Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk

Windsurfing slalom/speed sail twist

Reply
Created by sailquik > 9 months ago, 1 Apr 2019
decrepit
WA, 12095 posts
5 Apr 2019 2:32PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
RAL INN said.. >>> last weekend I tried chasing DAFF down the course my overpowered 4.7wave sail had a plenty loose leach and at speed and locked in was flapping as if there was no pressure on it From any where


Maybe you were over sheeting?

RAL INN
SA, 2884 posts
5 Apr 2019 8:47PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
decrepit said..

RAL INN said.. >>> last weekend I tried chasing DAFF down the course my overpowered 4.7wave sail had a plenty loose leach and at speed and locked in was flapping as if there was no pressure on it From any where



Maybe you were over sheeting?


Maybe I was out of control

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
7 Apr 2019 6:36PM
Thumbs Up

Too much downhaul can utterly kill a sails performance and stability. Just as bad as too little.

Imax1
QLD, 4676 posts
7 Apr 2019 8:27PM
Thumbs Up

^^^^
You just can't haul down two sail sizes . My laziness has often tried but never won .

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
8 Apr 2019 10:59AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
boardsurfr said..
You could always attach a couple of 10 Hz GPS units, one on top of the mast and one near the boom. Maybe make the top one a phone with an accelerometer app.


That would just measure the mast - deflection and vibration. That is likely to be useful, but is not answering the orgininal question. ( I thought you didn't like high-Hz devices because they just show noise?! ... have you changed your opinion - I may have missed it ? ... eg your 2018-02 post )

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
8 Apr 2019 11:03AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
IanK said...
What's a gust?


We know what gusts are from a human's perspective, and from a mathematical perspective - it is an increase in wind-speed, relative to the average wind-speed. The only important question is, how much time needs to elapse for it to be defined as a gust, vs say just a plain old wind-speed-increase. I would argue, "a few seconds" for windsurfing; it may be 10's of seconds for a 36ft yacht.

my $0.0001 ... no direct science... just an interpretation of existing aeroplane-wing studies, and my own experience. ... the discussion of flares is how Daffy and I think it might be possible to get some actual scientific results.

Primarily twist aims to stop the centre-of-effort moving upwards in the sail, during gusts -> this helps the sailor to control the instantaneous power of gusts. IMHO other effects are dwarfed by this, ie: "sail stability" is the main outcome. But in modern sails, that outcome isn't only due to twist, other factors help stabilise the sail, such as skin-tension, battens, camber-inducers, drag-reduction.

We also know that too much "stability" (say due to having 7 cams), results in sail which is largely uncontrollable. And twist has little effect on total/average power... that is simply body-weight/lead/comfort-factor/etc

Since we need some twist to control CoE, we might as well build twist in such a way that it has other benefits too... listing them here:
- control vertical movement of CoE during gusts... thus dynamic twist
- and to a much lesser extent, CoE moving aft.
- Ground-wind-speed vs 4m height wind speed, shows that it the air moves slower nearer to the ground. So some static twist helps to align the air-flow of wind at the top vs bottom of the sail.
- There is a large differential of pressure from windward to leeward - the foot of the sail is end-plated by the deck/water, so the top needs some neutralising ability, or we end up with the pic below
- Plenty of flow-analysis of wings show air moving away from the root - so it is pretty much a given that air-flow moves upwards away from the foot toward the tip. Having some neutralising-pressure helps to create a pressure-barrier.

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
8 Apr 2019 11:04AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Ben1973 said...
Winglets also in crease lift by stopping the air flowing of the end, air flow at end is higher than by body.


Air-flow at the tip of a wing, isn't higher - the air doesn't just start moving backwards on its own. ( Actually, depending on your point-of-view, the thicker section of foil does have higher-speed air-flow -> airliner wings sometimes have flow coming close to Mach, even though the fuselage is travelling slower. )

But yes winglets increase lift because when people discuss "lift", they actually mean "lift vs drag". And evidence shows that winglets reduce the magnitude of tip-vortex - a reduction in vortex, is this an increase in lift.

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
8 Apr 2019 11:04AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
[quoteJohn340 said...
I think the key to sail performance is to reduce the vortex round the head and foot of the sail. The vortex, and hence drag, is caused by the movement of air from the high side (windward) to low side (leeward) of the sail, at the head and foot boundaries of the sail.


I have been thinking about this for a while... It might be possible to make some type of winglet, but that gets complicated because it would depend on the rake. There might be relatively practical solution which is to have a vortex-generator at the tip -> simply to extend the top-batten about 6 inches behind the trailing edge of the sail.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
8 Apr 2019 9:30PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
mathew said..

IanK said...
What's a gust?



We know what gusts are from a human's perspective, and from a mathematical perspective - it is an increase in wind-speed, relative to the average wind-speed. The only important question is, how much time needs to elapse for it to be defined as a gust, vs say just a plain old wind-speed-increase. I would argue, "a few seconds" for windsurfing; it may be 10's of seconds for a 36ft yacht.


No, I think Barney is correct. It is one of those things that we all think we know what it is, but is extremely hard to define, even scientifically. probably because every single gust is different. EG. You actually mention average wind speed. So when does that 'gust' not be included in 'average wind speed'? Its tricky.

Select to expand quote
mathew said..
my $0.0001 ... no direct science... just an interpretation of existing aeroplane-wing studies, and my own experience. ... the discussion of flares is how Daffy and I think it might be possible to get some actual scientific results.

Primarily twist aims to stop the centre-of-effort moving upwards in the sail, during gusts -> this helps the sailor to control the instantaneous power of gusts. IMHO other effects are dwarfed by this, ie: "sail stability" is the main outcome. But in modern sails, that outcome isn't only due to twist, other factors help stabilise the sail, such as skin-tension, battens, camber-inducers, drag-reduction.

We also know that too much "stability" (say due to having 7 cams), results in sail which is largely uncontrollable. And twist has little effect on total/average power... that is simply body-weight/lead/comfort-factor/etc

Since we need some twist to control CoE, we might as well build twist in such a way that it has other benefits too... listing them here:
- control vertical movement of CoE during gusts... thus dynamic twist
- and to a much lesser extent, CoE moving aft.
- Ground-wind-speed vs 4m height wind speed, shows that it the air moves slower nearer to the ground. So some static twist helps to align the air-flow of wind at the top vs bottom of the sail.
- There is a large differential of pressure from windward to leeward - the foot of the sail is end-plated by the deck/water, so the top needs some neutralising ability, or we end up with the pic below
- Plenty of flow-analysis of wings show air moving away from the root - so it is pretty much a given that air-flow moves upwards away from the foot toward the tip. Having some neutralising-pressure helps to create a pressure-barrier.



Yes, they are some of the theories, but what I am asking for is actual evidence to support them. (and I fully accept that this may be like asking for evidence of what a unicorn is)

For instance, twist as an 'endplate' surrogate? Sounds good and all, but evidence please?

Deck of board endplating foot of sail? Again, quite a good theory, but can we find proof. After all, a lot of sailors sail with the foot of the sail quite away from the deck. Does this make a difference? Again, evidence?

Hopefully our 'smoke generators' may give us some.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
8 Apr 2019 9:39PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
mathew said..
But yes winglets increase lift because when people discuss "lift", they actually mean "lift vs drag". And evidence shows that winglets reduce the magnitude of tip-vortex - a reduction in vortex, is this an increase in lift.



Nit picking here : No, it is a decrease in drag. But of course, that does increase the Lift to Drag ratio.

Kwibai
74 posts
8 Apr 2019 8:32PM
Thumbs Up

I am following this topic with great interest and thank you Andrew for raising the question :-).

To me it's totally clear we're already bound by the box that we created the last decennia. Remember, it's only decennia of knowledge from the start of our beloved sport that got us here in the first place.

So why bother looking for the smoking gun within the box, litterally, when in reality the answer lies outside of the box we created ourselves.

The answer is not with the question how much twist is the right amount of twist. The answer is with the question why we need twist in the first place. The answer really is with the lack of power to compensate for the added drag that water brings, in it's non frozen state.

I see ice as a metaphore within our sport and it shows us our mortality as human beings and species. However important we might feel as "leading" organism in the world, we constantly forget to raise the right questions and in this case it's no different.

How can we increase efficiency, realizing the limitations we have as humans: length, weight, power, regardless how large one is as individual rider compared to the norm?

How can we increase efficiency per size? This is what we should look at from all given angles possible, knowing what we know after a few decades of development to unravel the mystery that makes us fly like butterflies over the waters of the seven seas.

Twist only holds so much of the answer. It's the sum of all elements that creates an optimum amount of twist for a given sail. A top rider can feel exactly which amount of twist is needed, which amount of positive or negative outhaul is needed, batten tension etc., in order to squeeze out the last drop of a given rig.

The main question here is: what kind of overall shape do you want a rig to have in order to maximize the power for a given person's weight, size and strength and, equally important, to minimize drag. When thought through in an eloquent way, the answer will automatically come from deeper within: control should be the base layer on which you build that rig as a designer of sails for those with limited strength: windsurfers.

We are the sum of the stays that hold the rig of a sailboat AND we've got something extra. We've got sensors in our body, organic sensors that help us stabilize the platform on which we stand and the rigs that's being connected by a small joint.

For us as windsurfers this is normal. For those who never felt what we are feeling on any day with more than a mild breeze, it's not.

We should take advantage of our biggest weakness: the lack of strength, and turn it into a feat. We could do so through accepting that given fact, embrace it and look for what we're best at: feeling.

We humans feel and can connect in ways no other organic system seems to do. But, just like with this sailing metaphore, we're succeeding to create a big mess out of the opportunities at hand. To me this also comes from the fact that we as humans feel superior to those on which our pleasure is based. The seacreatures where we come from. We are organisms formed by the force that shaped us and forms the largest part in us: water.

Now if we would think cellbioligy instead of physics. How would we then create the best sail possible? Wouldn't we adapt, just like we have done as species? This rethorical question brings me back to the sensors in the here and now: we humans.

We are wired through the WWW. We send and recieve. That's something we forgot but could be more aware of in the now than we have been for centuries. A time in which we forgot about higher values in life. A time in which we thought we were superior to those who said: ich habe es nicht gewusst. And what are we doing? Aren't we the same?

We look away from violence and act as if it's just not there. We live our happy lives and feed on fear, in the most in your face way as one could ever imagine. The news we're watching is showing us how to think and to be fearfull.

I might be crazy but I feel this simply wrong and a simple sport like windsurfing could be an incentive to turn this fear around and help make human life into something beautiful. All human life! So also those who now need to seek for shelter when bombs are hitting their homes because of some morons at the top who feel war is needed to calm the masses down. And we, silly cows, we consume and point fingers at the planes in the air, the boats that are cruizing the waters and ride our cars as if nothing could happen to us. We like pointing fingers and use facebook foor that. That's why I left. That's why I stopped looking at what's actually happening in the world: a totally stupifying, numb making dragon is catching us by our throats and leads us to oblivion as we're not seeing the kid anymore that is now hoping for a bomb to drop on his or her house as this little child doesn't WANT to live anymore.

Windsurfing was the first funsport born out of the hippie era. We evolved from triangle sails into sails with battens and wider heads. We then invented cambers to support the draft and balance. We then moved to easier to hold platforms on which kids could easily get to learn the sport and glide within a few hourse. Trapeze, for the talented to be learned within a week in which a mild breeze hits the shore.

What I hope for, and what I dream off, is that we, through sports and a new to be formed game could help turn the youth of the world around and give them a perspective to live for. Getting together. That's what this all should be about. Getting together by accepting your personal limitations as man and mankind.

Let cell biology be leading. Let organisms be leading and who knows, we might leave our grandchildren a world in which no whale washes ashore anymore with a belly full of plastic.

Lets start cleaning this earth and follow in the steps of Mandela, Ghandi, Matin Luther King, and not to forget: all mothers in the world. It's time for a turn around. It's time for the matriarch to rise and this is what I see in the now. We need to respect the fact that earth is our mother.

In love is the answer and only if we live from love for all living creatures in the world we can expect ourselves to get to the next stage of the computergame our world has become.

Think human: feel, love and then you find the answer. Think machine and you will become a machine that neglect all the facts written above. I truly believe we, as society are using this society as excuse for the missing personal action. We lack the wisdom, courage, determination and care to ensure our grandchildren can live the day. Now what does this say about us. What kind of message do we send to those out there?

We are not alone, even Nasa acknowledges that and expects to find proof of life on another planet within a decade.

The answer on twist? Think the small people we are and think the strength: feeling we hold, and you find the answer to the next generation of sails and who knows, much more.

RAL INN
SA, 2884 posts
9 Apr 2019 10:13AM
Thumbs Up

WTF

olskool
QLD, 2446 posts
9 Apr 2019 12:23PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
RAL INN said..
WTF



Stop n think...Read it again. Think about HOW everything comes to exist on our planet. Also think about WHY it has the form or shape it does. A fish needs fins to fly thru the water. A bird needs wings to fly thru the air. Both have evolved uniquely n differently for a specific purpose. To suit the particular niche of the animal in the intricate web of life here on our planet.
Sail design n foil design tries to mimick the forms found naturally on many animals. Forms created from eons of evolution.
Interesting thoughts, Kwibai. Perhaps a lil too philosophical for some to bother with.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
9 Apr 2019 1:48PM
Thumbs Up

Kwibai: " The answer is not with the question how much twist is the right amount of twist. The answer is with the question why we need twist in the first place"
I accept that this the question I have. There are MANY theories. I have some of my own from the experiences that I 'feel'. I would just like to see some scientific evidence that any of them are even close to the Answer.
But I didnt get any answers from you post. Sorry,

olskool
QLD, 2446 posts
9 Apr 2019 2:26PM
Thumbs Up

Chris249 explains pretty well in general forum thread by Nubie "Who invented loose leech sails." Sail twist is needed at differing amounts according to the style of sailing to be done.. A raceboard sail leech differs heavily to a slalom sail. An old 80s 6.5m possibly has same power as a new 8.0m loose leech sail. Its the development of better boards n fins as a complete unit which has made necessary the twist n loose leech sail to be investigated.

Kwibai
74 posts
9 Apr 2019 4:18PM
Thumbs Up

Thank you oldskool. You hit the right button. And Oceanmotion, I realize I sound like an old hippie and obviously did so on purpose. Sorry for seemingly stealing your topic for a political statement, but I did put in an underlying message that Oldskool has distilled from what I wrote, so someone caught my drift.

It's the sum of man, rig, fin and board which we need to look at. By getting rid of one of the variables the answers on the question at hand will tend to become extremely technical and physics will ultimately be the leading science doctrine as it is, or has been for ages to get a grip on questions like this. And then I am referring in general to technical questions on challenges at hand, seen from a designers perspective. So indeed, as Oldskool rightfully understood, I am referring to organic evolution and cell biology with a reason.

When designing a car and your aim is to go fast, "all" you need is the right streamline, powerful motor, a steering wheel, throttle and put a sucker behind the wheel willing to push that throttle. The end effect will be an end speed which is similar every time any man, woman or child capable of doing so hits that throttle. On a windsurfboard there will always be this mystical element.

Put two riders of exact the same weight and power on a board and one will go way faster than the other without an objective observer being able to see just why this difference is there. It's the subtle balance that makes this sometimes massive difference in speed. This is to me where the magic comes from in speedsailing and to me this is where we should try and get answers from. The answer might lie in personified possibilities to adjust the rig to one's style. In other words, the forces one uses to control the whole set. When we would put sensors on the worlds best riders, MASSIVE differences would emerge from the data collected on the water. Pressure on fin, mastfoot, pull on the boom, overall balance, will show to be extremely different per rider. So my main question is, would it be possible to even get close to defining the right amount of twist given the variables at hand when simply focussing on physics.

This is what I meant to say in my first answer. Only by taking a birds eye view and incorporating the person steering the vessel into the equation one might get useful answers. Generally speaking we know the rider itself is the limiting factor and this is a clear breach with for instance sailing. Our biggest gift to go fast seems to be the individual talent of a given rider to feel all variables at hand and get the best out of the set he or she is using.

Now there is one constant factor and that is the fact that any human body will face limitations related to strength. Hence my question: why not design with this fact of life in mind and think outside the box.

How could we organically evolve as species....so man/woman, board, rig, fin interconnected as species: windsurfer.

We still live within the Descartes doctrine of man as machine. Herbert Spencer has proven to be right in distilling the core from "origin of species" by proclaiming a "survival of the fittest" society that could and would lead to a few in charge. George Orwell has seen Big Brother before we handed out ourselves to this force that controls our lives and makes as numb as society in which indeed in name all sheep are equal, but some are more equal than others as written in another of his now world famous novels.

I wanted to add a deeper perspective and did so with the hippie era in mind, that amongst other things gave birth to our beloved sport. What if we look deeper into this matter and "imagine" with John Lennon. What if we forget about boundaries, borders, our little problems which are nearly all related to try and preserve what we have, mostly at the cost of something else.

What if we, as mankind start thinking from another level and accept we don't hold all the answers as the science on which we base our knowledge is limited, simply because we are limited. We are transmittors and recievers like for instance cell biologist Bruce Lipton says. Scientists like him and for instance Rupert Sheldrake were laughed at not long ago and seen as fake scientists mixing up wild ideas. In the now, I am one hundred percent convinced history will prove ideas spread by people like them will help us to evolve simply because their views, which are organically based, hold answers which the church of science has looking away from for centuries.

Just an example of one of Bruce's lectures.



Now translate this all to our computer era and you'll understand why organically growing computer systems will take over the world and come up with solutions we could never think of ourselves. It's simply because of this reason that science will (have to) make a shift from physics to cell biology as leading science. In other words, we need to start listening and incorporate all variables to come up with solutions, also solutions as "simple" as finding out how much twist would be needed in a sail.

And you know, I understand if people think "wtf" about the things I write. But I care about those who do are open to think deeper and understand there is a another meaning to all we do as person and society. Windsurfing as a sport could be used to get closer to the dream John Lennon wrote about. What if we can use this newly required knowledge based on cell bioligy to redesign our complete thoughts. And yes...this has to do with sailtwist, whether a given reader understands or not.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
9 Apr 2019 7:06PM
Thumbs Up

With the greatest respect Kwibai, I think you are missing the point.

It is a given that the sailor and whole rig interaction is part of the equation, but what I want to know is the physics a behind it.
Why is it that we have arrived at this point?
Before we know something concrete about that, we are just flailing around in the dark with trial and error.
Now if we could get a grasp on just some of the reasons for why this system works, we may have a more definite direction to go in.

What we see is different. You see that there is something that works and you are happy with that.

I am not happy with all the differing thoeries that may or may not explain it, and have little or no proper evidence to back them up.

I see qustions of WHY it works and WHAT is it about it that works. I know it works - more or less. I what to see some hard science evidence to explain it properly so we can focus on taking it further without lots more of the 'error' part. With trial and error, it is very easy to go down dead ends and waste a lot of energy and time. The history of windsurfing design is littered with it. If we had some evidential scientific explanations, we may be able to find ways to tune the whole rig to suit all size sailors better, and find those directions much faster to make us faster.

What you describe is the way things have been done and evolved, very slowly, because no one REALLY understands the physics and aerodynamics involved. It is that part I am trying to find answers to.

Biological evolution too untold millions of years to tune lifeforms to the environment. I just have not got that much time.

Kwibai
74 posts
9 Apr 2019 5:26PM
Thumbs Up

That last one. And this is where we potentially could get together as I am not saying we should exclude physics, I am merely saying, we should start out from the basic principle that the sail, board, fin and the guy or girl holding the set is an organism in itself, just like we as society are an organism itself.

Kwibai
74 posts
9 Apr 2019 6:25PM
Thumbs Up

Purely biologically speaking we are all one. We can conclude that we need to find the best synthesis possible between the visible components water, board, fin, sail, rider and then combine them with the non visible components. If you think deep enough you get to the words: air and feeling.

Take a breath first, before you read on (if you haven't fallen asleep). Feeling. The answer is with air and feeling.

Now if we could use the laws of physics to measure the combined forces the elements involved evoke, we might be able to find an answer to the question how much twist is needed but if we forget about cell bioligy, we might forget about that what cannot be seen.

I am sure the fastest responding sail possible, will be fastest for all and that given sail should first of all be incredibly easy to handle.

The better a rig feels the sailor, not the other way around, the faster one could go. So concluding and as a direct answer to your question: twist is related to body tension of the package at hand: the sailbody. The sailbody is related to the mast and cambers holding on to the mast, seen from this equation. The mast is related to the twist.

The sailor holds the rig with his or her fingertips and feels the tiniest change in windstrength at the various sections of the sail through the self balancing rig he or she holds. He is doing so while the seas outside break on a tormented shore which in leeward has a sandy coastline and the perfect speedstrip. It's blowing 35 knots on average. Wind is pretty laminar.

What kind of twist would we need you think?

How fast could we theoretically go you think?

We could go easily, hands down, go faster than 100 kn/h in that given breeze, relatively speaking to the forces on the sail that are being translated to the fingertips of the rider at hand. The rider glides and doesn't have to fight. Please again, try to understand or better feel what I am implying here. Visualize yourself on the speedcourse, every muscle tensed..

There is no answer possible to your question other than that we need a constantly varying amount of twist in a self setting sail that can be held with support of the harness, the righting moment and a few fingertips that steer this rig into the right direction with no problem whatsoever to balance the rig.

That my friend (litterally as eventhough we never met in the flesh I highly value you as a friend), is the right amount of twist. And that my friend is also an answer, but from the complete opposite side of the room.

I would really advice you to sit, relax and watch the movie as that guy ain't dumb. And if you listen carefully, he is also talking about twist. Organic twist. The twist I am trying to explain to you :-). I am windsurfer like you, and translate that what is being said to the thing I love most in my life, next to my beautiful girlfriend: our beloved sport.

In cell biology there are answers to be found, just like there are technical solutions to make these answers, visions of a sail that could be real, come alive. For that you need physics.

Ultimately cell biology is the true gift: inspiration. Inspiration, not from survival, but from the will to evolve to the best possible evolutionary solution. The rest is execution.

So what we saw and see as leading: physics, in the end would also hold back progress if we wouldn't open up to the other side of the equation: organisms and more important, what we are filing under organism.

In this case, in answer to your question, I propose to file the rig, sail, board, fin, waterstate, air and feeling under organism. Only if we do so, we might be able to find the best possible answer on your question.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
9 Apr 2019 8:29PM
Thumbs Up

Sorry, that is beyond my capabilities.

PS: What ever you are on, I want some! (but not what that guy in the video is selling. )

Kwibai
74 posts
9 Apr 2019 7:10PM
Thumbs Up

I am on love for our sport my friend. What the guy in the video is "selling" is more real than most of us realize in the now. Another guy I could advice to you is Rupert Sheldrake. He abstains more from this spiritual metaphores that Bruce Lipton is using and it would be easier for you to hear what he is actually saying after hearing Rupert Sheldrake first. Once you peel off this layers of over enthusiasm or poetic wording that, for Lipton, is needed to explain that what cannot be excplained, and get to the core, there is a lot of sense in what he puts forward.

My point is, that once you shift your focuspoint, solutions are being offered to you from an angle you simply didn't take into account before.

My suggestion is to see wind/air, waterstate, fin, board, sail, rider as one organism, the organism we truly are. If you are thinking about this from a profound level, not shallow as in...I rig my sail, put in my fin and go windsurfing. No, if you are going out and dedicate yourself to get the maximum out of the conditions at hand, you start paying attention to the last drop of detail and you start to become one with your gear.

Isn't that what GPS speedsurfing is all about? Isn't that what makes it so addictive?

So, yes I like to look deeper and wider to us as society and reflect on and come back to a topic if it interests me.

Twist is the most magical word to us as windsurfers since we started out that hunt for speed and just found out longer battens up until the mast, make a sail faster. I was already in it when we started to cut-off old windsurfers and put footstraps on them. Look at where we are now.

I got hooked to speed and never let go, so my drug, the drug I am on is love for our sport. And this love makes me think, feel and act like a hippie, not the drugs the hippies once needed to set themselves free from conventions. I mean, I am not against marihuana but I don't need it or crave for it to be convinced there is more to this life than we can see as humans. I don't smoke, I just don't feel like it, obviously after having a few sips as a young windsurfer and in the now an occasional smoke with an international visitor wanting to "feel" Amsterdam.

I just feel we are slowly missing the point as society and sometimes that makes me sad, hence my remarks on the kids we forget as a reminder of the consequences of our self indulgence as society.

But then I see sparks of hope and this hope, amongst other things is within this World Wide community of speed addicts, who can dig in deep into questions like twist. That is where I started from and that is what got me "on" what you would like to be on as well.

Now the answer is simple...you will want to be on the set I am designing in my head and for which I am trying to find the right talented engineers. We are moving and I am sure we are on the right track, also in regards to twist :-).

Pacey
WA, 525 posts
9 Apr 2019 7:33PM
Thumbs Up

One of the things that I still don't understand is how the top of the rig on many modern sails appears to be doing nothing most of the time. This video:


is from a 360 degree camera, which means you can rotate the view around to this viewpoint:


If you watch the video it's amazing how floppy the leech is and how little work the top of the sail is doing. Yet this is from one of the top slalom sailors in the world in an actual race, with a sail (Severne Mach 2) that is highly successful at both speed and slalom.

This totally conflicts with my mental model of a how a sail should work, but the evidence is that it does work and work well. What do you think Andrew, how do you explain this apparent lack of pressure in the top of the sail? Are we just dragging around an extra 1-2 metres of sail area just because we need it to get planing and up to speed, but then it is completely redundant?

decrepit
WA, 12095 posts
9 Apr 2019 7:43PM
Thumbs Up

One way to find out is to cut it off and see what happens. Got any old, surplus to requirements sails that would otherwise go in the bin?

John340
QLD, 3116 posts
9 Apr 2019 10:07PM
Thumbs Up

The question is, what is the advantage of having 1.5m2 of sail at the top of the mast just flapping around.

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
9 Apr 2019 11:53PM
Thumbs Up

Great find Andrew!

Well, that is my question as well.

My observation is that even when he is pumping to get out of a gybe, the top of the sail does not actually look like it has air pressure. It is still loose and flapping.

I can think of a few hypothesis that could be explored to answer this question:

1. The top of the sail IS actually doing nothing positive aerodynamically, but this actually leaves the bottom of the sail do everything so lowering the CoE to where it can be made best use of via the limited weight and leverage of the sailor. And it is better to have a long chord working area so they just make the sail bigger so it does not scare customers off, as it would if the top was just cut off. Also, if you just cut the top off you would have to have a different mast that was also cut off.

2. The top of the sail lines up with the airflow and this somehow smooths and reduces the tip drag vortex. Hard to believe this though with the sail flapping around all over the place.

3. The sailor rigged when the wind was lighter and didnt have time to change sails before the race so he just made the top past non effective so he could cope.

any other ideas?

The point is. These are all just totally unsupported hypothesis without any actual data to prove them. As far as I can work out, no one has tested a windsurfing rig in such a way to actually find out and show how the air flows over it? We know that sails like this work well in some situations, but do we really, really know the Physics of why?

sailquik
VIC, 6090 posts
9 Apr 2019 11:58PM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
John340 said..
The question is, what is the advantage of having 1.5m2 of sail at the top of the mast just flapping around.


That is only the question if we actually know that this is an advantage.

As far as I can see, one way to test that would simply be to cut it off as decrepit suggests. Of course, we would need to know that the rest of the sail would still take the same shape with the top gone.

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
10 Apr 2019 8:47AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
Kwibai said..
I am referring to organic evolution and cell biology with a reason.

...

That last one. And this is where we potentially could get together as I am not saying we should exclude physics, I am merely saying, we should start out from the basic principle that the sail, board, fin and the guy or girl holding the set is an organism in itself, just like we as society are an organism itself.


Name a single living cell - other than humans - which evolved rocket engines ? Or supersonic flight? Or skyscrapers ? Or thermal-lances?

What you said here, makes no sense ... we already evolved rig/board/etc designs - it is how we got to the shapes we use today -> your own post describes several of these incremental advancements.

How about staying on topic -> video-analysis is probably the best tool we have currently, as is highlighted in these videos.

mathew
QLD, 2044 posts
10 Apr 2019 8:57AM
Thumbs Up

Select to expand quote
sailquik said..
John340 said..
The question is, what is the advantage of having 1.5m2 of sail at the top of the mast just flapping around.


That is only the question if we actually know that this is an advantage.


We could cut off the top half of a sail... but then the now-top (aka the middle) would look very similar to designs from 20 yrs ago.

There have been other advancements in the last 20 yrs - skin-tension, materials, etc. Are those enough? ... it is hard to test because there have also been advancements in other components (fins, boards, masts, booms... GPS's!).

olskool
QLD, 2446 posts
10 Apr 2019 9:22AM
Thumbs Up

Mathew, sails n fins are only trying to mimic what is found in nature. Sail designers mustve looked at a birds wing for inspiration. Twist n looseness of leech is required bcoz we need to control the power produced. The sail is not part of the human body. We cannot control its shape or power as a bird infinately controls its wing in flight. We are stuck with a lifeless man made substitute.
Sure lets do the tests n refine the design. But until we have say, 97 sensors n servos which can infinately change the shape n power at will for performance, we are stuck with what we have. A design which has come a long way in the past 40years. But still has a LONG way to go to be equal with what is found in nature.

scottydog
230 posts
10 Apr 2019 7:35AM
Thumbs Up

I think even when the top looks floppy and appears to not be doing much, it's doing just enough to help with the overall drive is my thinking, if there was no pressure on it, the top of the sail would not open and twist off, but rather keep in line with the lower section and be flapping back and forth like a flag.

With the slightly higher windspeed than at the boom level, the top is angled better to just align with the apparent wind. The rig is healed over and raked back, so the top will naturally sheet in due to gravity just enough to align with slight pressure with the apparent wind, needs to very sutble as at that height the rig would have alot of leverage over the sailor. If on land with no wind the rig was raked back into the normal position when sailing, the floppy section would fall towards the "windward" side.

Would be amazing for one of the top sail designers to walk through each aspect of what the sail is doing all the way to the top. I do notice it's very rare I over downhaul, the other day was out trying my new Isonic 67 and it was feeling dead and was feeling a bit perplexed. I dropped the sail in the water and ratcheted on 3 more clicks on the XTR and man made all the difference!



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Windsurfing   Gps and Speed talk


"Windsurfing slalom/speed sail twist" started by sailquik