The young man in the video above says he has not been detrimentally affected and maybe he has not but will all be like that and speak so eloquently?
I have known and heard of others who have been deeply affected by the knowledge that they were adopted
Who can say there wont be many children brought up in same sex unions who wont be adversely affected by this knowledge in later life?
Why do same sex unionists want to call their relationship a marriage anyway ?
It is clearly not a marriage so why change the meaning of the institution of marriage?
Unless of course there is an agenda to undermine it and for that matter why adopt the word gay? Again a word that had a totally different meaning
If same sex unionists are comfortable within themselves why try to subvert other
words with other meanings if there is no agenda there ?
They choose not to invent there own descriptions Why is that ? They even use
the terms husbands and wives as descriptions within their unions
There is obviously an agenda no question
Marriage has very little to do with religion it is the very foundation of a strong society
I believe same sex unions can also possibly be a part of that but if they insist on claiming to be married etc why should heteros be sympathetic ?
Same sex couples can't make babies.
But through their manipulation of existing laws they are able to legally acquire them. Children should not be seen as objects that can be acquired - and this goes for single parents who get $900 a pop from the government to pop them out.
I haven't heard anyone, except for Doggie - who spoke about his own experiences as an adopted child - talk about a child's right to their biological mother and father.
It's all about pandering to the politically active 0.000000001% of the population, who talk so passionately about their rights.
Same sex couples should be happy with legal equal rights and puppies.
If 'marriage' and 'children' are more important than their relationship - they should consider a partner from the opposite sex who can make this happen for them.
Well they look happy in the photo and I'm sure Mummy and Mummy will be great parents. But what happens if there is a split in the partnership or something goes wrong? Because the baby was acquired, when it comes down to it will they share the same level of commitment as a regular couple who are both involved in conception? Who get's custody?
I would really love to hear baby Alexandra's story at age 18, and I'm sure we will hear it. I wonder if her school years were filled with the same level of equality as her mothers were? I wonder if she will miss not having a father - like most other kids? I wonder if her biological father has any rights?
It's just a big can of worms. Good luck to Penny, Sophie and Alexandra - I hope they stay as happy as they look in this photo. I don't think it will be an easy road.
One of them is biologically not related to the child.
It is a selfish, indulgent sham of a family group.
Set up purely for the adults, the child has no choice.
What about the childs rights to be raise by ITS
real parents-lefty,trendy,pinko,feminist crap.
Mrs say homo marriage is OK cos they should have rights, and I agree with what ever she says or I get no back door action.
Wait, WTF did I just type... Oh man I'm stuffed I just ate a WHOLE pizza and 2/3 bottle of wine... Tasmanian Pino Noire.
Whats the difference between driving in the fog and eating pussy?
When u are eating pussy you can still see the arshole in front of you!
(1) Damn run out of my 10 thumbs for today just in this thread.
(2) Congrats Adolf, in the running for longest thread since Top Joke 
(3) Boofta for P.M
at cisco: great idea. be compelled to stay in a loveless relationship. resent your spouse. resent the kids as the reason for having to stay together.
makes for a wonderful atmosphere at home to raise the kids until they reach majority. everyone's a winner eh?
anyone who 'KNOWS' penny wong, who she is, what she stands for, and who she sold out too, would never allow her to breed let alone 'buy' a child...
if homosexuality was so 'natural', queerdos could sire their own kids...
funny thing is, never mind the 'species', they can't
So Loggy......
I want to make this really simple for you to answer. And I can only see two answers to this question.
====
Let's look at Penny, Sophie and baby Alexandra as an example.
If things don't work out between Penny and Sophie somewhere down the track and there is a custody dispute.
Do you think:
A. The biological parent should be given a little more weight over the non biological partner, and then other factors are taken into the equation and weighed up.
B. They are both seen as equal - and other factors should determine custody?
Besides, same sex couples raise violent children.
Just tryin to kick it out to 9 pages........
And is that Fez from That 70's show?
that sign there, agressive as it is, sums up everything that is wrong with men hating lesbians...
never met a pillow biter that hates women...
every single soccer playing, roller derbying, womens cricket enthusiast lesbian i've ever met (and having a dyke 'housemate I've met a few) hates men, hates them with a society altering passion
