Forums > Land Yacht Sailing Construction

Y frame mini design hints?

Reply
Created by lachlan3556 > 9 months ago, 4 Nov 2011
lachlan3556
VIC, 1066 posts
4 Nov 2011 8:15PM
Thumbs Up

Hi everybody, hope the warmer weather is treating you all ok.

Been thinking about my next landyacht project and come to the conclusion it would be logical to make another FISLY mini. With all the great builds out there I am thinking of reeeaallly stretching my skills and building a Y frame mini . My question though is this; what size and section steel is appropriate for the axles?

Looking at most of the Y frame minis around I see that they have larger dia, round tube, and it has me wondering whether people have found problems using RHS. I know I should just bite the bullet and go with my gut...but the time I have to spend in the shed is so limited I don't want to use it building a lemon

Any discussion appreciated

Hiko
1229 posts
4 Nov 2011 5:58PM
Thumbs Up

Interesting that you are considering building a y frame mini Lachlan
Can I ask what your reasons are? Other than they look cool or I havent done one of these yet sorts of reason which are valid enough I suppose

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
4 Nov 2011 8:06PM
Thumbs Up

Funny, I've been thinking the same thing. But I reakon it's because they look cool. The gut feeling however is that it will likely end up heavier than a standard tee. Although seeing Paul's results from the weekend, it might not be the case!

lachlan3556
VIC, 1066 posts
4 Nov 2011 9:48PM
Thumbs Up

Ah, the reason:

A swept axle design would produce a shorter seat/capsule which will fit in a Toyota Yaris hatchback (although the axle sweep angle could be relatively small (~20 degrees) to achieve this, my gut therefore told me 30mm axles should be ok). This assuming I keep my "bull-nose" seat designs that I like, which I want to.

I just thought I'd throw the question out there in case I attempted using a more conventional/larger angle sweep (eg: 45 degrees) for the axles.

I don't have a preference re. the looks of T vs. Y frames, each have their atributes

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
4 Nov 2011 9:15PM
Thumbs Up

If your sticking with the 30mm square then probably dont sweep them more than 45.
yes we have been using bigger, usually higher tensile tubes, but you could try experimenting with some of the narrower Galtubes ,of the same typesas the fencepost mini spine tubes.
SOS come in at a whopping 39kg!!!!!!!

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
5 Nov 2011 1:06AM
Thumbs Up

This might get you thinking....

cisco
QLD, 12326 posts
5 Nov 2011 1:15AM
Thumbs Up

^^^^ They appear to be good for spin outs, two wheel stunting and being French and cool, but there was no speed footage.

Correct me if I am wrong, but wind powered speed is what most of us here are looking for, n'est pas?

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
5 Nov 2011 1:57AM
Thumbs Up

I said it would get him thinking..... I didn't say it was perfect

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
5 Nov 2011 7:57AM
Thumbs Up

landyacht said...
SOS come in at a whopping 39kg!!!!!!!


Paul, is that a fully rigged weight?

IPKSA
177 posts
5 Nov 2011 6:49AM
Thumbs Up

Another French Y frame miniyacht - Less angle than the Sailkart and aluminium axle tubes

lachlan3556
VIC, 1066 posts
5 Nov 2011 10:58AM
Thumbs Up

Thanks for the info/ideas. The french designs look, how do I say this politely, complicated (which is more a reflection on me than anything else). The sailkart has too high CofG, and pilot sits too far forward, plus those flexi axles don't look like steel . <45 degrees sounds good, thanks for the info. Will take a look at the gal-tube sizes next time I'm at the steel depot.

cisco
QLD, 12326 posts
5 Nov 2011 2:00PM
Thumbs Up

Gizmo said...

I said it would get him thinking..... I didn't say it was perfect


Touche'

cisco
QLD, 12326 posts
5 Nov 2011 2:02PM
Thumbs Up

grlynch said...

landyacht said...
SOS come in at a whopping 39kg!!!!!!!


Paul, is that a fully rigged weight?


One would hope so.

cisco
QLD, 12326 posts
5 Nov 2011 2:08PM
Thumbs Up

IPKSA said...

Another French Y frame miniyacht - Less angle than the Sailkart and aluminium axle tubes



That is definitely a better looking piece of kit but the crash scene looked VERY scary.

Without seat belts those things are going to break legs.

iand
QLD, 243 posts
5 Nov 2011 4:37PM
Thumbs Up

my suggestion would be to build the seat then Y it under the knees as shown with Paul's seat and my seat, keeping the bottom of the seat level with the bottom of the spine





aus715
VIC, 58 posts
5 Nov 2011 7:39PM
Thumbs Up

In the first French video, the black wheels were the cheapie Chinese ones I spotted in the garden centre a while back. Looks like they are working quite well...

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
5 Nov 2011 6:10PM
Thumbs Up

iand said...

my suggestion would be to build the seat then Y it under the knees as shown with Paul's seat and my seat, keeping the bottom of the seat level with the bottom of the spine







what he said

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
5 Nov 2011 6:13PM
Thumbs Up

lachlan3556 said...

Thanks for the info/ideas. The french designs look, how do I say this politely, complicated (which is more a reflection on me than anything else). The sailkart has too high CofG, and pilot sits too far forward, plus those flexi axles don't look like steel . <45 degrees sounds good, thanks for the info. Will take a look at the gal-tube sizes next time I'm at the steel depot.

I know Nickrum has done this alraedy, but broken masts for the Y frame axles,has to be considered. nickrum has shown that it can work on a 5 size yacht , so why not revisit that idea

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
5 Nov 2011 6:24PM
Thumbs Up

lachlan3556 said...

Thanks for the info/ideas. The french designs look, how do I say this politely, complicated (which is more a reflection on me than anything else). The sailkart has too high CofG, and pilot sits too far forward, plus those flexi axles don't look like steel . <45 degrees sounds good, thanks for the info. Will take a look at the gal-tube sizes next time I'm at the steel depot.

that second frnch design looked like weight position has been taken into account more, good folding effort too. the blokart wheelbase is becoming more prevailent than the smaller earlier efforts

Nikrum
TAS, 1972 posts
5 Nov 2011 10:38PM
Thumbs Up

Yes, that is right, They work well and depending overall load they might need a solid core turned up out of timber/lumber to fit internally to take out a little flex. They do seem quite hardy and help with the comfort of the ride. I think it is advisable to a piece of broken mast inside at the Chassis mounting end to protect against crushing when they are clamped in place.

Ron

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
6 Nov 2011 7:20PM
Thumbs Up

iand said...

my suggestion would be to build the seat then Y it under the knees as shown with Paul's seat and my seat, keeping the bottom of the seat level with the bottom of the spine


One of these days Ian i am going to have to borrow one of those seats to make a mold! They are comfortable!

iand
QLD, 243 posts
6 Nov 2011 8:32PM
Thumbs Up

no worries just give us a call. I find most people that contact me are mainly concerned about seat construction, you've probably had a few contact you by now (please encourage them)
One of the things I've noticed is some people having built a mini are ready to try something larger that has plans but maybe not as large as a class 5 or a class 5 that isn't a OTT . with this in mind a interesting design challenge might be a fixed class that would have the advantages of interstate racing knowing that your yacht would be equal and it is up to the pilot to win (like a laser or hobie 16 in water based sailing) I'd suggest Y frame with nasa mini class 2 dimensions(that way a windsurfer mast can be used and steering adds that extra dimension to construction) and no I havn't forgotten the Blokart- people in this part of the forum I feel are into building and sailing/racing a yacht they have built so this discounts the blokart. The club 88 comes close but is a class 5 with the associated costs and I believe a under slung Y would have more appeal, the same going for the promo. I seem to recall someone asking about class 5's recently (maybe Lachlan)like I did a couple of years ago and found it hard going getting the relevant information
Ian

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
6 Nov 2011 9:17PM
Thumbs Up

Just a quick question for the ones with a mechanical mind, With a square tube inserted into another square tube (like a LLMini rear axle) is there any advantage or disadvantage to have either a horizontal of vertical hole for the locking / positioning pin?
There would be the ability to do either, and the hole would be at least 100+mm from the end of support tube section.

cisco
QLD, 12326 posts
7 Nov 2011 11:48AM
Thumbs Up

Only thing I can think of is if it is vertical and inserted from the top, there is less chance of it coming out when sailing.

Any differences in strength would have to be minimal.

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
7 Nov 2011 9:30PM
Thumbs Up

all my square tube chassis ended up having a double sided Pop out fitting to hold it that was horizontal, then a rear fitted locking bolt that held the axle firmly in alignment. the stainless pop out is a riley product that was a perfect fit. i will do photos tommorow

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
8 Nov 2011 10:07PM
Thumbs Up

Gizmo said...

Just a quick question for the ones with a mechanical mind, With a square tube inserted into another square tube (like a LLMini rear axle) is there any advantage or disadvantage to have either a horizontal of vertical hole for the locking / positioning pin?
There would be the ability to do either, and the hole would be at least 100+mm from the end of support tube section.


Quick engineering lesson

Generally always drill across the load. This means if the load is vertical, (most cases) then the holes should be horizontall. Basically the strength of a beam lies in it's mass that is in tesnion, which would be the bottom surface normally, (the top surface would be in compression) of a square section loaded vertically. Think of an I beam, they should always be used so the section looks like an I, (as opposed to a H) the strength of the bean relies on the amount of steel under tension as far away as possible from the bend centre. Essentially when a beam is loaded vertically the bottom surface is in tension. you are trying to "snap" the bottom surface and compress the top. The vertical surfaces are just stopping it from buckling and holding the top and bottom sections apart. the more mass you leave in the top and bottom, the stronger it is. If you remove material from the surfaces under tension, or compression, the easier it is to snap at that point.

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
8 Nov 2011 10:48PM
Thumbs Up

Thanks grlynch for the info.... and I assume the more in the horizontal centre the better, as this would be a "neutral" point.

Next question to the 'Y' yacht builders what is size and materials being used for the rear axles... Carbon Fibre round tube, snow ski's steel round tube [size?] any others?
Any thoughts on 45 x 45 x 1.6mm or 40 x 40 x 1.6mm Square Galv tube for 'Y' rear axles?

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
8 Nov 2011 10:31PM
Thumbs Up

Gizmo said...

Thanks grlynch for the info.... and I assume the more in the horizontal centre the better, as this would be a "neutral" point.


Actually the neutral point, varies depending on the section. Generally it is quite high. think how hard it is to compress the steel compared to streatching it. Basically the vertical sections are there to hold the horizontal ones apart. Think of a truss, (not so much a triangular roo truss but a truss with two horizontal beams at the top and bottom and smaller section arranged in trialgles between them.

Basically you can remove quite a lot of the vertical component, untill of course it can no longer keep the flanges apart.

(had a few glases of wine by now, so let me know if this stops making sense!)

landyacht
WA, 5921 posts
8 Nov 2011 8:55PM
Thumbs Up

keep in mind when the axles get bent it always bend up AND back. the problem is a shock load when you slam down off 2 wheels.
forget 1.6 mm wall for this exercise, go up to 2mm.
do they make a 40x40 or a 45x45,somebody needs to make sure. I suspect it jumps up to 50mm
I think there is a round steel galpipe around 40mm(galtube plus by steelmark?)
Ive used 40mmx3mm T6 ally before, but it became hard to get, and tends to fail regularly with a good bash

Gizmo
SA, 2865 posts
9 Nov 2011 8:28AM
Thumbs Up

One of my local Steel supply places had the "Orrcon Steel" range in stock.
Yesterday I had in my hands on 20mm inside 25mm inside 30mm inside 35mm inside 40mm inside 45mm inside 50mm Square Galv tube. The tube thickness was 1.6mm and they all fitted SO nice, 2mm just doesn't work with the telescoping sections as the slightest inperfection in the tube just jambs things up.

grlynch
QLD, 208 posts
9 Nov 2011 8:05AM
Thumbs Up

There is a 40x40 in a range of thicknesses, (good refernce here with prices earlybirdsteel.com.au/rhs/rhs-square-painted)

I an imagine there is quite a bit of horizontal force when the yacht comes down at speed, but i can't imagine this would be much compared to the vertical force, and you have to put a hole in at least one direction.

All being said theory is theory, real experience would normally take precedence.



Subscribe
Reply

Forums > Land Yacht Sailing Construction


"Y frame mini design hints?" started by lachlan3556