Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
I think its you that doesn't understand.
No, you don"t.
As I said above I am prevented from interfering ( making any innovations by PP ( paradox protection circuit) .
Completely pointless.
1. I will invent something and implement.
2.You will buy a hat and eat it
3.PP kick in
4.Innovation disappear or doesn't work
5. you regurgitate swallowed hat
GOTO 1
I would be worried about a raid by the cops macro .
Wouldn't surprise me if you had a meth lab going on you're farm.
With what you post .
Select to expand quoteactiomax said..
I would be worried about a raid by the cops macro .
Wouldn't surprise me if you had a meth lab going on you're farm.
With what you post .
I think the neighbours had some crops growing surrounded by lantana as a disguise, and he burnt it all off. Or the cows ate it and he ate the cows.
Then again, he could really be from the future. Plenty of crazy people think that. 
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..
You don't understand. If I disclose something that wasn't published yet ( mechanism that uranium isotope transmute) , then discovery will be attributed to me, chronologically.
But I am not the one invented this.
Be patient and drink your water slowly.
No I do understand -- you're deranged.
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
. Plenty of crazy people think that.
What about entertainment value?
Since when SB stands for Serious Business only..
or
Seriously Boring ... ?
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said.
No, I do not understand
Since you are lacking basic education on the subject
here is directory for you to learn more over holiday and weekend.
Type NETFLIX
then
search: 12 Monkeys
When you find it , it will be 13 Monkeys in total, hopefully not feral or fatal to anybody.
Select to expand quoteMacroscien said..FormulaNova said..
. Plenty of crazy people think that.
What about entertainment value?
Since when SB stands for Serious Business only..
or
Seriously Boring ... ?
Yes, I know you are just mucking around. If I genuinely thought you thought you were a time travelling inventor, I would just leave you alone and you could continue your discussion in the 9/11 thread 
Select to expand quoteFormulaNova said..
Yes, I know you are just mucking around.
Good, I thought that I need to make my post IQ rated again.
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..
No I do not understand
Good. I have basic IQ test for you. Doesn't take more the half an hour to finish.Please mark the picture where story told are more funny
.1.)
2).
Answer 1) continue on SB
answer 2) try Nickelodeon for a change
i know humor is a subjective thing but there's no universe where you're funnier then even Nickelodeon.
^ Milankovitch cycles have nothing to do with current global warming. They occur over such long cycles that the variation over the past 100 years is bugger all.
I have been trying to calculate how much fuel was / will be burned during our mega bushfire. The simple calculation could be :
Fuel load per ha x amount of ha burned
Then we could compare those to amount of coal and gas burnt in our thermal electric plants during the year.It could happen that amount of fuel burn in bushfires is equal to all our energy used in Australia.
That means that if we theoretically cutt all those trees , grass and bushes and burn them in in furnace we could achieve sustainable, renewable equilibrium without devastating effect. But somehow cleaning trees and bushes before disaster strike is strictly prohibited. Long term conclusion and analysis of existing bushfires may come to the same:
not climate warming or changing pattern is at fault but our civil engineering planning.
"To much trees along roads and dwellings."We hardly could effect climate, -winds and temperatures in Australia , but we could bulldozer trees, make fire breaks, divide huge forestry structures into smaller manageable parcels. Obviously we could also irrigate and humidify our country ,but that is another subject.
www.rfs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/97781/Comprehensive-vegetation-fuel-loads-Fact-Sheet-V8.pdf
Fuel load 10 to 30 tonnes per ha on average x .6,000,000 ha = 60 to 180 mln tone
that will be equivalent to 30 to 90 mln tonnes of good quality coal.
But Australia did dig 430 mln tonnes of coal every year- so our contribution to global warming even without any catastrophe but on ongoing everyday basis is 10 x more
Luckily we are all agnostic, otherwise somebody could say that GODS punish Australia for such predatory resources economy.
Penrith breaks the previous temperature record set two years ago with 48.4 deg. C.
I guess it's that pesky "natural variability" again, just happening to coincide with the highest GHG emissions in history. 
All I know that it is fact that the earth moves on its axis (compasses need to be adjusted) climate has always changed e.g. ice age, this all occurred before we added to the problem causing cities to be high health risk places to live.
This is the first season most fireworks have been cancelled.
Fact this is the worst summer for fires, dust, ash that I can rember and I am 73 yo.
