Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said...
Bloody auto-correct !
I now wot ewe meen
He should do Cobra. Anyone with some pace should be able to destroy the tail on that pitch. Probably even you in your youth
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said..
Bloody auto-correct !
Don't blame auto correct for not getting a root
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said..
He should do Cobra. Anyone with some pace should be able to destroy the tail on that pitch. Probably even you in your youth
Don't think so Ted not with a horrible arse like that he'd be lucky to walk
Clarke not back the leading wicket taker in the series - that should have been 4 from 4 overs for NL!
Select to expand quoteCobra said..
300 wickets is just inconsistent
2 good overs a day is inconsistent ! He is a great bowler but he can not bowl well for long or frequent periods. He is either hot or cold. And he is cold far too often. He did well this morning then could not finish them off. last night he was poor. First test poor. That's what I am talking about. I do not deny he is a giod bowler. But to be great you need to produce more often. Simple facts.
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said..Cobra said..
300 wickets is just inconsistent
2 good overs a day is inconsistent ! He is a great bowler but he can not bowl well for long or frequent periods. He is either hot or cold. And he is cold far too often. He did well this morning then could not finish them off. last night he was poor. First test poor. That's what I am talking about. I do not deny he is a giod bowler. But to be great you need to produce more often. Simple facts.
Haters will always hate.
Those two deliveries he sent down were unbevlievable...how was the look on the first blokes face
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said..Salty Sea Dog said...
Lords is far more suited to the Australian's. Cardiff was a lifeless pitch, so come Lords I expect the Aussie's to win and win well, just so long as the weather doesn't become England's 12th man.
At 1 all, we'll then see who has the minerals.
Spot on prediction - what's ur view now?
Hey Ted,
I don't think this one is over. If Australia can somehow find there way to posting a score of 150 for England to chase, they have the attack to take 10 wickets.
Now if England win, then I think the Ashes could be on the way back to England as there has to be one test that is a draw due to inclement weather conditions, and that is likely to be Trent Bridge as "its grim up North", and I can't see England losing at the Oval. 3-1...... and I would never have predicted that at the beginning of the series.
Then again what do I know? 
Select to expand quoteTux said..
Those two deliveries he sent down were unbevlievable...how was the look on the first blokes face
he Sh!t.
funny hearing stark had to scramble the seam to control the duke.
He was sh!te mate - mind you apart from Warner , Nevill & Johnno he had a few mates 
oh well League tonite 
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said..Cobra said..
300 wickets is just inconsistent
2 good overs a day is inconsistent ! He is a great bowler but he can not bowl well for long or frequent periods. He is either hot or cold. And he is cold far too often. He did well this morning then could not finish them off. last night he was poor. First test poor. That's what I am talking about. I do not deny he is a giod bowler. But to be great you need to produce more often. Simple facts.
Simple fact Ted you have no argument.
Another simple fact is MJ just went into the top 3 bat
/bowlers in Aussie history.
todays paper state the great DK Lillee called him "a once-in-a-generation bowler.
robert craddock of the courier mall said
Last night that inspired prediction was confirmed as australia's leftarm wonder exploded into the 300 club with a blitzkrieg at Edgbastone .
it was yet another blue chip performance from the ultimate blue collar hero.
I do not deny that he is a good bowler. All I am saying is that if he was more consistent he would be a great bowler. Simple. Sugar coat it how you like but can you seriously tell me that you did not wish he could fire more often? When he is on form batsman struggle to play him - as the stats indicate. But those stats should be a whole lot better imo. As Tux said he sent down two amazing balls. Its a shame he does not do not that more often with the skills he has.
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said...
I do not deny that he is a good bowler. All I am saying is that if he was more consistent he would be a great bowler. Simple. Sugar coat it how you like but can you seriously tell me that you did not wish he could fire more often? When he is on form batsman struggle to play him - as the stats indicate. But those stats should be a whole lot better imo. As Tux said he sent down two amazing balls. Its a shame he does not do not that more often with the skills he has.
I kinda agree.
2 good balls in the first over then... Nothing..
Scary, good bowler but inconsistent.
Didn't help that the other quicks bowled rubbish..
Select to expand quoteMacaha said..
Today I'm a pom
And today you have copped a BEERFINE ............ Section P - Paragraph M .......... "possibly or noticeably unwashed , smelly , whining , skiting , jumping on the bandwagon of opportunity , figjam ....."
Today that will be 1 x Sixpack
Select to expand quoteSP said..
Ted the Kiwi said...
I do not deny that he is a good bowler. All I am saying is that if he was more consistent he would be a great bowler. Simple. Sugar coat it how you like but can you seriously tell me that you did not wish he could fire more often? When he is on form batsman struggle to play him - as the stats indicate. But those stats should be a whole lot better imo. As Tux said he sent down two amazing balls. Its a shame he does not do not that more often with the skills he has.
I kinda agree.
2 good balls in the first over then... Nothing..
Scary, good bowler but inconsistent.
Didn't help that the other quicks bowled rubbish..
fark i would love to see you blokes play.
i must of watched a different game.
because the way i see it the batsman let us down.
clark is 170runs in the last 6 tests 13 runs for this test
forget saying the boys bowled rubbish smith & clark need to step up.
Nothing to do with what we are saying - stay on point
If you want to get into the nitty gritty of this test - yes batsman let you down and the other bowlers - especially Stark were poor last night when MJ was on fire. But my point is this - he only bowls well sometimes and when he does its normally for only 4 or 5 overs. If he could put it together regularly he would be amazing. But he is not. Just a great bowler every now and again.
Having said that he is more consistent than Mitchell Pearce - who must have photos of someone
now you listen here Mr Teddles he smashes those Kiwis, and you know that
and i get that your butt hurt
Select to expand quoteSP said..
I agree with both of you
i have tears from laughing...i would love to see ted and cobra on a television sports program...i change that after seeing both of them,,,,a radio sports show
Select to expand quoteCobra said...
now you listen here Mr Teddles he smashes those Kiwis, and you know that
and i get that your butt hurt
We never get the chance to play you for more than one or two matches. You boys scared ?
Select to expand quotechrispy said..SP said..
I agree with both of you
i have tears from laughing...i would love to see ted and cobra on a television sports program...i change that after seeing both of them,,,,a radio sports show
and what does clark do to MJ Ted drops a cherry.
as my grandfather said to me Ted.
cobra, you can't soar like an eagle when you hang around chooks
Select to expand quoteTed the Kiwi said...
Interesting first few overs
Forgot it was on mate, hope
I didn't miss anything..
I've had to go outside.. Wow
