www.wnd.com/2019/08/court-rules-against-hockey-stick-climate-change-graf-creator/
The dude invented the hockey stick chart you were all sold.
Select to expand quoteboofta said..
Sold and swallowed by every hysterical greeny on the planet.
Picked it like a nose:Select to expand quotelog man said..
Well that settles it then........it's a huge fraud
BTW - climate change is real.
Select to expand quotelog man said..
Well that settles it then........it's a huge fraud
No of course climate change is real.
But if I asserted that graph was wrong a couple of months ago you've have laughed at me and labeled me all kinds of stuff.
See its not s simple as blindly following an ideology.
And you still poke fun at those who are even just moderately slightly to the "other side" than you
Select to expand quotelog man said..
Well that settles it then........it's a huge fraud
All Labor's fault...
I noticed last month it was really cold,
This month has been a lot warmer,
climate has changed
But yes, climate change is real. Time to stop digging big holes in the ground,look to alternatives and stop farting.
No that's simply not what it means. It's a libel case, and even if it wasn't, science is not decided in a court room.
If anyone needs to be in court, it's that douchebag Cook and his bullcrap 97%.
When the pollies and the activist start to address the real problem, population growth, then I will sit up and listen.
But for now they are still flying around to meetings and talking about population doubling in the next 50 years as though that's fine, and then buying beach front property.
Someone is telling lies I think.
The population of the West is clearly falling and by a lot too.
Look at the population of Australia,UK,N.Z,U.S and Canada as examples.
Were it not for the mass influx of immigrants their population would have nose dived significantly.
How anyone can buy this population increase theory when most are tending to have fewer kids and for many not at all.
The population of the poorer countries may well lead to an overall increase but the population of the Western countries in real terms is falling at an alarming rate.
Japan with little immigration is projected to half its population in the not too distant future.
Select to expand quotelog man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science? 
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..log man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science?
What did he do?
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..log man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science?
So what is the "exact" figure? 95%? 90%?
The people who like to claim that there is significant dissent also like to claim that the electorate has given their side an overwhelming mandate to do whatever it likes if they manage to win an election 52 to 48.
Select to expand quoteMr Milk said..Kamikuza said..log man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science?
So what is the "exact" figure? 95%? 90%?
The people who like to claim that there is significant dissent also like to claim that the electorate has given their side an overwhelming mandate to do whatever it likes if they manage to win an election 52 to 48.
Not what I'm claiming. The exact figure is not the point.
Select to expand quotelog man said..Kamikuza said..log man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science?
What did he do?
You gotta lay off the pipe, this has been gone through just recently.
They will make a movie out of this one day.But which hypocrytical Hollywood star will play Micheal Mann?
I like reading the comments, they are comical
here is one of the special comments
"The climate change hoax is pushed only by haters of God. Later when they are enjoying their special place God prepared for them, Christians will be treated to a new, rebuilt world without the haters in it.
from someone#"
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
The population of the West is clearly falling and by a lot too.
Look at the population of Australia,UK,N.Z,U.S and Canada as examples.
Were it not for the mass influx of immigrants their population would have nose dived significantly.
How anyone can buy this population increase theory when most are tending to have fewer kids and for many not at all.
The population of the poorer countries may well lead to an overall increase but the population of the Western countries in real terms is falling at an alarming rate.
Japan with little immigration is projected to half its population in the not too distant future.
you may have misjudged the population increases of asia, india, South America and Africa and the future increase projected
An example of the problems would be once india is not a pleasant place to live due to the human activities thrashing the environment the more well off Indians will shift to Australia.
Why does China need to buy up parts of Australian agricultural land to feed themselves?
Select to expand quoteWhy does China need to buy up parts of Australian agricultural land to feed themselves?
Because it's cheaper and more politically expedient than a military invasion.
Select to expand quotepetermac33 said..
The population of the West is clearly falling and by a lot too.
Look at the population of Australia,UK,N.Z,U.S and Canada as examples.
Were it not for the mass influx of immigrants their population would have nose dived significantly.
How anyone can buy this population increase theory when most are tending to have fewer kids and for many not at all.
The population of the poorer countries may well lead to an overall increase but the population of the Western countries in real terms is falling at an alarming rate.
Japan with little immigration is projected to half its population in the not too distant future.
Japan has never had much immigration, the decline in birth rates is the issue.
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..Why does China need to buy up parts of Australian agricultural land to feed themselves?
Because it's cheaper and more politically expedient than a military invasion.
And over population exceeding what food they can produce
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..Mr Milk said..Kamikuza said..log man said..
97 percent of scientists agree but Fred Nurk on seabreeze disagrees!!!
No, they don't. Like you, Cook misrepresented the data to drive the narrative.
I thought you were all about the cold hard science?
So what is the "exact" figure? 95%? 90%?
The people who like to claim that there is significant dissent also like to claim that the electorate has given their side an overwhelming mandate to do whatever it likes if they manage to win an election 52 to 48.
Not what I'm claiming. The exact figure is not the point.
99.4 is the latest........it's gone up!!!
Select to expand quotelog man said..
99.4 is the latest........it's gone up!!!
Oh cool. I'll just take your word for it. That's how science works after all and we all know how much the left loves science
Select to expand quoteKamikuza said..log man said..
99.4 is the latest........it's gone up!!!
Oh cool. I'll just take your word for it. That's how science works after all and we all know how much the left loves science
Here you go
www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2017/may/03/is-the-climate-consensus-97-999-or-is-plate-tectonics-a-hoax
Seems like the douchebag Cook was right on the money
OK, this a is a dangerous area to comment on and I generally don't.
But in a world where simply suggesting that the climate change models might be over-skinning the cat will get you sacked from your university and the hope of getting funding for a contrarian paper let alone published in a peer reviewed journal when all the reviewers are relying on grants that make it necessary to come up with headline worthy disaster outcomes is zilch, maybe a review of published papers isn't the way to find out what most scientists actually think.
You could just ask them (probably preferably anomalously; but I don't know).
The guy who did ( A Survey of American Meteorological Society Professional Members) came up with 52%
journals.ametsoc.org/action/cookieAbsent
