Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...

4 corners

Reply
Created by choco > 9 months ago, 30 May 2011
This topic has been locked
doggie
WA, 15849 posts
31 May 2011 12:35PM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...

I grew up on Farms and have seen many animals killed. Saying that the above video shocks me so much that I had to turn it off.

Can anyone actually explain the religious benefit or why this is necessary for animals to be killed in such a way when there are clearly more humane ways to do it???

I'm off to search google, if I find anything useful I will post the links here.


I couldnt watch it either I didnt have a problem with the bolt but after that, na just had to stop it!!

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
31 May 2011 12:41PM
Thumbs Up

Could not watch it too! I wish I could be vegetarian but I am weak and love meat too much, I do a fair bit of clay shooting but could never go and join the boys for a fox or rabbit hunt........... not even going close to roos or pigs.
I choose the hypocritical solution and believe that meat is just a product that grows on the butcher's shelves.

CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
31 May 2011 2:42PM
Thumbs Up

Here is some info from the other side of the equation: The Non Western side.

www.mustaqim.co.uk/halal.htm


This same spiel is repeated across most Muslim sites.


If you read it what do you think??

barn
WA, 2960 posts
31 May 2011 12:57PM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...

Here is some info from the other side of the equation: The Non Western side.

www.mustaqim.co.uk/halal.htm


This same spiel is repeated across most Muslim sites.


If you read it what do you think??


It's probably on most Jewish sites as well, from what I gather Kosher is the same..

Its udder rubbish, they are making the same terrible excuses they always do. A bolt gun knocks the brain out, without the brain there is no pain.. They are trying to explain how a slit throat is less painful and less distressing.. A bolt gun is the same as a bullet, I know which I would choose..

The reasons they do it is to get rid of all the 'unclean' blood and also to make sure the animal is 'alive' and not diseased or something (which might have made sense in the bronze age desert)..

This is the link I posted earlier which refutes all ther claimswww.johannhari.com/2010/11/19/we-should-not-tolerate-religious-excuses-for-extreme-animal-cruelty

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
31 May 2011 12:57PM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...

Here is some info from the other side of the equation: The Non Western side.

www.mustaqim.co.uk/halal.htm


This same spiel is repeated across most Muslim sites.


If you read it what do you think??

I read it and it is convincing enough, but did not see the bit about blunt knife?

rodders67
NSW, 176 posts
31 May 2011 3:17PM
Thumbs Up

doggie said...

Gorgo said...

This topic came up a couple of years ago. I think it was animals being slaughtered in Saudi. They would slash the cow's eyes and blind them. Once they can't see the cattle quiet down and they can be managed more easily.

At risk of being branded a racist, I find religions in general to be offensive.

I can understand people taking comfort in having faith in some sort of deity or ideology.

I feel no sympathy for religions if they require you to:
- wear a special hat
- wear special clothes
- wear your hair in a special way (head or facial)
- remove parts of your body (unless there is a demonstrable medical or hygiene reason to do it)
- eat/not eat any foods for any other than nutrition and hygiene reason
- prepare foods in a ceremonial way (unless it is for hygiene reasons, or possibly, a philosophical reason to improve the treatment of animals. Maybe a ceremony requiring the people to appreciate the fact that animals are being killed or people are working hard to provide the food. Definitely not something requiring stuff be done to the animal or food.)
- get pregnant every time you have sex.
- forgo routine, mundane life saving medical interventions
- anything else that gives me the sh.ts



+ 1 could not agree more


+2 SICK TO DEATH OF EXCUSES

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
31 May 2011 1:22PM
Thumbs Up

rodders67 said...

doggie said...

Gorgo said...

This topic came up a couple of years ago. I think it was animals being slaughtered in Saudi. They would slash the cow's eyes and blind them. Once they can't see the cattle quiet down and they can be managed more easily.

At risk of being branded a racist, I find religions in general to be offensive.

I can understand people taking comfort in having faith in some sort of deity or ideology.

I feel no sympathy for religions if they require you to:
- wear a special hat
- wear special clothes
- wear your hair in a special way (head or facial)
- remove parts of your body (unless there is a demonstrable medical or hygiene reason to do it)
- eat/not eat any foods for any other than nutrition and hygiene reason
- prepare foods in a ceremonial way (unless it is for hygiene reasons, or possibly, a philosophical reason to improve the treatment of animals. Maybe a ceremony requiring the people to appreciate the fact that animals are being killed or people are working hard to provide the food. Definitely not something requiring stuff be done to the animal or food.)
- get pregnant every time you have sex.
- forgo routine, mundane life saving medical interventions
- anything else that gives me the sh.ts



+ 1 could not agree more


+2 SICK TO DEATH OF EXCUSES


+1 so do I

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
31 May 2011 1:26PM
Thumbs Up

felixdcat said...

CMC said...

Here is some info from the other side of the equation: The Non Western side.

www.mustaqim.co.uk/halal.htm


This same spiel is repeated across most Muslim sites.


If you read it what do you think??

I read it and it is convincing enough, but did not see the bit about blunt knife?


Convincing but, one sided..

pweedas
WA, 4642 posts
31 May 2011 1:44PM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...

Here is some info from the other side of the equation: The Non Western side.

www.mustaqim.co.uk/halal.htm


This same spiel is repeated across most Muslim sites.


If you read it what do you think??


This article tries to sanitise the procedure by totally neglecting to mention the practicalities of carrying it out on a large scale.
The origin of it goes right back thousands of years when the animal being killed was raised from birth in the household of the family which would eventually kill it and eat it.
The animal, be it a sheep, goat or cow would live in daily contact with all members of the household. They would naturally develop some empathy with it and attachment to it.
The procedure was meant to instil in the people a clear understanding that their life was given sustenance by the laying down of the life of another.
It was said that the life was in the blood and the body was something separate.
The life belonged to god and therefore had to be poured out. They were then free to use the body for food.

The point is, because the animal lived with the people, there was no trouble in getting up close to it, laying it down and cutting its throat. It would have been a very difficult job to cut the throat of something that you had lived with for the last few years and this would have made clear to the people that it is not an action to be regarded lightly or with disrespect.
Provided this is done with a sharp knife and is not a hackfest I don't have a problem with it.

What there is a problem with is that when the procedure is converted to a production line, it loses all meaningful symbolism and becomes more a representation of mans barbarity.
It is impossible to humanely restrain an animal like this on a production line sufficient to cut its throat in a humane manner. It was clear that stress and injuries to the animals were a normal and expected occurrence in getting the animal into such a position that its throat can be cut.
It was also clear that the entire procedure was carried out with total disrespect for the life of the animal, which totally negates the symbolism that it is supposed to be complying with.
The website above completely ignores this.

Hopefully, if this program gets some air time in Indonesia it might alert them that all is not as perfect and painless as they believe.
It was also clear that the procedure had absolutely no religious significance to the workers carrying out the killing.
It was a prime example of pretending to comply with the letter of their law without any regard for the meaning of it.
Since it no longer has any meaning then it should be stopped.

Trant
NSW, 601 posts
31 May 2011 5:13PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...In the UK now it's almost impossible to buy meat that isn't halal.



Just a quick aside, Halal meat in the UK is mostly done by stunning the animals first.
www.guardian.co.uk/theguardian/2010/sep/20/halal-meat-the-truth

Despite this, the halal food authority, which certifies meat for outlets such as KFC, controversially allows animals that are stunned before being killed to be certified as halal. And, according to an RSPCA fact sheet, 90% of animals killed for halal food in 2004 were stunned first. As in mainstream food production, the animal's throat is then cut


Makes you wonder, surely the Quaran doesn't specify that the animal can't be stunned first.

poor relative
WA, 9089 posts
31 May 2011 3:17PM
Thumbs Up

I love this thread
Westerners are so self fkn righteous.
We never ever do anything inhumane to animals.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
31 May 2011 3:21PM
Thumbs Up

poor relative said...

I love this thread
Westerners are so self fkn righteous.
We never ever do anything inhumane to animals.



We are cruel and inhumane to people as well, where does it stop PR? I actually think that Muslims are more cruel to their own women than their animals

slainte
QLD, 2246 posts
31 May 2011 5:22PM
Thumbs Up

CMC said...

I grew up on Farms and have seen many animals killed. Saying that the above video shocks me so much that I had to turn it off.

Can anyone actually explain the religious benefit or why this is necessary for animals to be killed in such a way when there are clearly more humane ways to do it???

I'm off to search google, if I find anything useful I will post the links here.


+1

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
31 May 2011 3:29PM
Thumbs Up

doggie said...

poor relative said...

I love this thread
Westerners are so self fkn righteous.
We never ever do anything inhumane to animals.



We are cruel and inhumane to people as well, where does it stop PR? I actually think that Muslims are more cruel to their own women than their animals

I agree! and since when 2 wrong make 1 right???

japie
NSW, 6852 posts
31 May 2011 5:38PM
Thumbs Up

poor relative said...

I love this thread
Westerners are so self fkn righteous.
We never ever do anything inhumane to animals.



Ed Zacary! Just fits in with the agenda to give animal cruelty a muslim slant. If you scratch around on the internet you can find all manner of evidence from all around the world, including Australia.

myusernam
QLD, 6121 posts
31 May 2011 5:38PM
Thumbs Up

felixdcat said...

Select to expand quote
rodders67 said...

doggie said...

Gorgo said...

This topic came up a couple of years ago. I think it was animals being slaughtered in Saudi. They would slash the cow's eyes and blind them. Once they can't see the cattle quiet down and they can be managed more easily.

At risk of being branded a racist, I find religions in general to be offensive.

I can understand people taking comfort in having faith in some sort of deity or ideology.

I feel no sympathy for religions if they require you to:
- wear a special hat
- wear special clothes
- wear your hair in a special way (head or facial)
- remove parts of your body (unless there is a demonstrable medical or hygiene reason to do it)
- eat/not eat any foods for any other than nutrition and hygiene reason
- prepare foods in a ceremonial way (unless it is for hygiene reasons, or possibly, a philosophical reason to improve the treatment of animals. Maybe a ceremony requiring the people to appreciate the fact that animals are being killed or people are working hard to provide the food. Definitely not something requiring stuff be done to the animal or food.)
- get pregnant every time you have sex.
- forgo routine, mundane life saving medical interventions
- anything else that gives me the sh.ts



I agree except I embrace racism in most forms.
Funny and awesome.

dinsdale
WA, 1227 posts
31 May 2011 3:43PM
Thumbs Up

barn said...
Dinsdale again, how can you criticise another religion for being "Crack pot'.. Your all equally crackpot..

Trying to draw any kind of moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam is complete lunacy. I happen to fully agree with every point on doggie's list, except the last one of course.

EDIT: Yep, sorry gorgo/doggie.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
31 May 2011 3:45PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...

barn said...
Dinsdale again, how can you criticise another religion for being "Crack pot'.. Your all equally crackpot..

Trying to draw any kind of moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam is complete lunacy. I happen to fully agree with every point on doggie's list, except the last one of course.




Ar that was gorgo but I did agree

K Dog
VIC, 1847 posts
31 May 2011 5:54PM
Thumbs Up

Agree - its a good list.

Going but what most relic religions enspouse, it would seem that god(s) is quite primitive.....

Any one see Futurama the other night? Very good take on religion.

Bender meets God, after first experiencing what its like to be a god to some miniture like people, very funny episode.

Bender asks to be sent back to Earth and god goes "where's that?".

CMC
QLD, 3954 posts
31 May 2011 6:05PM
Thumbs Up

I went and seen a NoFx show in Brisbane.

At the end of the gig they did the strangest cabaret, musical dance number. If you're familiar with them they are not exactly a dance, cabaret band.

Anyway the theme to their song was "Everyone's a little bit racist and the sooner we all realise it the sooner we can start to get along"

They had Mexicans, Blacks, Jews etc etc all calling each other names and hugging. It was funny but I think it has some significance to this topic.

I don't agree with killing animals this way and I fully agree with Pweedas. That's intelligence at work right there. Acknowledge why it occurs and but then make it relevant to the present day. Halal and Kosher slaughter has obviously failed to modernise.

Either way there's no need to make this a racial topic where we make it about hating Muslims. Hate breeds hate. There's enough Propoganda and extremist Christians and Muslims in the world already.


Signed the Half Irish, Catholic white guy.

dinsdale
WA, 1227 posts
31 May 2011 4:06PM
Thumbs Up

I love animals too - bar-b-qued mainly .

I hunt, and I love eating meat. I'll shoot ANY feral animals on sight. I shoot roos, but only enough for my and my family and friends' consumption. I'm looking forward to my 1st camel hunt. Goat, camel and roo meats are each really nice eating.

However, I and all the hunters I know abhor cruelty to animals. We shoot head shots only - 1 shot, instant kill, and that goes for the ferals as much as roos! (If you think I'm not that good a shot, volunteer to prove it one night. How about you barn? ) I know 3 full time professional shooters, and they're the same. My religious beliefs don't preclude me from hunting or eating meat, but unmitigated cruelty is unequivocally out! I've killed and butchered scores (could even be hundreds by now) of animals, but my gut is as disturbed by Muslim barbarity and any other animal cruelty as much as yours.

EDIT: On a different note, the Jews do (or so my Jewish friend says) stun or in some other way " anaesthetise" their animals before their kosher slaughter. She's not sure how they do it.

doggie
WA, 15849 posts
31 May 2011 4:11PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...

I love animals too - bar-b-qued mainly .

I hunt, and I love eating meat. I'll shoot ANY feral animals on sight. I shoot roos, but only enough for my and my family and friends' consumption. I'm looking forward to my 1st camel hunt. Goat, camel and roo meats are each really nice eating.

However, I and all the hunters I know abhor cruelty to animals. We shoot head shots only - 1 shot, instant kill, and that goes for the ferals as much as roos! (If you think I'm not that good a shot, volunteer to prove it one night. How about you barn? ) I know 3 full time professional shooters, and they're the same. My religious beliefs don't preclude me from hunting or eating meat, but unmitigated cruelty is unequivocally out! I've killed and butchered scores (could even be hundreds by now) of animals, but my gut is as disturbed by Muslim barbarity and any other animal cruelty as much as yours.


Well said Dins, agree totally

K Dog
VIC, 1847 posts
31 May 2011 6:31PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...

I love animals too - bar-b-qued mainly .

I hunt, and I love eating meat. I'll shoot ANY feral animals on sight. I shoot roos, but only enough for my and my family and friends' consumption. I'm looking forward to my 1st camel hunt. Goat, camel and roo meats are each really nice eating.

However, I and all the hunters I know abhor cruelty to animals. We shoot head shots only - 1 shot, instant kill, and that goes for the ferals as much as roos! (If you think I'm not that good a shot, volunteer to prove it one night. How about you barn? ) I know 3 full time professional shooters, and they're the same. My religious beliefs don't preclude me from hunting or eating meat, but unmitigated cruelty is unequivocally out! I've killed and butchered scores (could even be hundreds by now) of animals, but my gut is as disturbed by Muslim barbarity and any other animal cruelty as much as yours.

EDIT: On a different note, the Jews do (or so my Jewish friend says) stun or in some other way " anaesthetise" their animals before their kosher slaughter. She's not sure how they do it.


A knee jerk reaction to your post would be to say shooting is wrong in the sense you use it, however I think you are more connected to life than most of us.

The great australian duopoly does the job for me - thanks Mr Coles and Mrs Woolworths.

felixdcat
WA, 3519 posts
31 May 2011 5:04PM
Thumbs Up

As I said I like shooting but never shot anything alive as I do not enjoy hunting. But if my life depended on shooting (for food or defend myself or family) I tend to believe I would squeeze the trigger.

Ados
WA, 421 posts
31 May 2011 5:07PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...

I love animals too - bar-b-qued mainly .

I hunt, and I love eating meat. I'll shoot ANY feral animals on sight. I shoot roos, but only enough for my and my family and friends' consumption. I'm looking forward to my 1st camel hunt. Goat, camel and roo meats are each really nice eating.

However, I and all the hunters I know abhor cruelty to animals. We shoot head shots only - 1 shot, instant kill, and that goes for the ferals as much as roos! (If you think I'm not that good a shot, volunteer to prove it one night. How about you barn? ) I know 3 full time professional shooters, and they're the same. My religious beliefs don't preclude me from hunting or eating meat, but unmitigated cruelty is unequivocally out! I've killed and butchered scores (could even be hundreds by now) of animals, but my gut is as disturbed by Muslim barbarity and any other animal cruelty as much as yours.

EDIT: On a different note, the Jews do (or so my Jewish friend says) stun or in some other way " anaesthetise" their animals before their kosher slaughter. She's not sure how they do it.


as a former hunter I totally agree with Dins.

SomeOtherGuy
NSW, 807 posts
31 May 2011 7:10PM
Thumbs Up

I did see the tail end of it and that was pretty bad. Initially I thought the same as probably most people - we should ban live export and I agree there's a good case for that.

But after a while, I came to the same conclusion as pweedas - ban exports and we lose any chance to change things. We'll be able to be smug and say our livestock isn't being killed that way but livestock will still be killed that way. As it is, our exporters are putting pressure on to get things changed. They claim things used to be even worse (and I don't doubt them). So you gotta ask yourself - do you want to be smug or do you want livestock to be handled humanely?

I've seen another doco of the deed being done here in Aus according to halal requirements. Here the livestock is stunned and the workers have got 30 seconds to do the deed. Also, livestock are penned separately and only come into the slaughter room when their numbers up, getting stunned along the way.

adolf
1862 posts
31 May 2011 5:45PM
Thumbs Up

I only caught a bit of it. That cow at the end trembling as his mates were tortured made me feel sick all day - I still feel sick. May even turn vegetarian for a few days.

Stupid Indonesia, just another reason to never go there.

Cassa
WA, 1305 posts
31 May 2011 5:45PM
Thumbs Up

Ados said...

dinsdale said...

I love animals too - bar-b-qued mainly .

I hunt, and I love eating meat. I'll shoot ANY feral animals on sight. I shoot roos, but only enough for my and my family and friends' consumption. I'm looking forward to my 1st camel hunt. Goat, camel and roo meats are each really nice eating.

However, I and all the hunters I know abhor cruelty to animals. We shoot head shots only - 1 shot, instant kill, and that goes for the ferals as much as roos! (If you think I'm not that good a shot, volunteer to prove it one night. How about you barn? ) I know 3 full time professional shooters, and they're the same. My religious beliefs don't preclude me from hunting or eating meat, but unmitigated cruelty is unequivocally out! I've killed and butchered scores (could even be hundreds by now) of animals, but my gut is as disturbed by Muslim barbarity and any other animal cruelty as much as yours.

EDIT: On a different note, the Jews do (or so my Jewish friend says) stun or in some other way " anaesthetise" their animals before their kosher slaughter. She's not sure how they do it.


as a former hunter I totally agree with Dins.


+1

barn
WA, 2960 posts
31 May 2011 6:27PM
Thumbs Up

dinsdale said...

barn said...
Dinsdale again, how can you criticise another religion for being "Crack pot'.. Your all equally crackpot..

Trying to draw any kind of moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam is complete lunacy. I happen to fully agree with every point on doggie's list, except the last one of course.

EDIT: Yep, sorry gorgo/doggie.




How about the moral equivalence of Halal meat in the following..

-denying family planning to the developing countries (overpopulation, starvation)

-denying abortions in all cases (Mexico et al)

-denying cheap prevention of AIDs in developing countries

-scaring children with threats of eternal hellfire and damnation (mental child abuse)

-deaths of children whose parents relied on faith healing

-denying stem cell research (because a cell culture has a soul)

-supporting the collective opposition to any criticism of religious beliefs (like when you got offended at a picture of Jesus)

-claiming raising a Child with one parent is paramount to child abuse (you said that, not really an equivalent to halal, but..)

-Witch Hunts (still happening in africa, thou not suffer a witch to live)

-the idea that the earth is ours to subdue and conquer (Tasmanian Tiger, Amazon)

Those are several examples of what I would say expose unnecessary discomfort upon other beings justified by you lot cause its in the scripture. I thought i'd ignore the crusades and the inquisitions because you guys seem to have got bored of that..


**(late edit, don't answer this on here as it's derailing)**
-------

poor relative, if you can watch the whole video I posted and tell me there is no difference between that and shooting a Roo between the eyes then there is something wrong!!..

kyteryder
NSW, 692 posts
31 May 2011 9:44PM
Thumbs Up

Replay on abc tonight at 11:30pm, for those that missed it



Subscribe
Topic Is Locked

This topic has been locked

Forums > General Discussion   Shooting the breeze...


"4 corners" started by choco