 posts
4 Dec 2008 1:40PM
Thumbs Up

There is "za gut news und za bad news" re the 09 Koyote 5.3

The good news is that an adjustable head is not a problem as the first shipment of 5.3's is sold out and more need to be built. So a 430 mast will not be an issue.

The bad news is the first shipment of 09 5.3's is sold out and more need to be built. Need to confirm timing .

Thanks Martin

GazMan
WA, 842 posts
4 Dec 2008 9:24PM
Thumbs Up

crazyjockey said...

Cool thanks for that Martin.

I think I was looking at the Koncept page when I made the comment about the 5.0.

I'll wait to hear about the adjustable head before I make up my mind.

Thanks for the offer to post the photos GazMan, but I won't trouble you. Could you tell me though, when you are rigging your 5.3 on the 430 how much extension do you need on the bottom, and how much do you adjust the head on the top?




X6 mast cut to 427 cm (to suit previous sail), adjustable head cap pulled down as low as it will go with no base extension (using Chinook SDM mast extension). With my usual downhaul setting, there is about 3cm left below sail pulley for additional downhaul if required.

As I mentioned in a previous post, the boom cut-out on the 08 5.3 Koyote appears to be a bit low so if you're taller than me (I'm 178cms) and rig you boom at shoulder level then you may need to use some base extension to get the boom cut-out higher on the mast. I always rig my boom half-way between chest and shoulder height and I can't go much higher without using some base extension which would obviously lift the foot of the sail higher off the deck (just checked my markings on mast: top of boom cut-out measures approx 134cm from bottom end of mast whilst the boom centreline when rigged is usually 127cm from bottom of mast).

GazMan
WA, 842 posts
4 Dec 2008 9:49PM
Thumbs Up

Hey Martin (aka mr love),

do you know if the boom cut-out on the 09 Koyotes has been modified?

evlPanda
NSW, 9202 posts
17 Dec 2008 7:03PM
Thumbs Up

I also have the Boards mag article, or similar, that led me to a
North Gold SDM 460
for a
7.2 08 Koyote.

Again the "upper end of constant curve". Sail fits a lot better then the NP X3 460.

I have a question though. On my older KA Kult, ~2003, the outhaul can be adjusted by the batten's position on the mast. The batten just above the boom.

How do you rig your Koyotes?

I've found minimum outhaul seems to be quite similar to old Kult, the batten above the boom about half way across the mast. Max is... whatever is required really, pretty hard to completely flatten out/haven't experimented too much with max outhaul.

For downhaul I look at the tension crease between the 2nd and 3rd batten. Between 1/4 and 3/4 of way across sail.

FormulaNova
WA, 14808 posts
23 Dec 2008 4:49PM
Thumbs Up

I just thought I'd share some photos of my KA sails (Koncepts) rigged on some Neil Pryde-like masts. I say 'like' as the 460 is an Art Speed stick that rigs the same as a NP mast, and the 490 is a Power Z-axis, which also appears to work just like a pryde mast.






As you can see, the leech is way too loose. The 8.5m and the 7.5m both show way too much looseness in the leech when down-hauled to spec.

Oh well, time to buy a KA mast or two. I knew I wanted to spend more money

I have mostly Neil Pryde sails, yet I don't use any NP masts. I use a Tushingham 430, the ART speedstick 460, and the Powerex Z-Axis 490, and they all seem to be very similar to the pryde bend curve. It was only when I tried these on the KA sails that you realize how different they are.

It was time for a mast replacement anyway because <insert justification here>.

Gestalt
QLD, 14428 posts
23 Dec 2008 6:43PM
Thumbs Up

i'm not sure all is right here formula nova.

i agree that the sail looks too loose,

the masts i have had some experience with and my understanding is that the art masts are rebadged powerex masts. (can't say for sure that all art masts are rebadged powerex mast though).

either NP is becoming more constant curve or it's inconsistencies in the NP masts.


tim90
WA, 66 posts
23 Dec 2008 6:19PM
Thumbs Up

"As you can see, the leech is way too loose. The 8.5m and the 7.5m both show way too much looseness in the leech when down-hauled to spec."

Before getting the new masts, I would suggest rigging (and testing) the sails with reduced downhaul compared to spec. Quiet often you can find that the spec provided is the max/min limits of the tunning, and mostly used to advise the consumer about what length extension/boom is required. I think I remember useing the 07 koncept with a lot less downhaul then the spec suggested.

If the sails feel crap when downhauled such that they look correctly rigged, then it is probably time to get the reccomended mast.

mr love
VIC, 2358 posts
23 Dec 2008 9:11PM
Thumbs Up

Formula Nova , do as Tim 90 says and let off some downhaul. The specs are recomended max settings and the particular brand of mast and mast base will have an impact on the measurement. It looks over downhauled.
It also appears you have a lot of outhaul pulled on in these photo,s. Having the outhaul tight will tighten up the leech in the panel above the boom.
Can you rig it with less downhaul and outhaul (sail almost touching the boom) and take some more photo's?
What size sail is it?
I noticed a yellow Koncept as well. How is that rigging and on what mast ?
Thanks Martin

FormulaNova
WA, 14808 posts
24 Dec 2008 7:07AM
Thumbs Up

Gestalt said...


the masts i have had some experience with and my understanding is that the art masts are rebadged powerex masts. (can't say for sure that all art masts are rebadged powerex mast though).




I am pretty sure that the ART speedstick I have is different to 'normal' powerex masts, as it seems to rig perfectly on all of the pryde sails that I have. The V8s that I use on it are pretty sensitive to mast specs and they rig beautifully.

The 490 is a real powerex but I have read something about the 'z-axis' being a bit different to normal powerex masts.

FormulaNova
WA, 14808 posts
24 Dec 2008 7:38AM
Thumbs Up

tim90 said...


Before getting the new masts, I would suggest rigging (and testing) the sails with reduced downhaul compared to spec.
...
I think I remember useing the 07 koncept with a lot less downhaul then the spec suggested.


Hi Tim, when I started to de-rig the sails I let the downhaul off gradually until the leech went tighter, to what I would expect my V8s to look like. At that point the shape of the bottom of the sail looked all wrong. I took photos of the top of the sail, but not on the lower panels.

mr love said...

...
It also appears you have a lot of outhaul pulled on in these photo,s. Having the outhaul tight will tighten up the leech in the panel above the boom.
Can you rig it with less downhaul and outhaul (sail almost touching the boom) and take some more photo's?
What size sail is it?
I noticed a yellow Koncept as well. How is that rigging and on what mast ?
Thanks Martin


Hi Martin, the sail that I show is a 8.5m Koncept, and the yellow one is a 7.5m Koncept.

The 7.5m is rigged on the ART speedstick and the 8.5m on the powerex z-axis. They are both showing the same problem with a really floppy leech.

This is the top of the 7.5m:



They are definitely not over-outhauled as I released the outhaul entirely and the shape stayed the same (there was almost no tension in the outhaul). The downhaul is to spec and when released, the leech becomes tighter but at that point the bottom shape is all wrong. The really loose leech is still there even with quite a bit less downhaul (6cm?).

I don't have a problem with them not rigging on NP masts, as I figured I would try it first before seeing if I needed to buy the recommended masts or an alternate suitable mast. I was a bit surprised by the powerex result on the 8.5m though, but I think this suggests the powerex z-axis 490 really does have a NP type flex-top.

I will try and take some more photos of them rigged with these masts at various stages of outhaul and downhaul. I think I will end up buying a new 460 though and see if the shape changes, which I am pretty sure it will. There has been a fair bit written about NP mast bend curves and them being flex-top, so I can see why the shapes are the way they are.

Dale.





mr love
VIC, 2358 posts
24 Dec 2008 11:53AM
Thumbs Up

If thats the case then it seems that it is unfortunately a problem with mast compatability. The Powerex Z axis does surprise me as I have run my 7.5 on a Powerex Z Speed ( until it broke) and it was just fine.
Don't get too hung up about rigging to the exact spec, rig it so it looks and feels right and record the settings. It does vary alot depending what mast and mast base you use.
I will see if I can grab an 8.5 off Andrew and rig it on a Powerex Z Speed 490 that I have and see how it looks.

Regards Martin

sailquik
VIC, 6094 posts
24 Dec 2008 12:10PM
Thumbs Up

I rig my 08 9m on a Z-Speed 520 and it is perfect. I tend to think it is just overdownhauled

sailquik
VIC, 6094 posts
24 Dec 2008 2:04PM
Thumbs Up

Hi Dale,
I have just been out in the backyard rigging my new 7.5 Koncept to get some accurate reference numbers and pics.

The mast is 460 SDM IMCS25 CC

The mast length printed on the sail is the nominal total length to the bottom of the mast base. The actual downhaul setting is quite a bit shorter than this. I prefer to give the downhaul settings by measuring from the bottom of the mast to the bottom of the sail downhaul pulley when rigged. When I do this on my mast the figure is 478cm (EDIT: correct figure is 481) as you can see in the pictures below. This would be my starting setting but I would not go much more than about a cm either way.

The boom length is the max length and typically the set length will be a few cm's shorter. For the sail rigged in the pics it is 205cm measured as shown. This would be my starting position for medium winds and would vary a couple of cm either way depending on the conditions I am tuning for.

Try setting you sail to these specs on the mast you have and see what it looks like.

Cheers, Andrew D

[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]
[URL=] [/URL]

FormulaNova
WA, 14808 posts
24 Dec 2008 9:04PM
Thumbs Up

sailquik said...

Hi Dale,
I have just been out in the backyard rigging my new 7.5 Koncept to get some accurate reference numbers and pics.


There's nothing like a new sail!

Hi Andrew, I meant to get out there today and rig it up again and take a few photos with it with less downhaul, but I didn't. I remembered I have a NP X3 460 as well, so I can try rigging it on that as well and compare the two. Maybe tomorrow - what else do you do on Christmas day!

I am off to WA for 3 weeks on a windsurfing trip, so I was hoping to take the KA's. If I can get them to rig correctly on these masts I will definitely take them.

One thing I have to say about the 2009 sails is that they look more interesting/colourful. The orange one looks good. Maybe a whole lot of orange sails would be a great quiver...

I will try and take some decent photos when I go through the rigging process again and let you know how I go.

When I read your rigging guide for the 2008 sails I noticed that you put the boom on before any downhauling. Is that right? I am used to the Ezzy and NP sails where you put on a bit of downhaul before you can attach the boom. I tried this initially with the KA's and the boom cutout made it hard to get enough clearance to attach the boom. Is that normal?

Dale.






sailquik
VIC, 6094 posts
24 Dec 2008 11:34PM
Thumbs Up

Hmmm. Something really strange happened. I went and rigged that sail again to get some other pictures and this time it needed more downhaul to get the same set. I suspect the first time I didn't have the mast completely in the top of the sail. They are a bit tight at the head when brand new and sometimes hang up a bit. Anyhow, the second time it needed 481 cm to get the same set and I am now sure this is the correct measurement and I have edited the pictures above to show this.

mr love
VIC, 2358 posts
25 Dec 2008 12:13AM
Thumbs Up

Formula Nova , I raced around to AMAC's today and grabbed an 09 Koncept 8.5 straight out of the box. Rigged it on my (what I thought was) Powerex Z Speed 490 which turned out to be an ART Speedstick 490. Exactly the same mast.
It rigged perfectly, settings as per rigging guide, 510 luff ( chinook base on 20),220 boom.
Here,s some shots




Regards Martin

sailquik
VIC, 6094 posts
25 Dec 2008 1:52AM
Thumbs Up

FormulaNova said...



One thing I have to say about the 2009 sails is that they look more interesting/colourful. The orange one looks good. Maybe a whole lot of orange sails would be a great quiver...



I love the orange. I got a couple of yellow ones as well though.

FormulaNova said...



When I read your rigging guide for the 2008 sails I noticed that you put the boom on before any downhauling. Is that right? I am used to the Ezzy and NP sails where you put on a bit of downhaul before you can attach the boom. I tried this initially with the KA's and the boom cutout made it hard to get enough clearance to attach the boom. Is that normal?

Dale.


Yep. I leave the downhaul quite loose while I put the boom on. Then I outhaul and pop the cams on before downhaul. Attaching the boom with the luff loose is quite easy, but not if it is tight.

Easy to push the luff back and attach the boom when there is no downhaul:

[URL=] [/URL]

Another Angle:

[URL=] [/URL]

Slide to the bottom of the cut out before clamping to allow for downhaul later:

[URL=] [/URL]

Clamp and go to outhaul:

[URL=] [/URL]


westhammer
WA, 505 posts
25 Dec 2008 1:15AM
Thumbs Up

All very nice but allas just a load of blks



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"KA sails -what sort of mast?" started by lordhowe