Vote1: Panda and Loggy for forum mods.
Doggie, I kinda also agree that firearms for personal protection is a bad move. But OTOH one has to take into account that every dictator ever has disarmed the population quick smart to avoid resistance. That is a bit of a historical warning sign for us lucky ones who have never been subject to such things.
Plus the fact that it is entrenched in common law and statutes that a person can use like force to defend themselves (and rightly so). When gun use by crooks is becoming more common (like the NSW examples of late) at what point does Australia rethink things?
But like I said - first step is to adequately penalise those with illegal guns, not necessarily go for open slather like the USA has had
I find it rather interesting how ya all are experts on life in America and American gun laws.
I was not aware that Australians spent so much time in America, well you learn something new every day.
So in group A opinion: 2nd ammendment = gun nut excuse, and basically no real argument for the posession of firearms.
Group B opinion: 2nd ammendment is valid = reason to own, reason to possess firearms.
There's two lines of thought (among others) that the discussion has brought up. Why the name calling and ridicule? Are you trying to tell people how they should think on a discussion forum? Its also akin to racism what is occuring, some are generalising and insulting a large group of people purely on their belief/lifestyle.
Also, if you want to discuss productively; why not discuss any forms of USA law that doesn't begin with outright weapon bans (licencing, registration, sales, criminal penalties, etc)?
Try to keep it civil, its still a public forum with a few ground rules
I would also agree further regulation in some states might be a good thing.
Sorry, my spelling error; Amendment not Ammendment. im pretty sure you all knew what I mean't
EDIT: The d%%khead above did dye his hair just before the crime, he didn't look like that beforehand.