CO2 Taxation Australia

Gillard is appalling, deficient and dishonest.

I also like "back stabbing proven liar"

My view: It is important not to be distracted by the fact that T-Bott is a goose, and just focus on the loser Labs running the show.

Too often we hear, "yeah, but she is better than him". So what? Being better doesn't make her good!

It would of been introduced buy both of them get over it. Its in. The main concern now is how the Government uses this tax to make a greener country.\

Well see as to what tenders they give out on infrastructure (cheapest) (as apposed to expensive and greener) My guess is the government dont give a **** about supporting greener technology
.The more Revenue will be raised for the government regardless of what happens.

No mate it is conspiracy no one went to the moon! Didn't you watch Capricorn one? The doco on the moon landing wit OJ Simpson?

This whole thing kind of reminds me of something I saw a while ago, oh wait, I know what it was...

geez mate calm down, your sounding really desperate.

Ah!!,that evil Dr. brown, forcing the PM into a Carbon tax that she's staked her political career on and wanted for 10 years.

We agree that the carbon tax will have no effect on carbon level so just call it the "2o12 tax overhaul" and stop ranting about it we should be better of with the new $18,000.00 free tax threshold and as per the 60% unhappy voters that the press want us to believe exist they have to stick it up their bum and wait for the next election, if we had an election every time the polls were bad for the government we would be voting every 2 weeks.
Also we should agree that both side of politic are liars (If I am elected it will be no GST..... I can recall someone saying that ) and be with it.

Pugwash, stop saying "Labs" it's....... HORRIBLE.

She should be upfront with it and say: It is not my fault.... the little (green) voices told me to do it!

In the same way global warming has morphed into climate change, what will carbon pollution morph into ? -

'non-natural chemical imbalances'
'atmospheric emisson situation'
'organo-chemical discharges of a non-neutral ambivilance'
'a load of ****e'

HEADLINE

CONSTRUCTION of the controversial Northam detention centre, worth $125 million, is expected to start in the next fortnight.

wonder if it is green friendly?

Sorry mate, I just can't agree with the "they're all liars". Lying is a huge political risk it can be easily proved . In my opinion, Reith didn't lie about "children overboard", he used incomplete and confused reports to the governments advantage. To me it's cynicism not lying. In the same way, Gillard didn't lie. How could she have foreseen what was going to happen in the election, and how could she have foreseen the 1 green in the Reps teaming up with 3 independents and a senate that would be green controlled. I really believe if Gillard had got through the last election with a slim majority but a hostile senate the thought and the possibility of the carbon price would not have been on the agenda. To me, that's political opportunism. It's slightly more palatable than lying. I guess to all the Gillard haters she's a liar and that's that. I just reckon that analysis in lacking in balance, subtlety and shows a misunderstanding of the historydon't you reckon there's a fair bit of "She's a witch" to all this Gillard hating.

Cory Bernardi

From the rabble who brought you Mark Latham .

Gillard agreed to take on a job, under a certain set of conditions. She has not stood by these conditions. Indeed, she has invented a completely new set of conditions for herself so that she may fulfill her own selfish goal of being Prime Minister.

For example, log man applies for a job logging old growth forests in Tasmania. In his interview, he tells the company he is experienced at logging plantation and old growth forests, but his preference is to log only plantation timber.

A few days after the interview, log man is offered a job to log old growth forests, which he accepts, as the salary of $60K pa is simply too high for him to resist. After three months in the job, log man tells the company, he can no longer log old growth forests, as his chainsaw is too small to cut through the big old trees and he is against it, as he said in his interview.

The company now has a job that is not being done, and log man is not able to do the job he said he would do. Three options for log man may be:
- The company provides log man the training and tools to do the job he said he was going to do.
- The company retrenches log man as he does not have the capacity that is required for the role.
- Log man resigns, as he recognises the job he wants to do, is not the job that he agreed to do with his employers during the interview.