Forums > Kitesurfing General

Show Pony Alert @ Brighton WA

Reply
Created by Bo > 9 months ago, 28 Dec 2010
This topic has been locked
rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 7:35AM
Thumbs Up

No, "Mr Float", that does not work for me -- it does not capture the dynamics and joint involvement and responsibility (the key point) involved imo.

Read the story again. Think of a young woman in a car with a baby in the back seat about to turn right across traffic on a busy intersection. Just at the moment of decision to 'go' into a tight gap in the oncoming traffic you yell out something about a broken indicator light. She's distracted and mistimes. Then you walk away from the resulting mess feeling 100% happy you helped. Actually then you would be interviewed by police as a public nuisance.

The point here for me, which I'm obviously not getting through, is the notion of joint responsibility in what we do. You got here through sexual intercourse. Who is responsible for the pregnancy? Same with social intercourse. There is joint responsibility. This aught to be fairly obvious unless your are high on the autism spectrum. This topic is a microcosm of the greater story in much of these threads -- kiteboarding as a public nuisance.

The golden rule is do unto others as you have done to your self. And that includes the manner and style. It is usually called common respect. Read the story again and note that the initial intervention was communicating incorrect information -- the bar was not around the wrong way!

On the basis of this ongoing feed back I might be persuaded to move from 60% up towards 80% -- but I doubt the voices venting here could come down from 100%. It is a fundamentalist thing and cognitive challenge for some.

jquigley
WA, 205 posts
3 Jan 2011 8:18AM
Thumbs Up

RSC, you are making very convincing argument here for me to ignore the next person that needs advice/assistance/.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 8:33AM
Thumbs Up

iti said...

RSC move on for pete sake,

you could of waited for a a couple on minutes and asked for help

you self launched didnt you , look in the mirror , dont blame no one other than the boy in the mirror

Laurie should close this thread down , i believe we are all over people who dont take cotrol for 100% of their actions,


1. Yes, I could have. Perhaps I had waited for many minutes already. Does the story tell you otherwise?

2. I was self launching with no one else in any danger from my actions (the CLEAR thing).

3. Interesting comment and reaction. Why the appeal to a higher authority (whoever Laurie is) -- is this not an open forum for discussion? Why are you trying to take control and shut it down?

It can stop anytime from my perspective -- but everyone should be entitled to share their views. Who knows, tomorrow someone may read this and add their 2-cents worth. Why does that affect you? It will die off naturally when there are no more comments and no interest. Why do you seek to intervene in a public discussion process? Want to burn some books next?

This is getting closer to the core attitudes and tone I'm seeking to study. What is it about this control obsession in this recreational activity and culture? Why all the anger?

Here again is a little something from a friend in another area altogether (i.e. comments on Dawkins). (the link if you want fora.tv/2009/10/07/Richard_Dawkins_The_Greatest_Show_on_Earth (and perhaps en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ouroboros):

"I like the golden rule, which in fact is very uoroburoslike, that when someone is externalising strongly a hate, he is trying to come to terms with this undecidability in him/herself." (Luc)

Now, thanks to another thread, here is a good day out for me:


BTW: "cotrol for 100% of their actions" -- I think you mean responsibility for (although 'control' as a core value is what a lot of these reactive responses here are about). In essence I can partly agree with you but only if you widen the scope of the interaction to include all parties - i.e. including the action of intervention. The only other close observer was her student. What did he see happen and of the resulting resolution? There are many angles to this type of thing. Don't be too quick to pass final judgments on limited 'facts' from one perspective.

I launched, I failed, I suffered, I learned. Now I've shared. Nothing more. And I've learned more even about the culture here. I have new insight into the issue I am researching which is outrage and anger as part of total risk assessment and communication.

If anyone is interested then check out Peter Sandman's Risk Communication and his 'Total Risk = Hazard + Outrage' approach (www.psandman.com/). It might help deal with some of the wider community concern and rising anger and outrage (it seems) associated with the Show Pony phenomena on public beaches (the thread title and original theme). Reinterpret his scale for outrage for kiteboarding and it might provide a means of communicating 'total risk' better across a whole spectrum of situations of concern -- and diversity of opinions.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 8:50AM
Thumbs Up

jquigley said...

RSC, you are making very convincing argument here for me to ignore the next person that needs advice/assistance/.



I'm just saying 'be careful'. Proceed with yourself in the picture as a co-participant. Being invited is one thing, and one approach. Butting in, because you 'think', is another approach. It may be justified but as we become more 'Americanised' then the trends will be towards litigation as resolution.

If you 'butt-in' then you are involved and it cannot be 100% the 'other' any longer. That is my point. Assess your own risk as well and do not act as if there is a separate distant event that you can walk away from.

If you pick the wrong person then it may be high drama in the courts or, as someone else has mentioned, the car park. The anger here is noticeable -- that is why I'm interested and concerned. It is a risk issue in the broader sense.

I'm no expert in communication: but a simple question "Can I help/assist?" is a good starting point.

If other members of the public were at risk also, then it might justify a stronger intervention approach. But in this case study that was not the case.

3 Jan 2011 12:09PM
Thumbs Up

rsc said...

BTW: "cotrol for 100% of their actions" -- I think you mean responsibility for (although 'control' as a core value is what a lot of these reactive responses here are about). In essence I can partly agree with you but only if you widen the scope of the interaction to include all parties - i.e. including the action of intervention. The only other close observer was her student. What did he see happen and of the resulting resolution? There are many angles to this type of thing. Don't be too quick to pass final judgments on limited 'facts' from one perspective.

I launched, I failed, I suffered, I learned. Now I've shared. Nothing more. And I've learned more even about the culture here. I have new insight into the issue I am researching which is outrage and anger as part of total risk assessment and communication.

If anyone is interested then check out Peter Sandman's Risk Communication and his 'Total Risk = Hazard + Outrage' approach (www.psandman.com/). It might help deal with some of the wider community concern and rising anger and outrage (it seems) associated with the Show Pony phenomena on public beaches (the thread title and original theme). Reinterpret his scale for outrage for kiteboarding and it might provide a means of communicating 'total risk' better across a whole spectrum of situations of concern -- and diversity of opinions.



The meaning or definition of Personal Responsibility hinges on your comprehension of the reality that the situation you eventually found yourself in, and where you were trying to apportion some blame to another, was entirely caused by choices, you made.

You chose to go kiting by yourself that day.
You chose not to go and talk to other kiters in the area
You chose to be shy
You chose to be unsure about the launch
You chose to listen to the advice of the passing instructor
Each of your parents, equally chose to have a root one day, you are the result of each of your parents personal choice, and now that you are an adult you need to learn about your choices, their consequences and your 100% responsibility for those choices.
There were at least several more poor choices you made that day that had a direct effect on the eventual outcome.

Stupidity is the result of the deferral of responsibility, so instead of examining ones choices and actions, then learning from them, one decides to stop looking for a way to improve and eliminate error, and instead focus on someone else to blame (ie, he said such and such, and that made me angry)
Unfortunately the laws in our society actually allow for the transfer of responsibility!!!!! (why - because it makes more money to make laws like that)

Join WAKSA, talk to locals, make some kiting buddies, avoid self launching and landing (but practice it if you are going to do it, in lighter conditions so you know exactly what to expect), and have fun.



Mr float
NSW, 3452 posts
3 Jan 2011 12:12PM
Thumbs Up

rsc said...

jquigley said...

RSC, you are making very convincing argument here for me to ignore the next person that needs advice/assistance/.



I'm just saying 'be careful'. Proceed with yourself in the picture as a co-participant. Being invited is one thing, and one approach. Butting in, because you 'think', is another approach. It may be justified but as we become more 'Americanised' then the trends will be towards litigation as resolution.

If you 'butt-in' then you are involved and it cannot be 100% the 'other' any longer. That is my point. Assess your own risk as well and do not act as if there is a separate distant event that you can walk away from.

If you pick the wrong person then it may be high drama in the courts or, as someone else has mentioned, the car park. The anger here is noticeable -- that is why I'm interested and concerned. It is a risk issue in the broader sense.

I'm no expert in communication: but a simple question "Can I help/assist?" is a good starting point.

If other members of the public were at risk also, then it might justify a stronger intervention approach. But in this case study that was not the case.


thanks for your words .It has reminded me that there are people like you out there and I will certainly be more"careful"

Bigwavedave
QLD, 2057 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:38AM
Thumbs Up

I don't think he realises that kiting is not an individuals' sport. What we do on the beach and on the water reflects on the sport as a whole.

The fact that he was unaware of WAKSA, their fight to maintain access for local beaches and that risky behaviour on the beach is what threatens our sport amazes me. The fact that he attempted a self launch while not 99.9999% sure of what he was doing dumbfounds me.

Some people just don't get it, and never will.

Meanwhile the rest of us will have a ball, laugh with our mates and enjoy this fabulous sport.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 9:54AM
Thumbs Up

"Unfortunately the laws in our society actually allow for the transfer of responsibility!!!!!" (KitePower Australia, Steve McCormack, 54 y.o.)

Thank you for your response.

Well that about sums up the total irresponsibility of the situation imo. Thank you for that outburst. I now see that it is people like you who are respponsible for setting this strange tone in this kiting domain.

If you are in a position of leadership and influence, which is appears to be the case, then you need to be removed and counseled until you can respect the laws of the land. Your attitude is outside the law and needs reviewing urgently!

You will have drawn the attention of authorities to your company, in your lawless attitudes.

Your attack on me is, again, your opinion: and you are entitled to it. But I do not share it. I'm entitled to my views. And, as it seems you have confirmed by your outburst, I am correct -- there is shared responsibility under the Australian Law.

Your attitude and public statement under this corporate LOGO is of great concern in my opinion. I will be happy to quote you in my paper on the topic.

I think there needs to be a public statement somewhere that confirms that Kiteboarding associations work and profess under the law of the land. Something here is 'out of control' and I think we have just found it. Does WAKSA endorse your views on this matter?

Basically, Mr McCormack, you can change the laws, or you can change your self. I know which is easier. But setting this type of tone in a public forum is the height of irresponsible behaviour. You should be cautioned.

And, 'Mr float' -- you are welcome. Take care.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 10:13AM
Thumbs Up

Bigwavedave said...

I don't think he realises that kiting is not an individuals' sport. What we do on the beach and on the water reflects on the sport as a whole.

The fact that he was unaware of WAKSA, their fight to maintain access for local beaches and that risky behaviour on the beach is what threatens our sport amazes me. The fact that he attempted a self launch while not 99.9999% sure of what he was doing dumbfounds me.

Some people just don't get it, and never will.

Meanwhile the rest of us will have a ball, laugh with our mates and enjoy this fabulous sport.


I don't think you realise that it is not a sport for me. I drive a car, I am not in a motor sport.

I am doing my own private R&R at my local beach. I have not joined a cult (or have I?). I have read the WAKSA material. So?

Good to see you have moved off 100% down to 99.9999% -- it is a start ... keep going, it is good for the wellbeing.

The risk on the beach was to me and me alone. Until being interrupted at a critical moment. The rest is your issue.

With the attitudes and anger expressed here I might actually vote with local councils that are trying to keep popular beaches safe for everyone. Read the story and stop projecting all the blame for every PR problem this kiting activity (and for some a sport) has today. Your attitudes are contributing to your blindness. The Show Pony factor is the bigger issue -- not a small one-off self launch side narrative.

As for getting involved with WAKSA -- not likely if this is the 'friendly' and immature attitudes I'm likely to find.

harrysurfer
WA, 254 posts
3 Jan 2011 10:49AM
Thumbs Up

i bet u have these types of arguments in your everyday life. seems in your mature years u still have not learned lesson number one> stop blaming other people.

i also laughed in your earlier post at u getting angry after u face planted hurt rib etc...

one of those hey anger problems, i wonder how many times u have smashed your keyboard already during your fierce posting.

chill out man stop trying to get your point across or we will keep dangling the bait and ull keep biting Yawnnnnnnnn!!!!!

harrysurfer
WA, 254 posts
3 Jan 2011 10:50AM
Thumbs Up

btw for the record i wasnt laughing at the fact u got hurt just the fact u got angry

stvo69
NSW, 20 posts
3 Jan 2011 1:52PM
Thumbs Up

wtf.
Laws of the land.
Legal system
lawless attitudes.
interviewed by police as a public nuisance,
final judgments
attitude is outside the law
shared responsibility under the Australian Law.
height of irresponsible behaviour
getting involved with WAKSA -- not likely
I don't think you realise that it is not a sport for me
I might actually vote with local councils
corporate LOGO
high drama in the courts
litigation as resolution. etc etc etc etc etc Yada yada yada


Your insane mr rsc

herbyburger
WA, 301 posts
3 Jan 2011 10:59AM
Thumbs Up

This is crackin me up!

R0CKSTAR
35 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:04AM
Thumbs Up



The risk on the beach was to me and me alone. Until being interrupted at a critical moment. The rest is your issue.




If it wasn't for your incompetency, the instructor wouldn't have had to advise you. Apportioning blame to her is utterly bizarre. Trying to come up with some kind of blame % is just silly and puerile. You f**cked up, period. You are entirely responsible. Trying to debate it further is simply making you look foolish. Be a big boy, take it on the chin, learn from it and move on.

Bigwavedave
QLD, 2057 posts
3 Jan 2011 1:08PM
Thumbs Up

we need more like him in the sport! They make for entertaining youtube vids !!

stvo69
NSW, 20 posts
3 Jan 2011 2:11PM
Thumbs Up

Mr rsc





R0CKSTAR
35 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:20AM
Thumbs Up

And here is some more footage of our good friend RSC, 'ripping' it up!

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:21AM
Thumbs Up

harrysurfer said...

btw for the record i wasnt laughing at the fact u got hurt just the fact u got angry


Really?

Anger is normal -- anger management is what it is about. It should be over in 20 minutes at most. And no, I'm not an angry person by nature. Perhaps that is the rub here. Wind is crap, comment all you like -- I just come here to check the graphs. (And collect more data if available).

It is the background residual anger being displayed that I'm interested in.

iti
QLD, 417 posts
3 Jan 2011 1:24PM
Thumbs Up

RSC you are a child grow up ,

dont kite at our local spot you are not welcome and you will be shown the door ?

dont need clowns like you at our local spot who are not responsable for thier actions

R0CKSTAR
35 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:29AM
Thumbs Up

iti said...

RSC you are a child grow up ,

dont kite at our local spot you are not welcome and you will be shown the door ?

dont need clowns like you at our local spot who are not responsable for thier actions


Ditto RSC. Don't Kite at my local either. You won't be welcome until you decide to grow up and act like an adult instead of a moody teenager.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:29AM
Thumbs Up

R0CKSTAR said...

And here is some more footage of our good friend RSC, 'ripping' it up!



And mocking this poor person on a learning curve, and by inference all persons in such positions.

Interesting, any more attitudes to vent?

stvo69
NSW, 20 posts
3 Jan 2011 2:30PM
Thumbs Up

Anger is normal
It is the background residual anger being displayed that I'm interested in.
anger management is what it is about.

stvo69
NSW, 20 posts
3 Jan 2011 2:37PM
Thumbs Up




rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:38AM
Thumbs Up

stvo69 said...

wtf.
Laws of the land.
Legal system
lawless attitudes.
interviewed by police as a public nuisance,
final judgments
attitude is outside the law
shared responsibility under the Australian Law.
height of irresponsible behaviour
getting involved with WAKSA -- not likely
I don't think you realise that it is not a sport for me
I might actually vote with local councils
corporate LOGO
high drama in the courts
litigation as resolution. etc etc etc etc etc Yada yada yada


Your insane mr rsc



Good to see you are engaged with key points.

BTW: it is "You're" as in 'you are'.

harrysurfer
WA, 254 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:39AM
Thumbs Up

rsc said...

harrysurfer said...

btw for the record i wasnt laughing at the fact u got hurt just the fact u got angry


Really?

Anger is normal -- anger management is what it is about. It should be over in 20 minutes at most. And no, I'm not an angry person by nature. Perhaps that is the rub here. Wind is crap, comment all you like -- I just come here to check the graphs. (And collect more data if available).

It is the background residual anger being displayed that I'm interested in.


when i broke my leg kitesurfing i didnt even get angry not for 1 min, i just got my mate to quickly drive me home so i could have a smoke and a beer before heading off to the hospital. theres no room for anger in sport. Unless of course u want to be known as the john mcenroe of kitesurfing.

look no hard feelings mate just get better at kitesurfing swallow your pride and when ur rippin it by the end of the month ull just read ur posts and shake your head in shame, i hope.

your getting red thumbed left right and centre because your attitude may result in bans and i guess some of us dont want u to get hurt.

stvo69
NSW, 20 posts
3 Jan 2011 2:46PM
Thumbs Up

Here is a big kiss from me X

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 11:57AM
Thumbs Up

harrysurfer said...

rsc said...

harrysurfer said...

btw for the record i wasnt laughing at the fact u got hurt just the fact u got angry


Really?

Anger is normal -- anger management is what it is about. It should be over in 20 minutes at most. And no, I'm not an angry person by nature. Perhaps that is the rub here. Wind is crap, comment all you like -- I just come here to check the graphs. (And collect more data if available).

It is the background residual anger being displayed that I'm interested in.


when i broke my leg kitesurfing i didnt even get angry not for 1 min, i just got my mate to quickly drive me home so i could have a smoke and a beer before heading off to the hospital. theres no room for anger in sport. Unless of course u want to be known as the john mcenroe of kitesurfing.

look no hard feelings mate just get better at kitesurfing swallow your pride and when ur rippin it by the end of the month ull just read ur posts and shake your head in shame, i hope.

your getting red thumbed left right and centre because your attitude may result in bans and i guess some of us dont want u to get hurt.


Well 'anger' is the topic now is it. Along with liberal ad hominem.

Yes, I may look back in time and smile, but what I'm saying about risk is relevant now and in the future. Some here seem to get that much at least.

Other personal attacks are interesting and irrelevant except to display the broader culture of this forum. Ignore this thread/topic if it disturbs you.

I'm improving. This is just part of the process of my kiteboarding experience.

Now here is a jackass --
(from other thread)

My exercise is not going to generate any bans. But this type of Show Pony idiocy is. I suggest you all get back on topic.

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 12:05PM
Thumbs Up

R0CKSTAR said...

iti said...

RSC you are a child grow up ,

dont kite at our local spot you are not welcome and you will be shown the door ?

dont need clowns like you at our local spot who are not responsable for thier actions


Ditto RSC. Don't Kite at my local either. You won't be welcome until you decide to grow up and act like an adult instead of a moody teenager.


"Don't Kite at my local either." -- good, now we are into the 'my turf' and "you are an outcaste" for having 'other' views stage are we. Own your own private beach do we? Perhaps I'll get 'glassed' down the local pub as well?

Keep 'em coming!

rsc
WA, 96 posts
3 Jan 2011 12:15PM
Thumbs Up

iti said...

you dont get it do you


Get what?

Please explain.

getfunky
WA, 4485 posts
3 Jan 2011 12:31PM
Thumbs Up

I see the internerd tuff guys are flexing their muscles as usual, instead of staying on topic.

Maturity is allowing discussion on comments that differ from you own and not a sheeple group attack on someone who offers a diff viewpoint.



I'm not saying I neccesarilly agree with rsc - but some of you laydees are just to darn tuff and scary.

Always luv it when easter counterparts stick their peckers into a WA issue having never kited here or seen the amount of clowns and carnage.

Now - who wants to discuss the problems at Brighton - not posture with your mouse in one hand and your tool in the other?



Subscribe
Topic Is Locked

This topic has been locked

Forums > Kitesurfing General


"Show Pony Alert @ Brighton WA" started by Bo