Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

Shark things out of hand in WA

Reply
Created by king of the point > 9 months ago, 14 Jul 2012
elmo
WA, 8727 posts
15 Jul 2012 10:38AM
Thumbs Up

Tell the fisherrapists to leave some fish for them to eat

poor relative
WA, 9089 posts
15 Jul 2012 10:42AM
Thumbs Up

My condolences to the family and friends. It's a shocking loss of life of someone so young.

I don't think culling sharks is the answer as has been said the ocean is their territory and we all know the risks when we go in.

The question I think that needs to be asked is are we overfishing? Are we slowly destroying and taking away their natural food sources and the sharks are coming closer and hungry looking for food. If so then this is what needs to be addressed

Subsonic
WA, 3119 posts
15 Jul 2012 11:02AM
Thumbs Up

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.

gs12
WA, 399 posts
15 Jul 2012 11:13AM
Thumbs Up

king of the point said...

Intrested to know if the helicopter / plane did a run up and down the coast


To see if there is a shark? According to news.com.au (www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/surfer-taken-by-shark-north-of-perth/news-story/c192660d4e28dccc660935a69213282a) the shark has been around for days (if you can trust the internet news):

* Local surfers at the beach had noticed a large shark in the vicinity in the previous four days. They had jokingly nicknamed it Brutus.

It's a tragedy but I can't stop thinking:
they knew (not sure if the guy knew but looks like "locals" did) shark was there but still went in and now everybody's upset that the sharks are after us.

Spamboy
WA, 14 posts
15 Jul 2012 11:52AM
Thumbs Up

Subsonic said...

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.


shark nets would work on some Metro beaches like Cottesloe or Scarborough just like they do over east. but you can't put a net around the whole WA coast and half the attacks have been at remote beaches far from Perth.

Subsonic
WA, 3119 posts
15 Jul 2012 12:08PM
Thumbs Up

Spamboy said...

Subsonic said...

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.


shark nets would work on some Metro beaches like Cottesloe or Scarborough just like they do over east.


That's what I was thinking. Ma and Pa can take the kids for a swim at the beach in relative safety. There was a shark attack at Cottesloe some years back where the GW came right in, the attack occured a few metres from the shoreline in amongst a whole bunch of swimmers.

The rest of us kids are big n ugly enough to take our chances with knowledge of the dangers along the rest of the coastline.....

Condolences to those involved.

hiho
WA, 65 posts
15 Jul 2012 12:42PM
Thumbs Up

Surfed Wedge regularly for the last 10 years. Heard some stories - but I've never personally seen or had a problem.

Surfed that particular spot 4 times in the last 2 months and although the thought is always in the back of your mind, just being out there surfing has always made any fear very secondary. Sounded like a terrific bloke - RIP Ben .

Innocence lost for Wedge now thanks to you 'Brutus'.

Now, find it and kill it - it'll be back no ifs or buts.

Love and Peace to all

ikw777
QLD, 2995 posts
15 Jul 2012 3:01PM
Thumbs Up

Subsonic said...

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.


Shark nets do not provide a barrier to keep sharks out of swimming areas. They are there to depopulate the local area of large sharks by killing them. They function the same way as baited drumlines. While they do kill a number of other species, they have been a very successful measure on East coast beaches, keeping the number of large, dangerous sharks at low levels. I am surprised they are not used around WA's metropolitan beaches at the very least.

choco
SA, 4032 posts
15 Jul 2012 2:45PM
Thumbs Up

the shark should be destroyed! if a dog did that would it still be wondering the streets?

Subsonic
WA, 3119 posts
15 Jul 2012 1:16PM
Thumbs Up

ikw777 said...

Subsonic said...

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.


Shark nets do not provide a barrier to keep sharks out of swimming areas. They are there to depopulate the local area of large sharks by killing them. They function the same way as baited drumlines. While they do kill a number of other species, they have been a very successful measure on East coast beaches, keeping the number of large, dangerous sharks at low levels. I am surprised they are not used around WA's metropolitan beaches at the very least.


After a little research, I see what you mean.

Surely its possible to design a net specifically to keep sharks out of an area, as opposed to entrapping and killing them though? Make the holes small enough and the sharks won't see it as something they can swim through? It wouldnt be miles of beach it had to enclose either, just a few hundred metres.

Mark _australia
WA, 22392 posts
15 Jul 2012 1:19PM
Thumbs Up

gs12 said...

king of the point said...

Intrested to know if the helicopter / plane did a run up and down the coast


To see if there is a shark? According to news.com.au (www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/surfer-taken-by-shark-north-of-perth/news-story/c192660d4e28dccc660935a69213282a) the shark has been around for days (if you can trust the internet news):

* Local surfers at the beach had noticed a large shark in the vicinity in the previous four days. They had jokingly nicknamed it Brutus.

It's a tragedy but I can't stop thinking:
they knew (not sure if the guy knew but looks like "locals" did) shark was there but still went in and now everybody's upset that the sharks are after us.



I saw that in the news too and it is total rubbish. There was a g/white seen about 200km north according to Fisheries, and bronzies are seen fairly regularly at another break about 4km - 5km away. The reporters have put two and two together, come up with five to make a better story

myusernam
QLD, 6123 posts
15 Jul 2012 5:33PM
Thumbs Up

poor relative said...

My condolences to the family and friends. It's a shocking loss of life of someone so young.

I don't think culling sharks is the answer as has been said the ocean is their territory and we all know the risks when we go in.

The question I think that needs to be asked is are we overfishing? Are we slowly destroying and taking away their natural food sources and the sharks are coming closer and hungry looking for food. If so then this is what needs to be addressed


don't they eat seals?
Reckon that cage diving could be making them less naturally timid of humans

nebbian
WA, 6277 posts
15 Jul 2012 3:45PM
Thumbs Up

Man powerheads are dangerous.

If you're talking about the style that slide onto the tip of a spear, which you then fire... then they're the same sort that if your spear hits a bit of reef and the powerhead explodes, then it propels the spear backwards at great velocity straight back through you.

Ouch.

I take my chances with the sharks thank you very much.

Marvin
WA, 725 posts
15 Jul 2012 3:48PM
Thumbs Up

Don't they roam the Indian Ocean from South Africa to Aus and back again?

They don't hang about, they cruise.

Heaven help us if this bad individual teaches his mates. He (or she) is rogue.

Ban cage diving with great whites.

GreenGriff
SA, 137 posts
15 Jul 2012 5:30PM
Thumbs Up

well we over fish the sharks food supplys with these things

www.communityrun.org/petitions/stop-giant-fishing-trawler-in-tasmania

cant expect them to do much else or get one of these

For self defense of course www.waspknife.com/

TurtleHunter
WA, 1675 posts
15 Jul 2012 5:18PM
Thumbs Up

sn said...

Why on earth dont a lot more skindivers, snorkellers (and by extension) windsurfers, surfers, or anyone who could be classed as potentially being tomorrows shark poo- carry a 12 guage smokey?
(official name "powerhead")
Our Western Australian firearms act permits you to possess one as long as its made to comply with the regulations and is stored and licenced as required.

This is about the only case where self protection is accepted as a legally valid reason to need a firearm.

The way I see it- a 12 guage is a bit more effective than poking a shark in the snout with your finger.

YMMV

you know that sounds like a good idea. 50 surfers out at trigg all with smokeys could fix a few problems.
RIP to the bloke who got taken but all these knee jerk reactions make you wonder if we are really evolving for the better.

myusernam
QLD, 6123 posts
15 Jul 2012 7:23PM
Thumbs Up

power heads are only good if you can see it coming. I would hazard a guess most great white attacks are by stealth

greenleader
QLD, 5283 posts
15 Jul 2012 7:51PM
Thumbs Up

sign the petition people, i'm off to get a new knife!

GreenGriff said...

well we over fish the sharks food supplys with these things

www.communityrun.org/petitions/stop-giant-fishing-trawler-in-tasmania

cant expect them to do much else or get one of these

For self defense of course www.waspknife.com/


MrC
1 posts
15 Jul 2012 9:56PM
Thumbs Up

i think its time for action to prevent any more deaths due to shark attacks.
sure they are a protected creature but so are crocs and lions.
what happens to them when they kill someone..... you take care of it.
sure there are fines involved if you kill a great white shark but there are people out there who are prepared to pay those fines for a safer existence of the watersport community

Woodo
WA, 792 posts
15 Jul 2012 10:05PM
Thumbs Up

jbshack said...
[
Spot on. Killing the sharks could make the situation even worse. If you don't like the odds stay out of the water.[}:)]




How will it make the situation worse?

hoppy
WA, 48 posts
15 Jul 2012 10:35PM
Thumbs Up

I dont believe it would make the situation worse.
We are protecting one main species while we go to town on the rest, we have decided along time ago that we know best and look at the result .
We dont need to cull we just need to be able to fish them again to reduce numbers

VB MAN
1156 posts
15 Jul 2012 10:51PM
Thumbs Up

poor relative said...

My condolences to the family and friends. It's a shocking loss of life of someone so young.

I don't think culling sharks is the answer as has been said the ocean is their territory and we all know the risks when we go in.

The question I think that needs to be asked is are we overfishing? Are we slowly destroying and taking away their natural food sources and the sharks are coming closer and hungry looking for food. If so then this is what needs to be addressed


ARE WE OVERFISHING???

Dude, thousands of tonnes are being pulled from the ocean each day,with no replenishment/sustainability factors involved, and if it continues, there'll be nothing left.

FormulaNova
WA, 14681 posts
16 Jul 2012 6:28AM
Thumbs Up

VB MAN said...

poor relative said...

My condolences to the family and friends. It's a shocking loss of life of someone so young.

I don't think culling sharks is the answer as has been said the ocean is their territory and we all know the risks when we go in.

The question I think that needs to be asked is are we overfishing? Are we slowly destroying and taking away their natural food sources and the sharks are coming closer and hungry looking for food. If so then this is what needs to be addressed


ARE WE OVERFISHING???

Dude, thousands of tonnes are being pulled from the ocean each day,with no replenishment/sustainability factors involved, and if it continues, there'll be nothing left.




So, by the sounds of that you are saying you don't know, and by implication, you don't know if there are any sustainability measures.

Why would you suggest that we are overfishing without any supporting information at all?

Thousands of tonnes? That sounds very general. Its a very big ocean.


FormulaNova
WA, 14681 posts
16 Jul 2012 6:37AM
Thumbs Up

Subsonic said...

ikw777 said...

Subsonic said...

What about shark nets? swimmers have a safe zone to swim in, no sharks have to be killed.


Shark nets do not provide a barrier to keep sharks out of swimming areas. They are there to depopulate the local area of large sharks by killing them. They function the same way as baited drumlines. While they do kill a number of other species, they have been a very successful measure on East coast beaches, keeping the number of large, dangerous sharks at low levels. I am surprised they are not used around WA's metropolitan beaches at the very least.


After a little research, I see what you mean.

Surely its possible to design a net specifically to keep sharks out of an area, as opposed to entrapping and killing them though? Make the holes small enough and the sharks won't see it as something they can swim through? It wouldnt be miles of beach it had to enclose either, just a few hundred metres.



I hope you are not relying on the Wiki article. I thought the idea of shark nets was to discourage sharks from setting up territory around those areas, not specifically to kill them.

A lot of the information on the Internet seems to be very sensationalistic about netting, but I can't find any actual studies.

myusernam
QLD, 6123 posts
16 Jul 2012 9:28AM
Thumbs Up

I don't think it's overfishing. GWS don't really chase down and eat fish from what I understand. They are too big to waste energy on a small fish to do that. They like large fatty animals (high energy) like seals and Whales.

In the other thread on sharks someone said there was a correlation between the resurgance in whales along the coast and GWS. Makes much more sense to me.
If this is true then it is ironically not due to overfishing but the opposite.

I think you could help yourself by not being out on the water near dawn or dusk. Shark shields are not foolproof but definatley do work to an extent. And they are fairly cheap.

Sailhack
VIC, 5000 posts
16 Jul 2012 9:35AM
Thumbs Up

myusernam said...

They like large fatty animals (high energy) like seals and Whales.


Maybe a link with increasing human obesity?

As for the most common times being dawn & dusk. With us working longer hours & hectic schedules, I know I'm guilty of being out on the water late, or having an early sesh...15-20 years ago I had more time & didn't push it - got out of bed later & was out of the water before dusk.

evlPanda
NSW, 9202 posts
16 Jul 2012 10:30AM
Thumbs Up

The Great Whites are not dumb. It's taken them a few decades but they've finally figured out there are easy snacks in the surf.

FormulaNova
WA, 14681 posts
16 Jul 2012 11:10AM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

The Great Whites are not dumb. It's taken them a few decades but they've finally figured out there are easy snacks in the surf.


I think you are right. It sounds like they prefer the nice fatty seals, but if it can't find one, or it thinks you are one by mistake, then it would take a bite to find out.

I do think they have a reasonable amount of intelligence though, or at least an understanding of where not to go. By not fishing them near human habitats, they have no fear of humans, and I think we might be seeing the results of that.

jbshack
WA, 6913 posts
16 Jul 2012 11:14AM
Thumbs Up

evlPanda said...

The Great Whites are not dumb. It's taken them a few decades but they've finally figured out there are easy snacks in the surf.


That really is stupid. How many times are sharks seen by surfers in the water? If they wanted ti they could eat one every few hours. But they don't i wonder why.

jbshack
WA, 6913 posts
16 Jul 2012 11:25AM
Thumbs Up

Woodo said...

jbshack said...
[
Spot on. Killing the sharks could make the situation even worse. If you don't like the odds stay out of the water.[}:)]




How will it make the situation worse?


GW's especially being low in numbers is throwing out the rest of the ecosystem. So we could see (sorry we are seeing) more smaller sharks, Plague proportions on our beaches. So instead of one big shark we may have to deal with 100 smaller sharks.

Seal numbers are increasing at an alarming rate IMHO. Every time i surf lately there are bloody seals in the water. What eats seals so are we already seeing an out of balance. Did you know a seal will eat about 100kilos of fish a day. So now with increasing seal numbers might we see a huge effect on local fish stocks? There for stimulating the already low fish stock/ no food problem.

Whales are starting to wash up dead all over the world a little now due to malnutrition. In some parts of the world Seal numbers grew so fast and now they have decimated (along with commercial fishing) local stocks and are now dieing as well.
On Saturday i went for look at my local and there was two guys and a seal in the line up. Seals are everywhere and they scare me TBH.

The Sea of Cortex now has Squid that are attacking humans. Funny point is that the local shark fishery in that area was decimated by commercial fisherman.

So sadly we don't know the answer. But we really shouldn't just have a knee jerk one either.

Sadly is though that my prediction is it will get worse still



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"Shark things out of hand in WA" started by king of the point